Paediatric Anatomical Models in Radiotherapy Applications

IF 3.2 3区 医学 Q2 ONCOLOGY Clinical oncology Pub Date : 2024-06-26 DOI:10.1016/j.clon.2024.06.051
{"title":"Paediatric Anatomical Models in Radiotherapy Applications","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.clon.2024.06.051","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Anatomical models have key applications in radiotherapy, notably to help understand the relationship between radiation dose and risk of developing side effects. This review analyses whether age-specific computational phantoms, developed from healthy subjects and paediatric cancer patient data, are adequate to model a paediatric population. The phantoms used in the study were International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), 4D extended cardiac torso (XCAT) and Radiotherapy Paediatric Atlas (RT-PAL), which were also compared to literature data. Organ volume data for 19 organs was collected for all phantoms and literature. ICRP was treated as the reference for comparison, and percentage difference (P.D) for the other phantoms were calculated relative to ICRP. Overall comparisons were made for each age category (1, 5, 10, 15) and each organ. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel (version 16.59). The smallest P.D to ICRP was for Literature (-17.4%), closely followed by XCAT (26.6%). The largest was for RT-PAL (88.1%). The rectum had the largest average P.D (1,049.2%) and the large bowel had the smallest (2.0%). The P.D was 122.6% at age 1 but this decreased to 43.5% by age 15. Linear regression analysis showed a correlation between organ volume and age to be the strongest for ICRP (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.943) and weakest for XCAT (R<sup>2</sup> = 0.676). The phantoms are similar enough to ICRP for potential use in modelling paediatric populations. ICRP and XCAT could be used to model a healthy population, whereas RT-PAL could be used for a population undergoing/after radiotherapy.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":10403,"journal":{"name":"Clinical oncology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0936655524002759/pdfft?md5=7e6fecdd3145630c0e40ded025e5dcb8&pid=1-s2.0-S0936655524002759-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0936655524002759","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Anatomical models have key applications in radiotherapy, notably to help understand the relationship between radiation dose and risk of developing side effects. This review analyses whether age-specific computational phantoms, developed from healthy subjects and paediatric cancer patient data, are adequate to model a paediatric population. The phantoms used in the study were International Commission on Radiological Protection (ICRP), 4D extended cardiac torso (XCAT) and Radiotherapy Paediatric Atlas (RT-PAL), which were also compared to literature data. Organ volume data for 19 organs was collected for all phantoms and literature. ICRP was treated as the reference for comparison, and percentage difference (P.D) for the other phantoms were calculated relative to ICRP. Overall comparisons were made for each age category (1, 5, 10, 15) and each organ. Statistical analysis was performed using Microsoft Excel (version 16.59). The smallest P.D to ICRP was for Literature (-17.4%), closely followed by XCAT (26.6%). The largest was for RT-PAL (88.1%). The rectum had the largest average P.D (1,049.2%) and the large bowel had the smallest (2.0%). The P.D was 122.6% at age 1 but this decreased to 43.5% by age 15. Linear regression analysis showed a correlation between organ volume and age to be the strongest for ICRP (R2 = 0.943) and weakest for XCAT (R2 = 0.676). The phantoms are similar enough to ICRP for potential use in modelling paediatric populations. ICRP and XCAT could be used to model a healthy population, whereas RT-PAL could be used for a population undergoing/after radiotherapy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
放射治疗应用中的儿科解剖模型。
解剖模型在放射治疗中有着重要的应用,尤其有助于了解辐射剂量与副作用风险之间的关系。本综述分析了根据健康人和儿科癌症患者数据开发的特定年龄计算模型是否足以为儿科人群建模。研究中使用的模型是国际放射防护委员会(ICRP)、4D 扩展心脏躯干(XCAT)和放疗儿科图集(RT-PAL),并与文献数据进行了比较。收集了所有模型和文献中 19 个器官的体积数据。ICRP 被视为比较的参考,并计算了其他模型与 ICRP 的百分比差异(P.D)。对每个年龄组(1、5、10、15 岁)和每个器官进行总体比较。统计分析使用 Microsoft Excel(16.59 版)进行。与 ICRP 相比,P.D 值最小的是 Literature(-17.4%),紧随其后的是 XCAT(26.6%)。最大的是 RT-PAL(88.1%)。直肠的平均 P.D 最大(1,049.2%),大肠最小(2.0%)。1 岁时的 P.D 值为 122.6%,但到 15 岁时降至 43.5%。线性回归分析表明,ICRP 的器官体积与年龄的相关性最强(R2 = 0.943),XCAT 的相关性最弱(R2 = 0.676)。这些模型与 ICRP 足够相似,可用于儿科人群建模。ICRP 和 XCAT 可用来模拟健康人群,而 RT-PAL 可用来模拟正在接受放疗或放疗后的人群。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical oncology
Clinical oncology 医学-肿瘤学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
8.80%
发文量
332
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: Clinical Oncology is an International cancer journal covering all aspects of the clinical management of cancer patients, reflecting a multidisciplinary approach to therapy. Papers, editorials and reviews are published on all types of malignant disease embracing, pathology, diagnosis and treatment, including radiotherapy, chemotherapy, surgery, combined modality treatment and palliative care. Research and review papers covering epidemiology, radiobiology, radiation physics, tumour biology, and immunology are also published, together with letters to the editor, case reports and book reviews.
期刊最新文献
PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors in Combination With Chemo or as Monotherapy vs. Chemotherapy Alone in Advanced, Unresectable HER2-Negative Gastric, Gastroesophageal Junction, and Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: A Meta-Analysis. "If You're Talking, I Think You're Muted": Follow-up Analysis of Weekly Peer Review Discussion and Plan Changes After Transitioning From Virtual to In-Person Format. The Current use of Adaptive Strategies for External Beam Radiotherapy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review. The Use of Artificial Intelligence Technologies in Cancer Care. Response Letter to Laurelli et al. Letter to the Editor Regarding Enhancing Telemedicine to Improve Global Radiotherapy Access.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1