Towards Efficient Fine-Tuning of Language Models With Organizational Data for Automated Software Review

IF 6.5 1区 计算机科学 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1109/TSE.2024.3428324
Mona Nashaat;James Miller
{"title":"Towards Efficient Fine-Tuning of Language Models With Organizational Data for Automated Software Review","authors":"Mona Nashaat;James Miller","doi":"10.1109/TSE.2024.3428324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large language models like BERT and GPT possess significant capabilities and potential impacts across various applications. Software engineers often use these models for code-related tasks, including generating, debugging, and summarizing code. Nevertheless, large language models still have several flaws, including model hallucination. (e.g., generating erroneous code and producing outdated and inaccurate programs) and the substantial computational resources and energy required for training and fine-tuning. To tackle these challenges, we propose CodeMentor, a framework for few-shot learning to train large language models with the data available within the organization. We employ the framework to train a language model for code review activities, such as code refinement and review generation. The framework utilizes heuristic rules and weak supervision techniques to leverage available data, such as previous review comments, issue reports, and related code updates. Then, the framework employs the constructed dataset to fine-tune LLMs for code review tasks. Additionally, the framework integrates domain expertise by employing reinforcement learning with human feedback. This allows domain experts to assess the generated code and enhance the model performance. Also, to assess the performance of the proposed model, we evaluate it with four state-of-the-art techniques in various code review tasks. The experimental results attest that CodeMentor enhances the performance in all tasks compared to the state-of-the-art approaches, with an improvement of up to 22.3%, 43.4%, and 24.3% in code quality estimation, review generation, and bug report summarization tasks, respectively.","PeriodicalId":13324,"journal":{"name":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","volume":"50 9","pages":"2240-2253"},"PeriodicalIF":6.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/10599336/","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, SOFTWARE ENGINEERING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large language models like BERT and GPT possess significant capabilities and potential impacts across various applications. Software engineers often use these models for code-related tasks, including generating, debugging, and summarizing code. Nevertheless, large language models still have several flaws, including model hallucination. (e.g., generating erroneous code and producing outdated and inaccurate programs) and the substantial computational resources and energy required for training and fine-tuning. To tackle these challenges, we propose CodeMentor, a framework for few-shot learning to train large language models with the data available within the organization. We employ the framework to train a language model for code review activities, such as code refinement and review generation. The framework utilizes heuristic rules and weak supervision techniques to leverage available data, such as previous review comments, issue reports, and related code updates. Then, the framework employs the constructed dataset to fine-tune LLMs for code review tasks. Additionally, the framework integrates domain expertise by employing reinforcement learning with human feedback. This allows domain experts to assess the generated code and enhance the model performance. Also, to assess the performance of the proposed model, we evaluate it with four state-of-the-art techniques in various code review tasks. The experimental results attest that CodeMentor enhances the performance in all tasks compared to the state-of-the-art approaches, with an improvement of up to 22.3%, 43.4%, and 24.3% in code quality estimation, review generation, and bug report summarization tasks, respectively.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用组织数据高效微调语言模型,实现软件自动审查
像 BERT 和 GPT 这样的大型语言模型拥有强大的功能,并能对各种应用产生潜在影响。软件工程师经常将这些模型用于代码相关任务,包括生成、调试和总结代码。然而,大型语言模型仍然存在一些缺陷,包括模型幻觉。(例如,生成错误的代码,生成过时和不准确的程序),以及训练和微调所需的大量计算资源和能源。为了应对这些挑战,我们提出了 CodeMentor,一个利用组织内部可用数据训练大型语言模型的少量学习框架。我们利用该框架为代码审查活动(如代码完善和审查生成)训练语言模型。该框架利用启发式规则和弱监督技术来利用可用数据,如以前的审查意见、问题报告和相关代码更新。然后,该框架利用构建的数据集对代码审查任务的 LLM 进行微调。此外,该框架还通过采用强化学习和人工反馈来整合领域专业知识。这样,领域专家就可以对生成的代码进行评估,并提高模型的性能。此外,为了评估所提出模型的性能,我们在各种代码审查任务中用四种最先进的技术对其进行了评估。实验结果证明,与最先进的方法相比,CodeMentor 提高了所有任务的性能,在代码质量评估、审查生成和错误报告汇总任务中分别提高了 22.3%、43.4% 和 24.3%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering
IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering 工程技术-工程:电子与电气
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
10.80%
发文量
724
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering seeks contributions comprising well-defined theoretical results and empirical studies with potential impacts on software construction, analysis, or management. The scope of this Transactions extends from fundamental mechanisms to the development of principles and their application in specific environments. Specific topic areas include: a) Development and maintenance methods and models: Techniques and principles for specifying, designing, and implementing software systems, encompassing notations and process models. b) Assessment methods: Software tests, validation, reliability models, test and diagnosis procedures, software redundancy, design for error control, and measurements and evaluation of process and product aspects. c) Software project management: Productivity factors, cost models, schedule and organizational issues, and standards. d) Tools and environments: Specific tools, integrated tool environments, associated architectures, databases, and parallel and distributed processing issues. e) System issues: Hardware-software trade-offs. f) State-of-the-art surveys: Syntheses and comprehensive reviews of the historical development within specific areas of interest.
期刊最新文献
Line-Level Defect Prediction by Capturing Code Contexts with Graph Convolutional Networks Does Treatment Adherence Impact Experiment Results in TDD? Scoping Software Engineering for AI: The TSE Perspective A context-aware clustering approach for assisting operators in classifying security alerts StagedVulBERT: Multi-Granular Vulnerability Detection with a Novel Pre-trained Code Model
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1