They can play, but…: Investigating teachers' use of exclusionary discipline practices as anti-Black misandric restrictions of Black boyhood play in early childhood classrooms

IF 2 3区 教育学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Learning Culture and Social Interaction Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1016/j.lcsi.2024.100840
Nathaniel Bryan , Michelle DeJohnette , Prince Johnson
{"title":"They can play, but…: Investigating teachers' use of exclusionary discipline practices as anti-Black misandric restrictions of Black boyhood play in early childhood classrooms","authors":"Nathaniel Bryan ,&nbsp;Michelle DeJohnette ,&nbsp;Prince Johnson","doi":"10.1016/j.lcsi.2024.100840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Childhood play is foundational to early childhood education, yet teachers criminalize Black boyhood play in and beyond early childhood classrooms. It is noted in the extant research literature that early childhood teachers' stereotypes and biases of Black boys inform how they view their play styles and behaviors. These stereotypes and biases often lead to exclusionary discipline practices, namely Black boys' removal from play opportunities in early childhood classrooms. Given that childhood play is beneficial to young children's academic and social development, teachers' use of exclusionary discipline practices during play can exacerbate opportunity gaps between Black boys and their White counterparts. It can disrupt Black boys' opportunities for play and recreation in early childhood classrooms. However, scholars have understudied teachers' use of exclusionary discipline practices during Black boyhood play. Drawing on Black Critical Theory, anti-Black spatial imaginary, Black Male Studies, and employing a multi-case study design, we aim to explore teachers' use of disciplinary practices during Black boyhood play. The following research question guides this study: What exclusionary discipline practices do early childhood teachers use to restrict Black boyhood play? Findings suggest that teachers use what we term the three antiblack misandric restrictions of boyhood play, which include (a) restriction of time, (b) restriction of space, and (c) restriction of interactions.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46850,"journal":{"name":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","volume":"47 ","pages":"Article 100840"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Learning Culture and Social Interaction","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210656124000485","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Childhood play is foundational to early childhood education, yet teachers criminalize Black boyhood play in and beyond early childhood classrooms. It is noted in the extant research literature that early childhood teachers' stereotypes and biases of Black boys inform how they view their play styles and behaviors. These stereotypes and biases often lead to exclusionary discipline practices, namely Black boys' removal from play opportunities in early childhood classrooms. Given that childhood play is beneficial to young children's academic and social development, teachers' use of exclusionary discipline practices during play can exacerbate opportunity gaps between Black boys and their White counterparts. It can disrupt Black boys' opportunities for play and recreation in early childhood classrooms. However, scholars have understudied teachers' use of exclusionary discipline practices during Black boyhood play. Drawing on Black Critical Theory, anti-Black spatial imaginary, Black Male Studies, and employing a multi-case study design, we aim to explore teachers' use of disciplinary practices during Black boyhood play. The following research question guides this study: What exclusionary discipline practices do early childhood teachers use to restrict Black boyhood play? Findings suggest that teachers use what we term the three antiblack misandric restrictions of boyhood play, which include (a) restriction of time, (b) restriction of space, and (c) restriction of interactions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
他们可以玩,但是.....:调查教师在幼儿课堂上使用排斥性纪律措施作为对黑人男孩游戏的反黑人歧视性限制的情况
童年游戏是幼儿教育的基础,但教师却在幼儿课堂内外将黑人男孩的游戏视为犯罪。现有的研究文献指出,幼儿教师对黑人男孩的成见和偏见会影响他们如何看待黑人男孩的游戏方式和行为。这些成见和偏见常常导致排斥性的管教做法,即黑人男孩被剥夺了在幼儿课堂上游戏的机会。鉴于童年游戏有益于幼儿的学业和社会发展,教师在游戏过程中使用排斥性管教方法会加剧黑人男孩与白人男孩之间的机会差距。它可能会破坏黑人男孩在幼儿课堂上游戏和娱乐的机会。然而,学者们对教师在黑人男孩游戏过程中使用排他性纪律措施的情况研究不足。借鉴黑人批判理论、反黑人空间想象、黑人男性研究,并采用多案例研究设计,我们旨在探索黑人男孩游戏过程中教师使用纪律处分的情况。本研究以下列研究问题为指导:幼儿教师在限制黑人男孩游戏时使用了哪些排他性纪律措施?研究结果表明,教师对男孩游戏使用了我们称之为 "三种反黑人的错误限制",包括(a)时间限制、(b)空间限制和(c)互动限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Learning Culture and Social Interaction
Learning Culture and Social Interaction EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
10.50%
发文量
50
期刊最新文献
Investigating upper-secondary school learners' contributions in co-regulation and socially shared regulation during collaborative learning A dynamic systems examination of the impact of peers on educator–infant synchrony within joint attention interactions in an early childhood room Authority and positionings in elementary mathematics: An interactional ethnographic approach Peer interactions in 4/6-month-old infants: From motor development to multimodal communication Egalitarian dialogue and student participation in Learning Communities. The case of the Coquimbo Region, Chile
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1