Surrogate measures of first-phase insulin secretion versus reference methods intravenous glucose tolerance test and hyperglycemic clamp: a systematic review and meta-analyses.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004256
Rebecka Renklint, Youssef Chninou, Martin Heni, Andreas Fritsche, Hans-Ulrich Haering, Robert Wagner, Julia Otten
{"title":"Surrogate measures of first-phase insulin secretion versus reference methods intravenous glucose tolerance test and hyperglycemic clamp: a systematic review and meta-analyses.","authors":"Rebecka Renklint, Youssef Chninou, Martin Heni, Andreas Fritsche, Hans-Ulrich Haering, Robert Wagner, Julia Otten","doi":"10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004256","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>In this systematic review, we investigated the diagnostic accuracy of surrogate measures of insulin secretion based on fasting samples and the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The first phase of insulin secretion was calculated using two gold standard methods; the hyperglycemic clamp (HGC) test and intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT).</p><p><strong>Research design and methods: </strong>We conducted searches in the PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science databases, the last of which was conducted at the end of June 2021. Studies were included that measured first-phase insulin secretion in adults using both a gold-standard reference method (either HGC or IVGTT) and one or more surrogate measures from either fasting samples, OGTT or a meal-tolerance test. QUADAS-2, a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies, was used for quality assessment. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to examine the correlation between first-phase measured with gold standard and surrogate methods.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 33 articles, encompassing 5362 individuals with normal glucose tolerance, pre-diabetes or type 2 diabetes, were included in our systematic review. Homeostatic model assessment (HOMA)-beta and Insulinogenic Index 30 (IGI(30)) were the surrogate measures validated in the largest number of studies (17 and 13, respectively). HOMA-beta's pooled correlation to the reference methods was 0.48 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.56) The pooled correlation of IGI to the reference methods was 0.61 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.68). The surrogate measures with the highest correlation to the reference methods were Kadowaki (0.67 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.73)) and Stumvoll's first-phase secretion (0.65 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.71)), both calculated from an OGTT.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Surrogate measures from the first 30 min of an OGTT capture the first phase of insulin secretion and are a good choice for epidemiological studies. HOMA-beta has a moderate correlation to the reference methods but is not a measure of the first phase specifically.</p><p><strong>Prospero registration number: </strong>The meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (Id: CRD42020169064) before inclusion started.</p>","PeriodicalId":9151,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","volume":"12 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11268049/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjdrc-2024-004256","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: In this systematic review, we investigated the diagnostic accuracy of surrogate measures of insulin secretion based on fasting samples and the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT). The first phase of insulin secretion was calculated using two gold standard methods; the hyperglycemic clamp (HGC) test and intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT).

Research design and methods: We conducted searches in the PubMed, Cochrane Central, and Web of Science databases, the last of which was conducted at the end of June 2021. Studies were included that measured first-phase insulin secretion in adults using both a gold-standard reference method (either HGC or IVGTT) and one or more surrogate measures from either fasting samples, OGTT or a meal-tolerance test. QUADAS-2, a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies, was used for quality assessment. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to examine the correlation between first-phase measured with gold standard and surrogate methods.

Results: A total of 33 articles, encompassing 5362 individuals with normal glucose tolerance, pre-diabetes or type 2 diabetes, were included in our systematic review. Homeostatic model assessment (HOMA)-beta and Insulinogenic Index 30 (IGI(30)) were the surrogate measures validated in the largest number of studies (17 and 13, respectively). HOMA-beta's pooled correlation to the reference methods was 0.48 (95% CI 0.40 to 0.56) The pooled correlation of IGI to the reference methods was 0.61 (95% CI 0.54 to 0.68). The surrogate measures with the highest correlation to the reference methods were Kadowaki (0.67 (95% CI 0.61 to 0.73)) and Stumvoll's first-phase secretion (0.65 (95% CI 0.58 to 0.71)), both calculated from an OGTT.

Conclusions: Surrogate measures from the first 30 min of an OGTT capture the first phase of insulin secretion and are a good choice for epidemiological studies. HOMA-beta has a moderate correlation to the reference methods but is not a measure of the first phase specifically.

Prospero registration number: The meta-analysis was registered at PROSPERO (Id: CRD42020169064) before inclusion started.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
第一阶段胰岛素分泌的替代测量方法与参考方法静脉葡萄糖耐量试验和高血糖钳夹:系统综述和荟萃分析。
简介在这篇系统综述中,我们研究了基于空腹样本和口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)的胰岛素分泌替代指标的诊断准确性。第一阶段的胰岛素分泌是通过两种金标准方法计算得出的:高血糖钳夹(HGC)试验和静脉葡萄糖耐量试验(IVGTT):我们在 PubMed、Cochrane Central 和 Web of Science 数据库中进行了检索,最后一次检索是在 2021 年 6 月底进行的。研究纳入了使用黄金标准参考方法(HGC 或 IVGTT)和一种或多种来自空腹样本、OGTT 或耐餐试验的替代测量方法测量成人第一阶段胰岛素分泌的研究。QUADAS-2是诊断准确性研究质量评估的修订工具,用于质量评估。随机效应荟萃分析用于研究金标准和替代方法的第一阶段测量结果之间的相关性:我们的系统综述共纳入了 33 篇文章,涉及 5362 名糖耐量正常、糖尿病前期或 2 型糖尿病患者。静态模型评估(HOMA)-beta 和胰岛素生成指数 30(IGI(30))是最多研究(分别为 17 项和 13 项)验证的替代指标。HOMA-beta与参考方法的汇总相关性为0.48(95% CI为0.40至0.56),IGI与参考方法的汇总相关性为0.61(95% CI为0.54至0.68)。与参考方法相关性最高的替代指标是 Kadowaki(0.67(95% CI 0.61 至 0.73))和 Stumvoll 的第一阶段分泌量(0.65(95% CI 0.58 至 0.71)),这两个指标都是通过 OGTT 计算得出的:结论:OGTT 前 30 分钟的代用指标能捕捉到胰岛素分泌的第一阶段,是流行病学研究的良好选择。HOMA-beta与参考方法有适度的相关性,但并不是对第一阶段的专门测量:荟萃分析开始纳入前已在 PROSPERO 注册(编号:CRD42020169064)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care
BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care Medicine-Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism
CiteScore
9.30
自引率
2.40%
发文量
123
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊介绍: BMJ Open Diabetes Research & Care is an open access journal committed to publishing high-quality, basic and clinical research articles regarding type 1 and type 2 diabetes, and associated complications. Only original content will be accepted, and submissions are subject to rigorous peer review to ensure the publication of high-quality — and evidence-based — original research articles.
期刊最新文献
Clinical utility of novel diabetes subgroups in predicting vascular complications and mortality: up to 25 years of follow-up of the HUNT Study. Association between RDW-SD and prognosis across glycemic status in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Widening the phenotypic spectrum caused by pathogenic PDX1 variants in individuals with neonatal diabetes. Identification of atypical pediatric diabetes mellitus cases using electronic medical records. Type 2 diabetes complications in ethnic minority compared with European host populations: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1