Personalized goals of people living with dementia and family carers: A content analysis of goals set within an individually tailored psychosocial intervention trial

Jessica Budgett, Andrew Sommerlad, Nuriye Kupeli, Sedigheh Zabihi, Kenneth Rockwood, Claudia Cooper
{"title":"Personalized goals of people living with dementia and family carers: A content analysis of goals set within an individually tailored psychosocial intervention trial","authors":"Jessica Budgett,&nbsp;Andrew Sommerlad,&nbsp;Nuriye Kupeli,&nbsp;Sedigheh Zabihi,&nbsp;Kenneth Rockwood,&nbsp;Claudia Cooper","doi":"10.1002/trc2.12493","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>Person-centered goals capture individual priorities in personal contexts. Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) has been used in drug trials involving people living with dementia (PLWD) but GAS has been characterized as difficult to incorporate into trials and clinical practice. We used GAS in a trial of New Interventions for Independence in Dementia Study (NIDUS)-family, a manualized care and support intervention, as the primary outcome and to tailor the interventions to goals set. We aimed to assess the feasibility and content of baseline goal-setting.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We developed training for nonclinical facilitators to set individualized GAS goals remotely with PLWD and family carer dyads, or carers alone, in the intervention trial, during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative content analysis of the goals set explored participants’ priorities and unmet needs, to consider how existing GAS goal domains might be extended in a psychosocial intervention trial context.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Eleven facilitators were successfully trained to set and score GAS goals. A total of 313/328 (95%) participants were able to collaboratively set three to five goals with the facilitators. Of these, 302 randomized participating dyads set 1043 (mean 3.5, range 3 to 5) goals. We deductively coded 719 (69%) goals into five existing GAS domains (mood, behavior, self-care, cognition, and instrumental activities of daily living); 324 (31%) goals were inductively coded into four new domains: carer break, carer mood, carer behavior, and carer sleep. The most frequently set goals pertained to social support. There was little variation in types of goals set based on the context of who set them or level of pandemic restrictions in place.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Discussion</h3>\n \n <p>It is feasible for people without clinical training to set GAS holistic goals for PLWD and family carers in the community. GAS has potential to facilitate personalization of care and support interventions, such as NIDUS-family, and facilitate the roll out of more personalized care.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Highlights</h3>\n \n <div>\n <ul>\n \n <li>Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) can capture meaningful priorities of people with dementia and their family carers.</li>\n \n <li>A psychosocial intervention RCT used GAS as the primary outcome measure and goals were set collaboratively by non-clinically trained facilitators.</li>\n \n <li>The findings underscore the feasibility of using GAS as an outcome measure with this population.</li>\n \n <li>The content analysis findings unveiled the diversity in experiences and priorities of the study participants.</li>\n \n <li>GAS has the potential to support the implementation of more person-centred approaches to dementia care.</li>\n </ul>\n </div>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":53225,"journal":{"name":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","volume":"10 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247364/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Alzheimer''s and Dementia: Translational Research and Clinical Interventions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/trc2.12493","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Person-centered goals capture individual priorities in personal contexts. Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) has been used in drug trials involving people living with dementia (PLWD) but GAS has been characterized as difficult to incorporate into trials and clinical practice. We used GAS in a trial of New Interventions for Independence in Dementia Study (NIDUS)-family, a manualized care and support intervention, as the primary outcome and to tailor the interventions to goals set. We aimed to assess the feasibility and content of baseline goal-setting.

Methods

We developed training for nonclinical facilitators to set individualized GAS goals remotely with PLWD and family carer dyads, or carers alone, in the intervention trial, during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative content analysis of the goals set explored participants’ priorities and unmet needs, to consider how existing GAS goal domains might be extended in a psychosocial intervention trial context.

Results

Eleven facilitators were successfully trained to set and score GAS goals. A total of 313/328 (95%) participants were able to collaboratively set three to five goals with the facilitators. Of these, 302 randomized participating dyads set 1043 (mean 3.5, range 3 to 5) goals. We deductively coded 719 (69%) goals into five existing GAS domains (mood, behavior, self-care, cognition, and instrumental activities of daily living); 324 (31%) goals were inductively coded into four new domains: carer break, carer mood, carer behavior, and carer sleep. The most frequently set goals pertained to social support. There was little variation in types of goals set based on the context of who set them or level of pandemic restrictions in place.

Discussion

It is feasible for people without clinical training to set GAS holistic goals for PLWD and family carers in the community. GAS has potential to facilitate personalization of care and support interventions, such as NIDUS-family, and facilitate the roll out of more personalized care.

Highlights

  • Goal Attainment Scaling (GAS) can capture meaningful priorities of people with dementia and their family carers.
  • A psychosocial intervention RCT used GAS as the primary outcome measure and goals were set collaboratively by non-clinically trained facilitators.
  • The findings underscore the feasibility of using GAS as an outcome measure with this population.
  • The content analysis findings unveiled the diversity in experiences and priorities of the study participants.
  • GAS has the potential to support the implementation of more person-centred approaches to dementia care.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
痴呆症患者和家庭照顾者的个性化目标:对个人定制心理干预试验中设定的目标进行内容分析。
引言以人为本的目标捕捉了个人在个人环境中的优先事项。目标达成量表(GAS)已被用于痴呆症患者(PLWD)参与的药物试验中,但GAS的特点是很难被纳入试验和临床实践中。我们在一项名为 "痴呆症患者独立生活新干预研究(NIDUS)--家庭 "的试验中使用了 GAS,这是一种手册化的护理和支持干预措施,我们将其作为主要结果,并根据设定的目标调整干预措施。我们旨在评估基线目标设定的可行性和内容:方法:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,我们为非临床辅助人员提供了培训,以便在干预试验中与 PLWD 和家庭照顾者二人组或单独照顾者一起远程设定个性化的 GAS 目标。对设定的目标进行了定性内容分析,探讨了参与者的优先事项和未满足的需求,以考虑如何在社会心理干预试验中扩展现有的 GAS 目标领域:11 名主持人成功接受了 GAS 目标设定和评分培训。共有 313/328 名参与者(95%)能够与主持人合作设定三至五个目标。其中,302 个随机参与的二人组设定了 1043 个目标(平均 3.5 个,范围 3 到 5 个)。我们将 719 个目标(69%)演绎编码为现有的五个 GAS 领域(情绪、行为、自我护理、认知和日常生活工具性活动);将 324 个目标(31%)归纳编码为四个新领域:照护者休息、照护者情绪、照护者行为和照护者睡眠。最常设定的目标与社会支持有关。根据设定目标的人或大流行病限制的程度,设定的目标类型几乎没有差异:讨论:没有接受过临床培训的人也可以为社区中的 PLWD 和家庭照顾者制定 GAS 整体目标。GAS 有可能促进护理和支持干预措施(如 NIDUS-family)的个性化,并促进更多个性化护理的推广:目标达成量表(GAS)可以捕捉到痴呆症患者及其家庭照护者有意义的优先事项。一项社会心理干预RCT研究将GAS作为主要的结果测量指标,目标由非临床培训的促进者共同制定。研究结果强调了将GAS作为该人群的结果测量指标的可行性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.10
自引率
2.10%
发文量
134
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Alzheimer''s & Dementia: Translational Research & Clinical Interventions (TRCI) is a peer-reviewed, open access,journal from the Alzheimer''s Association®. The journal seeks to bridge the full scope of explorations between basic research on drug discovery and clinical studies, validating putative therapies for aging-related chronic brain conditions that affect cognition, motor functions, and other behavioral or clinical symptoms associated with all forms dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish findings from diverse domains of research and disciplines to accelerate the conversion of abstract facts into practical knowledge: specifically, to translate what is learned at the bench into bedside applications. The journal seeks to publish articles that go beyond a singular emphasis on either basic drug discovery research or clinical research. Rather, an important theme of articles will be the linkages between and among the various discrete steps in the complex continuum of therapy development. For rapid communication among a multidisciplinary research audience involving the range of therapeutic interventions, TRCI will consider only original contributions that include feature length research articles, systematic reviews, meta-analyses, brief reports, narrative reviews, commentaries, letters, perspectives, and research news that would advance wide range of interventions to ameliorate symptoms or alter the progression of chronic neurocognitive disorders such as dementia and Alzheimer''s disease. The journal will publish on topics related to medicine, geriatrics, neuroscience, neurophysiology, neurology, psychiatry, clinical psychology, bioinformatics, pharmaco-genetics, regulatory issues, health economics, pharmacoeconomics, and public health policy as these apply to preclinical and clinical research on therapeutics.
期刊最新文献
Anticholinergic drugs and dementia risk: Using stem cell–based studies to complement pharmacoepidemiology Data-driven discovery of associations between prescribed drugs and dementia risk: A systematic review Perspective: Minimally clinically important “symptomatic” benefit associated with disease modification resulting from anti-amyloid immunotherapy Dynamic neurocognitive adaptation in aging: Development and validation of a new scale Unraveling the impact of blood RANKL and OPG levels on Alzheimer's disease: Independent of bone mineral density and inflammation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1