[Importance of Measuring the Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Treatment].

Q4 Medicine Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2024-06-01
Yohei Miyachi, Teiji Kuzuya, Naoto Kawabe, Yoshiki Hirooka
{"title":"[Importance of Measuring the Urine Protein/Creatinine Ratio in Patients with Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma Receiving Atezolizumab plus Bevacizumab Treatment].","authors":"Yohei Miyachi, Teiji Kuzuya, Naoto Kawabe, Yoshiki Hirooka","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>When we administer atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment to patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, we often encounter inconsistent results between the qualitative dipstick urinalysis and the urine protein/creatinine ratio(UPCR)measurements. In this study, we investigated the relationship between qualitative dipstick urinalysis and UPCR in these patients, and assessed whether incorporating UPCR into the testing protocol could prevent unnecessary interruptions during bevacizumab treatment.</p><p><strong>Subjects and methods: </strong>This study analyzed 298 urine samples collected from 61 patients of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, who were treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab at our institution between October 1, 2020, and August 31, 2021. We used UPCR as an alternative test to the 24-hour urine protein and set the discontinuation criteria for bevacizumab at a UPCR of 2.0 or higher.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 41 samples that tested positive for 2+ on the dipstick test, only one(2.4%)had a UPCR exceeding 2.0. Additionally, among the 44 samples that showed a 3+ result, 24 samples(54.5%)had a UPCR higher than 2.0. If our decision to discontinue bevacizumab had been based on a dipstick urinalysis result of 2+, we could have continued administering bevacizumab in 97.6%(40/41)of the cases. Even if the decision had been based on a dipstick urinalysis result of 3+, we could have continued administering bevacizumab in almost half of the cases(45.5%, 20/44).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that the addition of UPCR to the qualitative dipstick urinalysis during atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma could help prevent unnecessary interruptions of bevacizumab and offer more clinical benefits in real-world practice, compared to using qualitative dipstick urinalysis alone.</p>","PeriodicalId":35588,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: When we administer atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment to patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, we often encounter inconsistent results between the qualitative dipstick urinalysis and the urine protein/creatinine ratio(UPCR)measurements. In this study, we investigated the relationship between qualitative dipstick urinalysis and UPCR in these patients, and assessed whether incorporating UPCR into the testing protocol could prevent unnecessary interruptions during bevacizumab treatment.

Subjects and methods: This study analyzed 298 urine samples collected from 61 patients of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma, who were treated with atezolizumab plus bevacizumab at our institution between October 1, 2020, and August 31, 2021. We used UPCR as an alternative test to the 24-hour urine protein and set the discontinuation criteria for bevacizumab at a UPCR of 2.0 or higher.

Results: Among the 41 samples that tested positive for 2+ on the dipstick test, only one(2.4%)had a UPCR exceeding 2.0. Additionally, among the 44 samples that showed a 3+ result, 24 samples(54.5%)had a UPCR higher than 2.0. If our decision to discontinue bevacizumab had been based on a dipstick urinalysis result of 2+, we could have continued administering bevacizumab in 97.6%(40/41)of the cases. Even if the decision had been based on a dipstick urinalysis result of 3+, we could have continued administering bevacizumab in almost half of the cases(45.5%, 20/44).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that the addition of UPCR to the qualitative dipstick urinalysis during atezolizumab plus bevacizumab treatment for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma could help prevent unnecessary interruptions of bevacizumab and offer more clinical benefits in real-world practice, compared to using qualitative dipstick urinalysis alone.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[测量尿蛋白/肌酐比值对接受阿特珠单抗加贝伐单抗治疗的晚期肝细胞癌患者的重要性】。]
导言在对晚期肝细胞癌患者进行阿特珠单抗联合贝伐单抗治疗时,我们经常会遇到尿液定性量表检查和尿蛋白/肌酐比值(UPCR)测量结果不一致的情况。在这项研究中,我们调查了这些患者的尿液定性量表分析与尿蛋白/肌酐比值之间的关系,并评估了将尿蛋白/肌酐比值纳入检测方案是否能避免贝伐珠单抗治疗过程中不必要的中断:本研究分析了从 2020 年 10 月 1 日至 2021 年 8 月 31 日期间在我院接受阿特珠单抗加贝伐珠单抗治疗的 61 名晚期肝细胞癌患者收集的 298 份尿样。我们使用 UPCR 作为 24 小时尿蛋白的替代检测方法,并将贝伐珠单抗的停药标准设定为 UPCR 达到或超过 2.0:在浸量棒检测呈 2+ 阳性的 41 份样本中,只有一份样本(2.4%)的 UPCR 超过 2.0。此外,在 44 份显示为 3+ 的样本中,有 24 份样本(54.5%)的 UPCR 超过 2.0。如果我们是根据浸量尺尿液分析结果为 2+ 来决定停用贝伐珠单抗,那么 97.6%(40/41)的病例都可以继续使用贝伐珠单抗。即使根据尿液滴定结果为 3+,我们也可以在几乎一半的病例中继续使用贝伐珠单抗(45.5%,20/44):我们的研究结果表明,在阿特珠单抗联合贝伐珠单抗治疗晚期肝细胞癌患者期间,在定性尿液量表分析的基础上增加 UPCR,有助于避免不必要的贝伐珠单抗治疗中断,与单独使用定性尿液量表分析相比,在实际临床实践中能带来更多临床益处。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
337
期刊最新文献
[Ⅰ. Current Topics in Pleural Mesothelioma]. [Ⅱ. Updates on Therapeutic Strategies for Malignant Mediastinal Tumors]. [Ⅲ. Latest Topics of Lung Neuroendocrine Neoplasms]. [A Case of Appendiceal Mucinous Carcinoma with Bladder Invasion Developed from Abscess-Forming Appendicitis, Which Was Curatively Resected after Chemotherapy]. [A Case of Intestinal Lymphoma with Two Perforation in a Short Period Time].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1