Parent Perspectives on Social Risk Screening in the PICU.

IF 4 2区 医学 Q1 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE Pediatric Critical Care Medicine Pub Date : 2024-10-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1097/PCC.0000000000003580
Rebecca A Asp, Erin T Paquette
{"title":"Parent Perspectives on Social Risk Screening in the PICU.","authors":"Rebecca A Asp, Erin T Paquette","doi":"10.1097/PCC.0000000000003580","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Health inequities are widespread and associated with avoidable poor health outcomes. In the PICU, we are increasingly understanding how health inequities relate to critical illness and health outcomes. Experts recommend assessing for health inequities by screening for social determinants of health (SDOH) and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs); however, guidance on screening is limited and screening has not been universally implemented. Our study aimed to understand parent perspectives on screening for SDOH/ACEs in the PICU, with the primary objective of determining whether screening would be acceptable in this setting.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of eleven PICU parents between November 2021 and January 2022.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Urban, quaternary free-standing children's hospital.</p><p><strong>Subjects: </strong>Parents of children with a PICU hospitalization between November 2020 and October 2021.</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>Domains of interest included experience with and attitudes toward SDOH/ACEs screening, perspectives on addressing needs with/without resources and their relationship to health, and recommendations for screening. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded with an inductive approach using thematic analysis and constant comparative methods. Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Institutional Review Board approved this study (2021- 4781, Approved September 13, 2021). Ten participants found SDOH/ACEs screening to be acceptable and valuable in the PICU, even for topics without a readily available resource. Participants did not have broad experience with ACEs screening, though all believed this provided the medical team with valuable context regarding their child. Ten participants recommended screening occur after their child has been stabilized and that they are notified that screening is universal.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Participants found screening for SDOH/ACES to be acceptable and valuable in the PICU. Families have important insight that should be leveraged to improve the support of unmet needs through the development of strengths-based, parent-informed screening initiatives.</p>","PeriodicalId":19760,"journal":{"name":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pediatric Critical Care Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/PCC.0000000000003580","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Health inequities are widespread and associated with avoidable poor health outcomes. In the PICU, we are increasingly understanding how health inequities relate to critical illness and health outcomes. Experts recommend assessing for health inequities by screening for social determinants of health (SDOH) and adverse childhood experiences (ACEs); however, guidance on screening is limited and screening has not been universally implemented. Our study aimed to understand parent perspectives on screening for SDOH/ACEs in the PICU, with the primary objective of determining whether screening would be acceptable in this setting.

Design: We conducted a qualitative study using semistructured interviews with a convenience sample of eleven PICU parents between November 2021 and January 2022.

Setting: Urban, quaternary free-standing children's hospital.

Subjects: Parents of children with a PICU hospitalization between November 2020 and October 2021.

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: Domains of interest included experience with and attitudes toward SDOH/ACEs screening, perspectives on addressing needs with/without resources and their relationship to health, and recommendations for screening. Interviews were transcribed verbatim and coded with an inductive approach using thematic analysis and constant comparative methods. Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Institutional Review Board approved this study (2021- 4781, Approved September 13, 2021). Ten participants found SDOH/ACEs screening to be acceptable and valuable in the PICU, even for topics without a readily available resource. Participants did not have broad experience with ACEs screening, though all believed this provided the medical team with valuable context regarding their child. Ten participants recommended screening occur after their child has been stabilized and that they are notified that screening is universal.

Conclusions: Participants found screening for SDOH/ACES to be acceptable and valuable in the PICU. Families have important insight that should be leveraged to improve the support of unmet needs through the development of strengths-based, parent-informed screening initiatives.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
家长对儿童重症监护室社会风险筛查的看法。
目标:健康不公平现象十分普遍,并与可避免的不良健康后果相关联。在重症监护病房,我们越来越多地了解到健康不平等与危重疾病和健康结果之间的关系。专家建议通过筛查健康的社会决定因素(SDOH)和童年不良经历(ACE)来评估健康不平等;然而,筛查指南很有限,筛查也没有得到普遍实施。我们的研究旨在了解家长对儿童重症监护病房(PICU)中 SDOH/ACE筛查的看法,主要目的是确定在这种情况下筛查是否可以接受:我们在 2021 年 11 月至 2022 年 1 月期间对 11 名 PICU 家长进行了半结构式访谈,这是一项定性研究:城市:四级独立儿童医院:干预措施:无:测量和主要结果相关领域包括对 SDOH/ACE 筛查的经验和态度、对利用/不利用资源满足需求的看法及其与健康的关系,以及对筛查的建议。对访谈内容进行了逐字记录,并采用主题分析和恒定比较法对访谈内容进行了归纳编码。Ann & Robert H. Lurie 儿童机构审查委员会批准了本研究(2021- 4781,2021 年 9 月 13 日批准)。十位参与者认为,SDOH/ACE 筛查在 PICU 中是可以接受且有价值的,即使是对于没有现成资源的主题也是如此。尽管所有参与者都认为 ACE 筛查为医疗团队提供了有关其子女的宝贵背景资料,但他们在 ACE 筛查方面并没有广泛的经验。十位参与者建议在患儿病情稳定后进行筛查,并通知他们筛查是普遍性的:与会者认为,在重症监护病房进行 SDOH/ACES 筛查是可以接受的,也是有价值的。家庭具有重要的洞察力,应利用这些洞察力,通过制定以优势为基础、家长知情的筛查计划,改善对未满足需求的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine 医学-危重病医学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
14.60%
发文量
991
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Pediatric Critical Care Medicine is written for the entire critical care team: pediatricians, neonatologists, respiratory therapists, nurses, and others who deal with pediatric patients who are critically ill or injured. International in scope, with editorial board members and contributors from around the world, the Journal includes a full range of scientific content, including clinical articles, scientific investigations, solicited reviews, and abstracts from pediatric critical care meetings. Additionally, the Journal includes abstracts of selected articles published in Chinese, French, Italian, Japanese, Portuguese, and Spanish translations - making news of advances in the field available to pediatric and neonatal intensive care practitioners worldwide.
期刊最新文献
The 2024 Pediatric Sepsis Challenge: Predicting In-Hospital Mortality in Children With Suspected Sepsis in Uganda. The Power of Goodbyes. Evolution and Impact of a Diagnostic Point-of-Care Ultrasound Program in a PICU. Evaluation of a Comprehensive Algorithm for PICU Patients With New Fever or Instability: Association of Clinical Decision Support With Testing Practices. Pediatric Hematology and Oncology Patients on Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Outcomes in a Multicenter, Retrospective Cohort, 2009-2021.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1