Perceived Disruption of COVID-19 on Medical Education in Incoming Psychiatric Residents.

HCA healthcare journal of medicine Pub Date : 2024-06-01 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.36518/2689-0216.1567
Steven Sprenger, Ashley Mahajan, Jeffrey Anderson, Napatkamon Ayutyanont, Jessica C Wells, Gregory Guldner
{"title":"Perceived Disruption of COVID-19 on Medical Education in Incoming Psychiatric Residents.","authors":"Steven Sprenger, Ashley Mahajan, Jeffrey Anderson, Napatkamon Ayutyanont, Jessica C Wells, Gregory Guldner","doi":"10.36518/2689-0216.1567","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In 2020, the global COVID-19 pandemic caused educational disruptions to many medical students nationally. Societal and hospital guidelines, including social distancing protocols, resulted in the cancellation or postponement of many elective procedures. A shortage in personal protective equipment also contributed to restrictions in clinical experiences for trainees. The purpose of this study was to determine resident-perceived preparedness in core clinical competencies and evaluate the disruptions to core clerkships.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A survey was developed to assess self-perceptions of clinical competencies and disruptions to core clerkship experiences. It was distributed to 63 incoming psychiatric residents who matched to training programs in the United States.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The survey response rate was 97%. The majority of respondents achieved self-expected levels of proficiency in clinical skills. Deficits were greatest for pelvic/rectal exams and transitions of care. Most students did not experience disruptions to clerkships. Internal medicine, obstetrics, and gynecology clerkships reported the highest rates of virtual completion. Procedures with the lowest reported perceived preparation were arterial puncture, airway management, and IV placement, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Our survey results indicated that most learners did not perceive disruptions to their medical education and incoming psychiatry residents felt well-prepared to start residency. Some specific procedural skills appear to have been affected. Attempts to mitigate these specific inadequacies may help mitigate disruptions due to future events.</p>","PeriodicalId":73198,"journal":{"name":"HCA healthcare journal of medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249192/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HCA healthcare journal of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36518/2689-0216.1567","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In 2020, the global COVID-19 pandemic caused educational disruptions to many medical students nationally. Societal and hospital guidelines, including social distancing protocols, resulted in the cancellation or postponement of many elective procedures. A shortage in personal protective equipment also contributed to restrictions in clinical experiences for trainees. The purpose of this study was to determine resident-perceived preparedness in core clinical competencies and evaluate the disruptions to core clerkships.

Methods: A survey was developed to assess self-perceptions of clinical competencies and disruptions to core clerkship experiences. It was distributed to 63 incoming psychiatric residents who matched to training programs in the United States.

Results: The survey response rate was 97%. The majority of respondents achieved self-expected levels of proficiency in clinical skills. Deficits were greatest for pelvic/rectal exams and transitions of care. Most students did not experience disruptions to clerkships. Internal medicine, obstetrics, and gynecology clerkships reported the highest rates of virtual completion. Procedures with the lowest reported perceived preparation were arterial puncture, airway management, and IV placement, respectively.

Conclusion: Our survey results indicated that most learners did not perceive disruptions to their medical education and incoming psychiatry residents felt well-prepared to start residency. Some specific procedural skills appear to have been affected. Attempts to mitigate these specific inadequacies may help mitigate disruptions due to future events.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COVID-19对即将入院的精神科住院医师医学教育的干扰感。
背景:2020 年,全球 COVID-19 大流行导致全国许多医科学生的教育中断。社会和医院的指导方针,包括社会隔离协议,导致许多选择性手术被取消或推迟。个人防护设备的短缺也导致受训者的临床经验受到限制。本研究的目的是确定住院医师对核心临床能力的准备情况,并评估核心实习受到的干扰:方法:我们编制了一份调查问卷,以评估住院医师对临床能力的自我认知以及对核心实习经历的干扰。结果:调查问卷的回复率为 97%:调查回复率为 97%。大多数受访者都达到了临床技能熟练程度的自我预期水平。盆腔/直肠检查和护理过渡方面的缺陷最大。大多数学生的实习没有受到影响。内科、产科和妇科实习报告的虚拟完成率最高。所报告的准备程度最低的程序分别是动脉穿刺、气道管理和静脉置管:我们的调查结果表明,大多数学员认为他们的医学教育没有受到干扰,新入职的精神病学住院医师认为他们在开始住院医师培训前已经做好了充分准备。一些特定的程序技能似乎受到了影响。努力减轻这些特定的不足之处可能有助于减轻未来事件造成的干扰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
A Clinical Review on Spinal Epidural Abscess: Epidemiology, Pathophysiology, Diagnosis, and Management for Emergency Medicine and Hospitalist Physicians. A Pilot Physician Mentoring Program in a Large Hospital System. A Post-Suicide Survey: The Perspective We Have Been Missing. A Survey of Post-Graduate Satisfaction With Orthopaedic Residency Training at a Single Institution. An Acknowledgement to the HCA Healthcare Journal of Medicine's Reviewers and Editors for the First Half of 2024.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1