Access to best-evidenced mental health support for care-experienced young people: Learnings from the implementation of cognitive therapy for PTSD.

IF 3.8 3区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL British Journal of Clinical Psychology Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1111/bjc.12471
Rosie McGuire, Richard Meiser-Stedman, Patrick Smith, Davin Schmidt, Gretchen Bjornstad, Robyn Bosworth, Timothy Clarke, Joe Coombes, Emma Geijer Simpson, Kristian Hudson, Paula Oliveira, John Macleod, Ruth McGovern, Paul Stallard, Katie Wood, Rachel M Hiller
{"title":"Access to best-evidenced mental health support for care-experienced young people: Learnings from the implementation of cognitive therapy for PTSD.","authors":"Rosie McGuire, Richard Meiser-Stedman, Patrick Smith, Davin Schmidt, Gretchen Bjornstad, Robyn Bosworth, Timothy Clarke, Joe Coombes, Emma Geijer Simpson, Kristian Hudson, Paula Oliveira, John Macleod, Ruth McGovern, Paul Stallard, Katie Wood, Rachel M Hiller","doi":"10.1111/bjc.12471","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Rates of PTSD are up to 12 times higher in care-experienced young people (CEYP) compared to their peers. Trauma-focused CBTs (tf-CBT) are the best-evidenced treatment for youth with PTSD, yet, in practice, CEYP often struggle to access this treatment. We worked alongside services to understand barriers and facilitators of the implementation of cognitive therapy for PTSD (a type of tf-CBT) to CEYP.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>This was an active, open implementation trial.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We recruited 28 mental health teams across England, including general CAMHS, targeted CAMHS for CEYP and social care-based teams. From these teams, participants were 243 mental health professionals, from a wide variety of professional backgrounds. Following recruitment/intervention training, teams participated in rolling three monthly focus groups and individual interviews, to understand what helped and hindered implementation. Data were analysed using a framework analysis conducted using CFIR 2.0.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Almost half of the teams were able to implement, but only approximately one quarter with CEYP, specifically. Universal barriers that were discussed by almost all teams particularly highlighted service structures and poor resourcing as major barriers to delivery to CEYP, as well as the complexities of the young person and their network. Unique factors that differentiated teams who did and did not implement included commissioning practices, the culture of the team, leadership engagement and style, and the development of supervision structures.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Findings offer key considerations for mental health teams, service leads, commissioners and policy-makers to enhance delivery of best-evidenced mental health treatments like CT-PTSD, for CEYP.</p>","PeriodicalId":48211,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Clinical Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/bjc.12471","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: Rates of PTSD are up to 12 times higher in care-experienced young people (CEYP) compared to their peers. Trauma-focused CBTs (tf-CBT) are the best-evidenced treatment for youth with PTSD, yet, in practice, CEYP often struggle to access this treatment. We worked alongside services to understand barriers and facilitators of the implementation of cognitive therapy for PTSD (a type of tf-CBT) to CEYP.

Design: This was an active, open implementation trial.

Methods: We recruited 28 mental health teams across England, including general CAMHS, targeted CAMHS for CEYP and social care-based teams. From these teams, participants were 243 mental health professionals, from a wide variety of professional backgrounds. Following recruitment/intervention training, teams participated in rolling three monthly focus groups and individual interviews, to understand what helped and hindered implementation. Data were analysed using a framework analysis conducted using CFIR 2.0.

Results: Almost half of the teams were able to implement, but only approximately one quarter with CEYP, specifically. Universal barriers that were discussed by almost all teams particularly highlighted service structures and poor resourcing as major barriers to delivery to CEYP, as well as the complexities of the young person and their network. Unique factors that differentiated teams who did and did not implement included commissioning practices, the culture of the team, leadership engagement and style, and the development of supervision structures.

Conclusions: Findings offer key considerations for mental health teams, service leads, commissioners and policy-makers to enhance delivery of best-evidenced mental health treatments like CT-PTSD, for CEYP.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为有护理经验的青少年提供最有效的心理健康支持:从创伤后应激障碍认知疗法的实施中汲取经验。
目的:与同龄人相比,有护理经历的青少年(CEYP)的创伤后应激障碍发病率要高出 12 倍。以创伤为重点的 CBT(创伤心理治疗)是治疗创伤后应激障碍青少年的最有效方法,但在实践中,有护理经历的青少年往往难以获得这种治疗。我们与相关服务机构合作,以了解对中青儿童实施创伤后应激障碍认知疗法(tf-CBT 的一种)的障碍和促进因素:设计:这是一项积极、开放的实施试验:我们在英格兰招募了 28 个心理健康团队,包括普通的儿童青少年心理健康服务机构、针对儿童青少年的儿童青少年心理健康服务机构以及以社会关怀为基础的团队。这些团队中有 243 名来自不同专业背景的心理健康专业人员。在招募/干预培训之后,各团队参加了每月滚动举行的三次焦点小组讨论和个别访谈,以了解对实施有帮助和有阻碍的因素。使用 CFIR 2.0 进行框架分析,对数据进行分析:近一半的团队能够实施,但只有约四分之一的团队具体实施了幼儿保育和教育计划。几乎所有团队都讨论了普遍存在的障碍,特别强调了服务结构和资源匮乏是向中欧和东欧幼儿提供服务的主要障碍,以及青少年及其网络的复杂性。区别实施和未实施的团队的独特因素包括委托实践、团队文化、领导参与和风格,以及监督结构的发展:研究结果为心理健康团队、服务领导者、委托人和政策制定者提供了关键的考虑因素,以加强为 CEYP 提供诸如 CT-PTSD 等最有效的心理健康治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
3.20%
发文量
57
期刊介绍: The British Journal of Clinical Psychology publishes original research, both empirical and theoretical, on all aspects of clinical psychology: - clinical and abnormal psychology featuring descriptive or experimental studies - aetiology, assessment and treatment of the whole range of psychological disorders irrespective of age group and setting - biological influences on individual behaviour - studies of psychological interventions and treatment on individuals, dyads, families and groups
期刊最新文献
More than Body Appearance! Improving body image in young women through a functionality-focused intervention combined with psychoeducation: A randomized controlled trial. A single-session feedback training modifies interpretation bias in individuals with high social anxiety: A randomized controlled trial. Trauma and social pathways to psychosis: Examining the role of attachment, social rank and dissociation in a clinical sample. Ensuring that psychological interventions are delivered as intended on mental health inpatient wards. Predicting optimal treatment allocation for cognitive analytic-guided self-help versus cognitive behavioural-guided self-help.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1