Simulation Training in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery: A Nationwide Survey Among Surgeon Educators and Trainees in France

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q3 PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE Annals of vascular surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.avsg.2024.07.082
{"title":"Simulation Training in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery: A Nationwide Survey Among Surgeon Educators and Trainees in France","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.avsg.2024.07.082","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Vascular surgical training is evolving towards simulation-based methods to enhance skill development, ensure patient safety, and adapt to changing regulations. This study aims to investigate the utilization of simulation training among vascular surgeons in France, amidst ongoing shifts in teaching approaches and educational reforms.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A national survey assessed the experiences and perceptions of vascular surgery professionals regarding simulation training. Participation was open to self-reported health professionals specialized (or specializing) in vascular surgery, including interns or fellows. Participants were recruited through various channels, and data were collected via a questionnaire covering participant characteristics, simulation experiences, and perceptions.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seventy-six participants, predominantly male (74%) took part in the survey. While 58% reported access to simulation laboratories, only 17% had organized simulation sessions 1–3 times a year, and 5% had sessions more than 10 times annually. High fidelity simulators were available in 57% of institutions, while low fidelity simulators were available in 50%. Regarding funding, 20% received financial assistance for training, predominantly from industry (18%). One-third of the participants experienced 9 or more sessions (34%), lasting between 1 and 2 hours (34%), 30% expressed satisfaction with access to simulation, while 33% were dissatisfied with communication of simulation training opportunities.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Despite recognizing the benefits of simulation training, its integration into vascular surgery education in France remains incomplete. Challenges such as limited access and communication barriers hinder widespread adoption. Collaborative efforts are needed to ensure uniformity and enhance the effectiveness of simulation training in vascular surgery education.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8061,"journal":{"name":"Annals of vascular surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of vascular surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0890509624003959","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PERIPHERAL VASCULAR DISEASE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Vascular surgical training is evolving towards simulation-based methods to enhance skill development, ensure patient safety, and adapt to changing regulations. This study aims to investigate the utilization of simulation training among vascular surgeons in France, amidst ongoing shifts in teaching approaches and educational reforms.

Methods

A national survey assessed the experiences and perceptions of vascular surgery professionals regarding simulation training. Participation was open to self-reported health professionals specialized (or specializing) in vascular surgery, including interns or fellows. Participants were recruited through various channels, and data were collected via a questionnaire covering participant characteristics, simulation experiences, and perceptions.

Results

Seventy-six participants, predominantly male (74%) took part in the survey. While 58% reported access to simulation laboratories, only 17% had organized simulation sessions 1–3 times a year, and 5% had sessions more than 10 times annually. High fidelity simulators were available in 57% of institutions, while low fidelity simulators were available in 50%. Regarding funding, 20% received financial assistance for training, predominantly from industry (18%). One-third of the participants experienced 9 or more sessions (34%), lasting between 1 and 2 hours (34%), 30% expressed satisfaction with access to simulation, while 33% were dissatisfied with communication of simulation training opportunities.

Conclusions

Despite recognizing the benefits of simulation training, its integration into vascular surgery education in France remains incomplete. Challenges such as limited access and communication barriers hinder widespread adoption. Collaborative efforts are needed to ensure uniformity and enhance the effectiveness of simulation training in vascular surgery education.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
血管和血管内手术模拟培训:针对法国外科医生教育者和受训者的全国性调查。
目的:血管外科培训正朝着以模拟为基础的方法发展,以提高技能发展、确保患者安全并适应不断变化的法规。本研究旨在调查在教学方法和教育改革不断转变的情况下,法国血管外科医生对模拟训练的使用情况:一项全国性调查评估了血管外科专业人员在模拟培训方面的经验和看法。自述为血管外科专业(或专攻血管外科)的医务人员均可参加,包括实习生或研究员。研究人员通过各种渠道招募参与者,并通过调查问卷收集数据,问卷内容包括参与者的特征、模拟体验和看法:76名参与者参与了调查,其中男性占绝大多数(74%)。58%的人表示可以使用模拟实验室,但只有17%的人每年组织1至3次模拟训练,5%的人每年组织10次以上模拟训练。57%的机构有高保真模拟器,50%的机构有低保真模拟器。在资金方面,20%的培训获得了财政援助,主要来自行业(18%)。三分之一的参与者经历了9次或9次以上的培训(34%),持续时间在1至2小时之间(34%),30%的参与者对获得模拟培训的机会表示满意,而33%的参与者对模拟培训机会的沟通表示不满:尽管认识到模拟训练的益处,但在法国,将其纳入血管外科教育的工作仍未完成。有限的使用机会和沟通障碍等挑战阻碍了模拟培训的广泛采用。要确保血管外科教育中模拟训练的统一性并提高其效果,需要各方共同努力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.00
自引率
13.30%
发文量
603
审稿时长
50 days
期刊介绍: Annals of Vascular Surgery, published eight times a year, invites original manuscripts reporting clinical and experimental work in vascular surgery for peer review. Articles may be submitted for the following sections of the journal: Clinical Research (reports of clinical series, new drug or medical device trials) Basic Science Research (new investigations, experimental work) Case Reports (reports on a limited series of patients) General Reviews (scholarly review of the existing literature on a relevant topic) Developments in Endovascular and Endoscopic Surgery Selected Techniques (technical maneuvers) Historical Notes (interesting vignettes from the early days of vascular surgery) Editorials/Correspondence
期刊最新文献
Table of Contents On The Cover Table of Contents On The Cover Aortic Outcome after Implementation of a Treatment Strategy for Type B Aortic Dissection Involving the Aortic Arch.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1