Impact of post-hepatectomy biliary leaks on long-term survival in different liver tumors: A single institute experience.

IF 1.1 Q4 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.14701/ahbps.24-078
Devesh Sanjeev Ballal, Shraddha Patkar, Aditya Kunte, Sridhar Sundaram, Nitin Shetty, Kunal Gala, Suyash Kulkarni, Mahesh Goel
{"title":"Impact of post-hepatectomy biliary leaks on long-term survival in different liver tumors: A single institute experience.","authors":"Devesh Sanjeev Ballal, Shraddha Patkar, Aditya Kunte, Sridhar Sundaram, Nitin Shetty, Kunal Gala, Suyash Kulkarni, Mahesh Goel","doi":"10.14701/ahbps.24-078","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Backgrounds/aims: </strong>A postoperative biliary leak is one of the most morbid complications occurring after a liver resection, the long-term impact of which remains unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Retrospective analysis of consecutive liver resections performed from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2021. Primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) was compared between patients with and without a bile leak, stratifying for tumor type. Survival curves were plotted using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and differences between them were analyzed using the log-rank test.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In toto, 862 patients were analyzed, and included 306 (35.5%) hepatocellular carcinomas, 212 (24.6%) metastatic colorectal cancers, and 111 (12.9%) cholangiocarcinomas (69 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, 42 hilar cholangiocarcinomas). Occurrence of a bile leak was associated with significantly poorer DFS only in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (median DFS 9.9 months vs. 24.9 months, <i>p</i> = 0.013), and further analysis was restricted to this cohort. A Cox regression performed for factors associated with DFS detriment in patients with cholangiocarcinoma showed that apart from node positivity (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.482, <i>p</i> = 0.033) and margin positivity (HR: 2.65, <i>p</i> = 0.021), development of a bile leak was independently associated with worsening DFS on both univariate and multiple regression analyses (HR: 1.896, <i>p</i> = 0.033).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Post-hepatectomy biliary leaks are associated with significantly poorer DFS only in patients with cholangiocarcinoma, but not in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods to mitigate this survival detriment need to be explored.</p>","PeriodicalId":72220,"journal":{"name":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14701/ahbps.24-078","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Backgrounds/aims: A postoperative biliary leak is one of the most morbid complications occurring after a liver resection, the long-term impact of which remains unknown.

Methods: Retrospective analysis of consecutive liver resections performed from 1 January 2011 to 31 December 2021. Primary endpoint of disease-free survival (DFS) was compared between patients with and without a bile leak, stratifying for tumor type. Survival curves were plotted using Kaplan-Meier estimates, and differences between them were analyzed using the log-rank test.

Results: In toto, 862 patients were analyzed, and included 306 (35.5%) hepatocellular carcinomas, 212 (24.6%) metastatic colorectal cancers, and 111 (12.9%) cholangiocarcinomas (69 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas, 42 hilar cholangiocarcinomas). Occurrence of a bile leak was associated with significantly poorer DFS only in patients with cholangiocarcinoma (median DFS 9.9 months vs. 24.9 months, p = 0.013), and further analysis was restricted to this cohort. A Cox regression performed for factors associated with DFS detriment in patients with cholangiocarcinoma showed that apart from node positivity (hazard ratio [HR]: 2.482, p = 0.033) and margin positivity (HR: 2.65, p = 0.021), development of a bile leak was independently associated with worsening DFS on both univariate and multiple regression analyses (HR: 1.896, p = 0.033).

Conclusions: Post-hepatectomy biliary leaks are associated with significantly poorer DFS only in patients with cholangiocarcinoma, but not in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma or metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods to mitigate this survival detriment need to be explored.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同肝脏肿瘤肝切除术后胆漏对长期生存的影响:一家研究所的经验。
背景/目的:术后胆漏是肝切除术后最常见的并发症之一,其长期影响尚不清楚:方法:对2011年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间进行的连续肝脏切除术进行回顾性分析。比较有胆漏和无胆漏患者的无病生存期(DFS),并根据肿瘤类型进行分层。采用卡普兰-梅耶估计法绘制生存曲线,并采用对数秩检验分析两者之间的差异:共分析了 862 例患者,其中包括 306 例(35.5%)肝细胞癌、212 例(24.6%)转移性结直肠癌和 111 例(12.9%)胆管癌(69 例肝内胆管癌、42 例肝门部胆管癌)。只有胆管癌患者发生胆漏与较差的 DFS 显著相关(中位 DFS 9.9 个月 vs. 24.9 个月,p = 0.013),进一步分析仅限于该队列。对胆管癌患者的DFS不利相关因素进行的Cox回归显示,除了结节阳性(危险比[HR]:2.482,p = 0.033)和边缘阳性(HR:2.65,p = 0.021)外,胆漏的发生与单变量和多元回归分析中的DFS恶化独立相关(HR:1.896,p = 0.033):结论:肝切除术后胆漏仅与胆管癌患者的 DFS 明显降低有关,而与肝细胞癌或转移性结直肠癌患者无关。减轻这种生存损害的方法有待探索。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Three-dimensional printing of intra-abdominal cavity to prevent large-for-size syndrome in liver transplantation: Correspondence. A rare case of a large solid pseudopapillary neoplasm with extensive liver metastasis. Improved graft survival by using three-dimensional printing of intra-abdominal cavity to prevent large-for-size syndrome in liver transplantation. ArtiSential® laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus single-fulcrum laparoscopic cholecystectomy: Which minimally invasive surgery is better? Minimally invasive pancreatoduodenectomy with combined venous vascular resection: A comparative analysis with open approach.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1