Daily physical activity in older adults across levels of care: the HUNT Trondheim 70 + study.

IF 3.7 1区 医学 Q2 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY European Review of Aging and Physical Activity Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1186/s11556-024-00355-6
Astrid Ustad, Karen Sverdrup, Gro Gujord Tangen, Øystein Døhl, Beatrix Vereijken, Pernille Thingstad, Nina Skjæret-Maroni
{"title":"Daily physical activity in older adults across levels of care: the HUNT Trondheim 70 + study.","authors":"Astrid Ustad, Karen Sverdrup, Gro Gujord Tangen, Øystein Døhl, Beatrix Vereijken, Pernille Thingstad, Nina Skjæret-Maroni","doi":"10.1186/s11556-024-00355-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Physical activity (PA) is imperative for healthy ageing and is a modifiable lifestyle factor. Accurate, clinically meaningful estimates of daily PA among older adults can inform targeted interventions to maintain function and independence. This study describes daily PA in older adults across levels of care as a first step contributing to the limited evidence on potential associations between PA and the use of care services.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study used data from the Trondheim 70 + cohort in the population-based Norwegian HUNT Study. In total, 1042 participants aged 70 years or older with valid activity data were included. PA was assessed using two accelerometers over 7 consecutive days and was classified into PA (walking, standing, running, and cycling) and sedentary behavior (sitting and lying). Data on received care services were retrieved from municipal registers and participants were classified into four levels of care: 1) independently living (81.9%), 2) independently living with low-level home care services (6.5%), 3) recipients of home care services (6.0%), and 4) nursing home residents (5.7%). Time spent in the activity types and duration of bouts are presented across levels of care.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Participants mean age was 77.5 years (range: 70.1-105.4, 55% female) and PA was lower with higher age. Across levels of care, significant group differences were found in the total time spent in PA, particularly in walking and standing. Daily PA, duration of active bouts, and number of daily walking bouts were lower for participants receiving higher levels of care. Standing was the dominant type of PA and walking appeared predominantly in short bouts at all care levels.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>This is the first population-based study using device-measured PA to describe daily PA across levels of care. The results showed that low-intensity activities constitute the primary component of everyday PA, advocating for placing greater emphasis on the significant role these activities play in maintaining daily PA at older age. Furthermore, the study demonstrated that activity types and bout durations are related to the ability to live independently among older adults. Overall, these findings can contribute to better target interventions to maintain function and independence in older adults.</p>","PeriodicalId":50477,"journal":{"name":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11253329/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Review of Aging and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s11556-024-00355-6","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Physical activity (PA) is imperative for healthy ageing and is a modifiable lifestyle factor. Accurate, clinically meaningful estimates of daily PA among older adults can inform targeted interventions to maintain function and independence. This study describes daily PA in older adults across levels of care as a first step contributing to the limited evidence on potential associations between PA and the use of care services.

Methods: This study used data from the Trondheim 70 + cohort in the population-based Norwegian HUNT Study. In total, 1042 participants aged 70 years or older with valid activity data were included. PA was assessed using two accelerometers over 7 consecutive days and was classified into PA (walking, standing, running, and cycling) and sedentary behavior (sitting and lying). Data on received care services were retrieved from municipal registers and participants were classified into four levels of care: 1) independently living (81.9%), 2) independently living with low-level home care services (6.5%), 3) recipients of home care services (6.0%), and 4) nursing home residents (5.7%). Time spent in the activity types and duration of bouts are presented across levels of care.

Results: Participants mean age was 77.5 years (range: 70.1-105.4, 55% female) and PA was lower with higher age. Across levels of care, significant group differences were found in the total time spent in PA, particularly in walking and standing. Daily PA, duration of active bouts, and number of daily walking bouts were lower for participants receiving higher levels of care. Standing was the dominant type of PA and walking appeared predominantly in short bouts at all care levels.

Conclusions: This is the first population-based study using device-measured PA to describe daily PA across levels of care. The results showed that low-intensity activities constitute the primary component of everyday PA, advocating for placing greater emphasis on the significant role these activities play in maintaining daily PA at older age. Furthermore, the study demonstrated that activity types and bout durations are related to the ability to live independently among older adults. Overall, these findings can contribute to better target interventions to maintain function and independence in older adults.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同护理级别老年人的日常体育活动:HUNT 特隆赫姆 70 + 研究。
背景:体力活动(PA)是健康老龄化的必要条件,也是一种可改变的生活方式因素。对老年人的日常体力活动进行准确的、有临床意义的估计,可以为有针对性的干预措施提供信息,以保持老年人的功能和独立性。本研究描述了不同护理级别的老年人的日常运动量,作为对运动量与护理服务使用之间潜在联系的有限证据的第一步贡献:这项研究使用了基于人口的挪威 HUNT 研究中特隆赫姆 70 岁以上人群的数据。共有1042名70岁或70岁以上、拥有有效活动数据的参与者参与了这项研究。活动量使用两个加速度计对连续7天的活动量进行评估,并分为活动量(步行、站立、跑步和骑自行车)和久坐行为(坐和躺)。接受护理服务的数据来自市政登记册,参与者被分为四个护理级别:1)独立生活(81.9%);2)独立生活并接受低水平家庭护理服务(6.5%);3)接受家庭护理服务(6.0%);4)入住养老院(5.7%)。结果显示了不同护理级别的活动类型所花费的时间和活动持续时间:参与者的平均年龄为 77.5 岁(范围:70.1-105.4,55% 为女性),年龄越大,PA 越低。在不同护理级别中,总的活动时间,尤其是步行和站立的活动时间存在明显的群体差异。在接受较高水平护理的参与者中,每日活动量、活动持续时间和每日步行次数均较低。在所有护理级别中,站立是主要的活动时间类型,而步行主要是短时间的活动:这是第一项基于人群的研究,使用设备测量的 PA 来描述不同护理级别的日常 PA。研究结果表明,低强度的活动是日常活动量的主要组成部分,因此应更加重视这些活动在老年人维持日常活动量方面的重要作用。此外,研究还表明,活动类型和持续时间与老年人独立生活的能力有关。总之,这些发现有助于更好地采取有针对性的干预措施,以保持老年人的功能和独立性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.60
自引率
1.60%
发文量
29
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: European Review of Aging and Physical Activity (EURAPA) disseminates research on the biomedical and behavioural aspects of physical activity and aging. The main issues addressed by EURAPA are the impact of physical activity or exercise on cognitive, physical, and psycho-social functioning of older people, physical activity patterns in advanced age, and the relationship between physical activity and health.
期刊最新文献
Reliable measures of rest-activity rhythm fragmentation: how many days are needed? Effectiveness of community-based Baduanjin exercise intervention for older adults with varying frailty status: a randomized controlled trial. Optimal lifestyle patterns for delaying ageing and reducing all-cause mortality: insights from the UK Biobank. Combined influence of physical activity and C-reactive protein to albumin ratio on mortality among older cancer survivors in the United States: a prospective cohort study. Vitality at home: a phenomenological study of tele-exercise in women aged 80 and older
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1