Factors influencing nursing student satisfaction in aged care placements: An Australian cross-sectional study

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q1 NURSING Nurse Education in Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104064
{"title":"Factors influencing nursing student satisfaction in aged care placements: An Australian cross-sectional study","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.nepr.2024.104064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Aim</h3><p>This study aimed to investigate factors influencing nursing students’ satisfaction with aged care placements.</p></div><div><h3>Background</h3><p>Providing positive clinical experiences in aged care is crucial for students to learn safe, quality care and to foster a sustainable workforce.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>Cross-sectional study</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Nursing students in nursing degrees participated in the national placement evaluation survey. A total of 2378 responses were extracted from the national clinical placement evaluation survey in 2023. Using multinomial logistic regression, demographics, academic, placement characteristics and placement education quality (clinical environment and learning support) were investigated in relation to three different levels of students' overall satisfaction (low, moderate, high).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Students reported overall satisfaction with their clinical placement, with a mean score of 7.9 (SD=2.1) on a 10-point scale. While most students agreed that they had achieved their learning objectives (90.0 %), they reported limited opportunities to interact with the multidisciplinary team (80.0 %). Further, students reported a relatively negative experience with staff, such as willingness to work with students (78.9 %) and being positive role models (78.9 %). Comparing the low satisfaction group to the moderate satisfaction group, male gender, identifying as an indigenous student and higher academic years increased the odds of being ‘least satisfied’, whereas international students, whose first language was not English and those with higher perceived placement education quality scores had lower odds of low satisfaction group membership. Conversely, compared with the moderate satisfaction group, those with the highest satisfaction with their clinical placement had a greater odds of being older, an international student and having higher scores in placement quality for the clinical environment and learning support. This model predicted 58.7 % of students' overall satisfaction.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Positive learning experiences in aged care may promote the importance of practice in this area to new graduates. Despite students’ overall positive satisfaction with aged care placements, it is clear there are areas to address: a need to develop a structured approach to enhance aged care clinical experiences, progressive development of learning objectives, enhancing student career preparation and increasing participation in interprofessional collaboration may be useful approaches.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48715,"journal":{"name":"Nurse Education in Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nurse Education in Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1471595324001938","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim

This study aimed to investigate factors influencing nursing students’ satisfaction with aged care placements.

Background

Providing positive clinical experiences in aged care is crucial for students to learn safe, quality care and to foster a sustainable workforce.

Design

Cross-sectional study

Methods

Nursing students in nursing degrees participated in the national placement evaluation survey. A total of 2378 responses were extracted from the national clinical placement evaluation survey in 2023. Using multinomial logistic regression, demographics, academic, placement characteristics and placement education quality (clinical environment and learning support) were investigated in relation to three different levels of students' overall satisfaction (low, moderate, high).

Results

Students reported overall satisfaction with their clinical placement, with a mean score of 7.9 (SD=2.1) on a 10-point scale. While most students agreed that they had achieved their learning objectives (90.0 %), they reported limited opportunities to interact with the multidisciplinary team (80.0 %). Further, students reported a relatively negative experience with staff, such as willingness to work with students (78.9 %) and being positive role models (78.9 %). Comparing the low satisfaction group to the moderate satisfaction group, male gender, identifying as an indigenous student and higher academic years increased the odds of being ‘least satisfied’, whereas international students, whose first language was not English and those with higher perceived placement education quality scores had lower odds of low satisfaction group membership. Conversely, compared with the moderate satisfaction group, those with the highest satisfaction with their clinical placement had a greater odds of being older, an international student and having higher scores in placement quality for the clinical environment and learning support. This model predicted 58.7 % of students' overall satisfaction.

Conclusions

Positive learning experiences in aged care may promote the importance of practice in this area to new graduates. Despite students’ overall positive satisfaction with aged care placements, it is clear there are areas to address: a need to develop a structured approach to enhance aged care clinical experiences, progressive development of learning objectives, enhancing student career preparation and increasing participation in interprofessional collaboration may be useful approaches.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响护理专业学生对老年护理实习满意度的因素:澳大利亚横断面研究
目的本研究旨在调查影响护理专业学生对养老护理实习满意度的因素。背景提供积极的养老护理临床经验对于学生学习安全、高质量的护理以及培养可持续的劳动力至关重要。设计横断面研究方法护理专业的学生参与了全国实习评估调查。从 2023 年的全国临床实习评估调查中共提取了 2378 份回复。采用多项式逻辑回归法,研究了人口统计学、学术、实习特点和实习教育质量(临床环境和学习支持)与学生总体满意度的三种不同水平(低、中、高)的关系。结果学生对其临床实习总体满意,在 10 分制中平均得分为 7.9 分(SD=2.1)。虽然大多数学生认为他们达到了学习目标(90.0%),但他们表示与多学科团队互动的机会有限(80.0%)。此外,学生还对教职员工的工作态度(如是否愿意与学生合作(78.9 %)和是否是积极的榜样(78.9 %))表示相对消极。将低满意度组与中等满意度组进行比较,发现男生性别、原住民学生身份和较高的学年会增加 "最不满意 "的几率,而国际学生、母语不是英语的学生和认为安置教育质量得分较高的学生属于低满意度组的几率较低。相反,与中等满意度组相比,对临床实习满意度最高的学生中,年龄较大、国际学生以及临床环境和学习支持方面的实习质量得分较高者的几率更大。该模型预测了 58.7% 的学生的总体满意度。结论积极的老年护理学习经历可以向新毕业生宣传该领域实践的重要性。尽管学生对老年护理实习的总体满意度较高,但显然仍有一些领域需要解决:需要开发一种结构化的方法来增强老年护理临床经验、逐步制定学习目标、加强学生的职业准备以及增加对跨专业合作的参与,这些都可能是有用的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
9.40%
发文量
180
审稿时长
51 days
期刊介绍: Nurse Education in Practice enables lecturers and practitioners to both share and disseminate evidence that demonstrates the actual practice of education as it is experienced in the realities of their respective work environments. It is supportive of new authors and will be at the forefront in publishing individual and collaborative papers that demonstrate the link between education and practice.
期刊最新文献
“Removing the home court advantage”: A qualitative evaluation of LEGO® as an interprofessional simulation icebreaker for midwifery and medical students Does being involved in a research project enhance the postgraduate taught student experience: A qualitative research case study Investigating clinical decision-making in bleeding complications among nursing students: A longitudinal mixed-methods study Simulation as a method in a supervision course, experiences of midwives and specialist nurses: A qualitative study Characteristics of nursing educators' professional competency standards: A scoping review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1