Neuropsychological functioning after COVID-19: minor differences between individuals with and without persistent complaints after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

IF 3 3区 心理学 Q2 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY Clinical Neuropsychologist Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1080/13854046.2024.2379508
Anouk Verveen, Sander C J Verfaillie, Denise Visser, Dook W Koch, Esmée Verwijk, Gert J Geurtsen, Jeroen Roor, Brent Appelman, Ronald Boellaard, Caroline M van Heugten, Janneke Horn, Hanneke E Hulst, Menno D de Jong, Tanja A Kuut, Tessa van der Maaden, Yvonne M G van Os, Maria Prins, Johanna M A Visser-Meily, Michele van Vugt, Cees C van den Wijngaard, Pythia T Nieuwkerk, Bart van Berckel, Nelleke Tolboom, Hans Knoop
{"title":"Neuropsychological functioning after COVID-19: minor differences between individuals with and without persistent complaints after SARS-CoV-2 infection.","authors":"Anouk Verveen, Sander C J Verfaillie, Denise Visser, Dook W Koch, Esmée Verwijk, Gert J Geurtsen, Jeroen Roor, Brent Appelman, Ronald Boellaard, Caroline M van Heugten, Janneke Horn, Hanneke E Hulst, Menno D de Jong, Tanja A Kuut, Tessa van der Maaden, Yvonne M G van Os, Maria Prins, Johanna M A Visser-Meily, Michele van Vugt, Cees C van den Wijngaard, Pythia T Nieuwkerk, Bart van Berckel, Nelleke Tolboom, Hans Knoop","doi":"10.1080/13854046.2024.2379508","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Objective:</b> It is unclear how self-reported severe fatigue and difficulty concentrating after SARS-CoV-2 infection relate to objective neuropsychological functioning. The study aimed to compare neuropsychological functioning between individuals with and without these persistent subjective complaints. <b>Method</b>: Individuals with and without persistent severe fatigue (Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) fatigue ≥ 35) and difficulty concentrating (CIS concentration ≥ 18) at least 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. Neuropsychological assessment was performed on overall cognitive functioning, attention, processing speed, executive functioning, memory, visuo-construction, and language (18 tests). T-scores -1.5 SD below population normative data (<i>T</i> ≤ 35) were classified as \"impaired\". <b>Results:</b> 230 participants were included in the study, of whom 22 were excluded from the analysis due to invalid performance. Of the participants included in the analysis, 111 reported persistent complaints of severe fatigue and difficulty concentrating and 97 did not. Median age was 54 years, 59% (<i>n</i> = 126) were female, and participants were assessed a median of 23 months after first infection (IQR: 16-28). With bivariate logistic regression, individuals with persistent complaints had an increased likelihood of slower information processing speed performance on the Stroop word reading (OR = 2.45, 95%CI = 1.02-5.84) compared to those without persistent complaints. Demographic or clinical covariates (e.g. hospitalization) did not influence this association. With linear regression techniques, persistent complaints were associated with lower t-scores on the D2 CP, TMT B, and TMT B|A. There were no differences in performance on the other neuropsychological tests. <b>Conclusions:</b> Individuals with subjective severe fatigue and difficulty concentrating after COVID-19 do not typically demonstrate cognitive impairment on extensive neuropsychological testing.</p>","PeriodicalId":55250,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","volume":" ","pages":"1-16"},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Neuropsychologist","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13854046.2024.2379508","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: It is unclear how self-reported severe fatigue and difficulty concentrating after SARS-CoV-2 infection relate to objective neuropsychological functioning. The study aimed to compare neuropsychological functioning between individuals with and without these persistent subjective complaints. Method: Individuals with and without persistent severe fatigue (Checklist Individual Strength (CIS) fatigue ≥ 35) and difficulty concentrating (CIS concentration ≥ 18) at least 3 months after SARS-CoV-2 infection were included. Neuropsychological assessment was performed on overall cognitive functioning, attention, processing speed, executive functioning, memory, visuo-construction, and language (18 tests). T-scores -1.5 SD below population normative data (T ≤ 35) were classified as "impaired". Results: 230 participants were included in the study, of whom 22 were excluded from the analysis due to invalid performance. Of the participants included in the analysis, 111 reported persistent complaints of severe fatigue and difficulty concentrating and 97 did not. Median age was 54 years, 59% (n = 126) were female, and participants were assessed a median of 23 months after first infection (IQR: 16-28). With bivariate logistic regression, individuals with persistent complaints had an increased likelihood of slower information processing speed performance on the Stroop word reading (OR = 2.45, 95%CI = 1.02-5.84) compared to those without persistent complaints. Demographic or clinical covariates (e.g. hospitalization) did not influence this association. With linear regression techniques, persistent complaints were associated with lower t-scores on the D2 CP, TMT B, and TMT B|A. There were no differences in performance on the other neuropsychological tests. Conclusions: Individuals with subjective severe fatigue and difficulty concentrating after COVID-19 do not typically demonstrate cognitive impairment on extensive neuropsychological testing.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19 后的神经心理功能:SARS-CoV-2 感染后有持续症状和无持续症状者之间的微小差异。
目的:目前尚不清楚感染 SARS-CoV-2 后自我报告的严重疲劳和注意力难以集中与客观神经心理功能之间的关系。本研究旨在比较有和没有这些持续性主观症状的人的神经心理功能。研究方法研究对象包括感染 SARS-CoV-2 至少 3 个月后出现和未出现持续性严重疲劳(疲劳程度检查表(CIS)≥ 35)和注意力难以集中(注意力集中程度检查表(CIS)≥ 18)的个体。对总体认知功能、注意力、处理速度、执行功能、记忆力、视觉建构和语言(18 项测试)进行了神经心理学评估。T值低于人群常模数据-1.5 SD(T ≤ 35)的被列为 "受损"。结果:230 人参加了研究,其中 22 人因成绩无效而被排除在分析之外。在纳入分析的参与者中,111 人报告了持续严重疲劳和难以集中注意力的主诉,97 人未报告。中位年龄为 54 岁,59%(n = 126)为女性,首次感染后接受评估的时间中位数为 23 个月(IQR:16-28)。通过双变量逻辑回归发现,与无持续性主诉的人相比,有持续性主诉的人在Stroop单词阅读中信息处理速度较慢的可能性更大(OR = 2.45,95%CI = 1.02-5.84)。人口统计学或临床协变量(如住院)并不影响这种关联。通过线性回归技术,持续主诉与较低的 D2 CP、TMT B 和 TMT B|A t 分数相关。其他神经心理测试的成绩没有差异。结论COVID-19 后出现主观严重疲劳和注意力难以集中的患者通常不会在广泛的神经心理学测试中表现出认知障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Clinical Neuropsychologist
Clinical Neuropsychologist 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
8.40
自引率
12.80%
发文量
61
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Clinical Neuropsychologist (TCN) serves as the premier forum for (1) state-of-the-art clinically-relevant scientific research, (2) in-depth professional discussions of matters germane to evidence-based practice, and (3) clinical case studies in neuropsychology. Of particular interest are papers that can make definitive statements about a given topic (thereby having implications for the standards of clinical practice) and those with the potential to expand today’s clinical frontiers. Research on all age groups, and on both clinical and normal populations, is considered.
期刊最新文献
Development of a Symptom Validity Index for the Beck Anxiety Inventory. Interpreting the direct- and derived-Trail Making Test scores in Argentinian children: regression-based norms, convergent validity, test-retest reliability, and practice effects. Enhanced detection of suboptimal effort in psychoeducational assessments for dyslexia. Neuropsychological normative standards for late career physicians. Naturalistic assessment of everyday multitasking in Parkinson's disease with and without mild cognitive impairment.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1