Occurrence of neurosensory disturbance after the use of articaine and lidocaine in the inferior alveolar nerve block: a double-blind randomised clinical trial

IF 1.9 4区 医学 Q3 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery Pub Date : 2024-09-01 Epub Date: 2024-06-25 DOI:10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.06.006
Reza Tabrizi , Amir Mazidi , Hadi Sharifzadeh , Hooman Khanzadeh , Ali Azadi
{"title":"Occurrence of neurosensory disturbance after the use of articaine and lidocaine in the inferior alveolar nerve block: a double-blind randomised clinical trial","authors":"Reza Tabrizi ,&nbsp;Amir Mazidi ,&nbsp;Hadi Sharifzadeh ,&nbsp;Hooman Khanzadeh ,&nbsp;Ali Azadi","doi":"10.1016/j.bjoms.2024.06.006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p><span><span>This double-blind, randomised clinical trial aimed to find out whether there is a difference in the prevalence of neurosensory disturbance (NSD) between patients who received 2% lidocaine and those who received 4% </span>articaine<span> during inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANBs). Patients who underwent </span></span>third molar<span> extraction were randomised into two groups. IANB was performed using 2% lidocaine in Group 1 and 4% articaine in Group 2. The occurrence of NSD was documented. Patients were visited within 48 hours and one week after the tooth was removed. The type of anaesthetic drug (4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine) was the study’s predictive factor. A total of 2400 patients were studied in two groups (1200 in each group). The mean (range) age of the patients was 28.40 (18–44) years. Five patients (0.41%) in the lidocaine group and seven (0.58%) in the articaine group had NSD after injection (p = 0.77). The prevalence of NSD after IANB was no higher in the articaine group than in the lidocaine group.</span></p></div>","PeriodicalId":55318,"journal":{"name":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","volume":"62 7","pages":"Pages 637-641"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"British Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0266435624001529","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/6/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This double-blind, randomised clinical trial aimed to find out whether there is a difference in the prevalence of neurosensory disturbance (NSD) between patients who received 2% lidocaine and those who received 4% articaine during inferior alveolar nerve blocks (IANBs). Patients who underwent third molar extraction were randomised into two groups. IANB was performed using 2% lidocaine in Group 1 and 4% articaine in Group 2. The occurrence of NSD was documented. Patients were visited within 48 hours and one week after the tooth was removed. The type of anaesthetic drug (4% articaine versus 2% lidocaine) was the study’s predictive factor. A total of 2400 patients were studied in two groups (1200 in each group). The mean (range) age of the patients was 28.40 (18–44) years. Five patients (0.41%) in the lidocaine group and seven (0.58%) in the articaine group had NSD after injection (p = 0.77). The prevalence of NSD after IANB was no higher in the articaine group than in the lidocaine group.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
下牙槽神经阻滞术中使用阿替卡因和利多卡因后出现的神经感觉障碍:一项双盲随机临床试验。
这项双盲随机临床试验旨在了解在下牙槽神经阻滞(IANB)过程中,接受 2% 利多卡因治疗的患者与接受 4% 阿替卡因治疗的患者在神经感觉障碍(NSD)发生率方面是否存在差异。接受第三磨牙拔除术的患者被随机分为两组。第一组使用 2% 利多卡因进行下牙槽神经阻滞,第二组使用 4% 阿替卡因进行下牙槽神经阻滞,并记录下 NSD 的发生情况。在拔牙 48 小时内和一周后对患者进行回访。麻醉药物的类型(4% 阿替卡因与 2% 利多卡因)是研究的预测因素。两组共研究了 2400 名患者(每组 1200 人)。患者的平均年龄(范围)为 28.40(18-44)岁。利多卡因组和阿替卡因组分别有 5 名(0.41%)和 7 名(0.58%)患者在注射后出现 NSD(P = 0.77)。阿替卡因组注射 IANB 后 NSD 的发生率不高于利多卡因组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
16.70%
发文量
256
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Journal of the British Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons: • Leading articles on all aspects of surgery in the oro-facial and head and neck region • One of the largest circulations of any international journal in this field • Dedicated to enhancing surgical expertise.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Comment on “Deep neck infections: a single-centre analysis of 100 cases in the West of Scotland” The Birmingham mandible and midface rules: final data analysis Epidemiological review of ten years performing Mohs micrographic surgery by a single surgeon Are resorbable plating systems comparable to conventional titanium plating in paediatric maxillofacial trauma patients? A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1