Systemic Immunomodulatory Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis: Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Update.

IF 11.5 1区 医学 Q1 DERMATOLOGY JAMA dermatology Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2192
Aaron M Drucker, Megan Lam, David Prieto-Merino, Rayka Malek, Alexandra G Ellis, Zenas Z N Yiu, Bram Rochwerg, Sonya Di Giorgio, Bernd W M Arents, Tanya Mohan, Tim Burton, Phyllis I Spuls, Jochen Schmitt, Carsten Flohr
{"title":"Systemic Immunomodulatory Treatments for Atopic Dermatitis: Living Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis Update.","authors":"Aaron M Drucker, Megan Lam, David Prieto-Merino, Rayka Malek, Alexandra G Ellis, Zenas Z N Yiu, Bram Rochwerg, Sonya Di Giorgio, Bernd W M Arents, Tanya Mohan, Tim Burton, Phyllis I Spuls, Jochen Schmitt, Carsten Flohr","doi":"10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2192","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>There are multiple approved systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis. Lebrikizumab is a newly licensed biologic medication that has been compared to placebo in clinical trials but not to other systemic treatments.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To compare reported measures of efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab to other systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis in a living systematic review and network meta-analysis.</p><p><strong>Data sources: </strong>The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, the Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database, the Global Resource of Eczema Trials database, and trial registries were searched from inception through November 3, 2023.</p><p><strong>Study selection: </strong>Randomized clinical trials evaluating 8 or more weeks of treatment with systemic immunomodulatory medications for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened in duplicate.</p><p><strong>Data extraction and synthesis: </strong>Data were abstracted in duplicate and random-effects bayesian network meta-analyses were performed. Minimal important differences were used to define important differences between medications. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). The updated analysis was completed from December 13, 2023, to February 20, 2024.</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Efficacy outcomes were the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scales (PP-NRS) and were compared using mean difference (MD) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Safety outcomes were serious adverse events and withdrawal due to adverse events. Other outcomes included the proportion of participants with 50%, 75%, and 90% improvement in EASI (EASI-50, -75, -90) and the proportion with success on the Investigator Global Assessment compared using odds ratios with 95% CrI.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The study sample included 97 eligible trials, with a total of 24 679 patients. Lebrikizumab was associated with no important difference in change in EASI (MD, -2.0; 95% CrI, -4.5 to 0.3; moderate certainty), POEM (MD, -1.1; 95% CrI -2.5 to 0.2; moderate certainty), DLQI (MD, -0.2; 95% CrI -2.1 to 1.6; moderate certainty), or PP-NRS (MD, 0.1; 95% CrI -0.4, 0.6; high certainty) compared to dupilumab among adults with atopic dermatitis who were treated for up to 16 weeks. Dupilumab was associated with higher odds of efficacy in binary outcomes compared with lebrikizumab. The relative efficacy of other approved systemic medications was similar to that found by previous updates of this living study, with high-dose upadacitinib and abrocitinib demonstrating numerically highest relative efficacy. For safety outcomes, low event rates limited useful comparisons.</p><p><strong>Conclusions and relevance: </strong>In this living systematic review and network meta-analysis, lebrikizumab was similarly effective to dupilumab for the short-term treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults. Clinicians and patients can use these comparative data to inform treatment decisions.</p>","PeriodicalId":14734,"journal":{"name":"JAMA dermatology","volume":" ","pages":"936-944"},"PeriodicalIF":11.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11255974/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMA dermatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1001/jamadermatol.2024.2192","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: There are multiple approved systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis. Lebrikizumab is a newly licensed biologic medication that has been compared to placebo in clinical trials but not to other systemic treatments.

Objective: To compare reported measures of efficacy and safety of lebrikizumab to other systemic treatments for atopic dermatitis in a living systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Data sources: The Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, MEDLINE, Embase, the Latin American and Caribbean Health Science Information database, the Global Resource of Eczema Trials database, and trial registries were searched from inception through November 3, 2023.

Study selection: Randomized clinical trials evaluating 8 or more weeks of treatment with systemic immunomodulatory medications for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis. Titles, abstracts, and full texts were screened in duplicate.

Data extraction and synthesis: Data were abstracted in duplicate and random-effects bayesian network meta-analyses were performed. Minimal important differences were used to define important differences between medications. Certainty of evidence was assessed using the GRADE approach (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). The updated analysis was completed from December 13, 2023, to February 20, 2024.

Main outcome measures: Efficacy outcomes were the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), the Patient Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM) Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), and Peak Pruritus Numeric Rating Scales (PP-NRS) and were compared using mean difference (MD) with 95% credible intervals (CrI). Safety outcomes were serious adverse events and withdrawal due to adverse events. Other outcomes included the proportion of participants with 50%, 75%, and 90% improvement in EASI (EASI-50, -75, -90) and the proportion with success on the Investigator Global Assessment compared using odds ratios with 95% CrI.

Results: The study sample included 97 eligible trials, with a total of 24 679 patients. Lebrikizumab was associated with no important difference in change in EASI (MD, -2.0; 95% CrI, -4.5 to 0.3; moderate certainty), POEM (MD, -1.1; 95% CrI -2.5 to 0.2; moderate certainty), DLQI (MD, -0.2; 95% CrI -2.1 to 1.6; moderate certainty), or PP-NRS (MD, 0.1; 95% CrI -0.4, 0.6; high certainty) compared to dupilumab among adults with atopic dermatitis who were treated for up to 16 weeks. Dupilumab was associated with higher odds of efficacy in binary outcomes compared with lebrikizumab. The relative efficacy of other approved systemic medications was similar to that found by previous updates of this living study, with high-dose upadacitinib and abrocitinib demonstrating numerically highest relative efficacy. For safety outcomes, low event rates limited useful comparisons.

Conclusions and relevance: In this living systematic review and network meta-analysis, lebrikizumab was similarly effective to dupilumab for the short-term treatment of atopic dermatitis in adults. Clinicians and patients can use these comparative data to inform treatment decisions.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
特应性皮炎的全身免疫调节治疗:生活系统综述和网络元分析更新。
重要性:特应性皮炎有多种已获批准的系统治疗方法。来曲珠单抗是一种新获批的生物制剂药物,在临床试验中曾与安慰剂进行过比较,但未与其他系统性治疗方法进行过比较:在一项活体系统综述和网络荟萃分析中,比较来曲珠单抗与其他特应性皮炎系统治疗方法的疗效和安全性:检索了从开始到2023年11月3日的Cochrane对照试验中央注册、MEDLINE、Embase、拉丁美洲和加勒比海健康科学信息数据库、全球湿疹试验资源数据库以及试验登记处:研究选择:评估使用全身性免疫调节药物治疗中重度特应性皮炎 8 周或更长时间的随机临床试验。对标题、摘要和全文进行一式两份的筛选:一式两份数据摘要,并进行随机效应贝叶斯网络荟萃分析。使用最小重要差异来定义药物之间的重要差异。采用 GRADE 方法(建议评估、发展和评价分级)评估证据的确定性。更新分析于 2023 年 12 月 13 日至 2024 年 2 月 20 日完成:疗效结果为湿疹面积和严重程度指数(EASI)、患者导向湿疹测量法(POEM)、皮肤科生活质量指数(DLQI)和瘙痒峰值数字评分量表(PP-NRS),采用平均差(MD)和95%可信区间(CrI)进行比较。安全性结果包括严重不良事件和因不良事件退出治疗。其他结果包括EASI(EASI-50、-75、-90)分别改善50%、75%和90%的参与者比例,以及采用赔率比和95%可信区间(CrI)比较的研究者全球评估成功比例:研究样本包括98项符合条件的试验,共计24 707名患者。莱布曲珠单抗与 EASI(MD,-2.0;95% CrI,-4.5 至 0.3;中等确定性)、POEM(MD,-1.1;95% CrI,-2.5 至 0.2;中等确定性)、DLQI(MD,-0.2;95% CrI -2.1至1.6;中度确定性)或PP-NRS(MD,0.1;95% CrI -0.4至0.6;高度确定性)。与来布利珠单抗相比,杜匹鲁单抗在二元结果中的有效几率更高。其他已获批准的全身用药的相对疗效与这项在世研究之前更新的结果相似,其中大剂量的乌达替尼和阿罗西替尼的相对疗效最高。在安全性结果方面,低事件发生率限制了有用的比较:在这项活系统综述和网络荟萃分析中,在短期治疗成人特应性皮炎方面,来布瑞珠单抗与杜比鲁单抗的疗效相似。临床医生和患者可以利用这些比较数据为治疗决策提供依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
JAMA dermatology
JAMA dermatology DERMATOLOGY-
CiteScore
14.10
自引率
5.50%
发文量
300
期刊介绍: JAMA Dermatology is an international peer-reviewed journal that has been in continuous publication since 1882. It began publication by the American Medical Association in 1920 as Archives of Dermatology and Syphilology. The journal publishes material that helps in the development and testing of the effectiveness of diagnosis and treatment in medical and surgical dermatology, pediatric and geriatric dermatology, and oncologic and aesthetic dermatologic surgery. JAMA Dermatology is a member of the JAMA Network, a consortium of peer-reviewed, general medical and specialty publications. It is published online weekly, every Wednesday, and in 12 print/online issues a year. The mission of the journal is to elevate the art and science of health and diseases of skin, hair, nails, and mucous membranes, and their treatment, with the aim of enabling dermatologists to deliver evidence-based, high-value medical and surgical dermatologic care. The journal publishes a broad range of innovative studies and trials that shift research and clinical practice paradigms, expand the understanding of the burden of dermatologic diseases and key outcomes, improve the practice of dermatology, and ensure equitable care to all patients. It also features research and opinion examining ethical, moral, socioeconomic, educational, and political issues relevant to dermatologists, aiming to enable ongoing improvement to the workforce, scope of practice, and the training of future dermatologists. JAMA Dermatology aims to be a leader in developing initiatives to improve diversity, equity, and inclusion within the specialty and within dermatology medical publishing.
期刊最新文献
Annular Eroded Plaque With Honey-Colored Crusting On Scrotum. Error in Figure 2. Low-Dose Oral Minoxidil Initiation for Patients With Hair Loss: An International Modified Delphi Consensus Statement. Salt and Atopic Dermatitis. Salt and Atopic Dermatitis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1