[Questionnaire Survey on Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients and Physicians].

Q4 Medicine Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy Pub Date : 2024-06-01
Takahiro Nitta, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Masaru Okubo, Ayana Yamanaka, Akinori Fujiwara, Hiroki Matsumoto
{"title":"[Questionnaire Survey on Early-Stage Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Patients and Physicians].","authors":"Takahiro Nitta, Hiroyuki Tanaka, Masaru Okubo, Ayana Yamanaka, Akinori Fujiwara, Hiroki Matsumoto","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>We conducted an online questionnaire survey to investigate changes in well-being and anxiety in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma requiring repeated locoregional therapy(hepatectomy/ablation)and the differences between patients' and treating physicians' perceptions of what is important to patients when selecting treatment. Between December 2022 and January 2023, we collected responses from 162 patients and 115 physicians in Japan. Results showed no clinically significant changes in well-being over time. Patients experiencing recurrences and repeated locoregional therapy reported increased anxiety regarding\"effectiveness of treatment\"and\"how to handle the disease.\"As\"factors that patients consider important when receiving locoregional therapy,\"many patients and physicians selected suppression of recurrence, prolonged survival, and safety; however, patients placed more importance on\"reducing the number of locoregional therapies\"as they repeatedly experienced recurrence and therapy. Regarding\"information that patients consider important when selecting adjuvant therapy,\"\"effectiveness of treatment\"and\"adverse effects of treatment\"were important to both patients and physicians, while\"maintaining a normal daily life\"was more important in patients and\"length of treatment\"was more important in physicians. In conclusion, some factors are perceived by both physicians and patients as important when selecting treatment, but there is a gap in perception for other factors. Physicians and patients should discuss their opinions on what is important in treatment before deciding on a treatment strategy.</p>","PeriodicalId":35588,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Cancer and Chemotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We conducted an online questionnaire survey to investigate changes in well-being and anxiety in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma requiring repeated locoregional therapy(hepatectomy/ablation)and the differences between patients' and treating physicians' perceptions of what is important to patients when selecting treatment. Between December 2022 and January 2023, we collected responses from 162 patients and 115 physicians in Japan. Results showed no clinically significant changes in well-being over time. Patients experiencing recurrences and repeated locoregional therapy reported increased anxiety regarding"effectiveness of treatment"and"how to handle the disease."As"factors that patients consider important when receiving locoregional therapy,"many patients and physicians selected suppression of recurrence, prolonged survival, and safety; however, patients placed more importance on"reducing the number of locoregional therapies"as they repeatedly experienced recurrence and therapy. Regarding"information that patients consider important when selecting adjuvant therapy,""effectiveness of treatment"and"adverse effects of treatment"were important to both patients and physicians, while"maintaining a normal daily life"was more important in patients and"length of treatment"was more important in physicians. In conclusion, some factors are perceived by both physicians and patients as important when selecting treatment, but there is a gap in perception for other factors. Physicians and patients should discuss their opinions on what is important in treatment before deciding on a treatment strategy.

分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[关于早期肝细胞癌患者和医生的问卷调查]。
我们开展了一项在线问卷调查,以研究需要反复局部治疗(肝切除术/消融术)的肝细胞癌患者的幸福感和焦虑感的变化,以及患者和主治医生在选择治疗方法时对患者重要事项的认知差异。2022 年 12 月至 2023 年 1 月期间,我们收集了日本 162 名患者和 115 名医生的回复。结果显示,随着时间的推移,患者的幸福感没有发生临床意义上的明显变化。对于 "患者在接受局部治疗时认为重要的因素",许多患者和医生选择了抑制复发、延长生存期和安全性;但是,随着患者反复复发和接受治疗,他们更重视 "减少局部治疗的次数"。关于 "患者在选择辅助治疗时认为重要的信息","治疗效果 "和 "治疗的不良反应 "对患者和医生都很重要,而 "维持正常的日常生活 "对患者更重要,"治疗时间 "对医生更重要。总之,在选择治疗方法时,医生和患者都认为某些因素很重要,但对其他因素的认识存在差距。在决定治疗策略之前,医生和患者应就治疗中的重要因素进行讨论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
337
期刊最新文献
[Ⅰ. Current Topics in Pleural Mesothelioma]. [Ⅱ. Updates on Therapeutic Strategies for Malignant Mediastinal Tumors]. [Ⅲ. Latest Topics of Lung Neuroendocrine Neoplasms]. [A Case of Appendiceal Mucinous Carcinoma with Bladder Invasion Developed from Abscess-Forming Appendicitis, Which Was Curatively Resected after Chemotherapy]. [A Case of Intestinal Lymphoma with Two Perforation in a Short Period Time].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1