Building an antimicrobial stewardship model for a public-sector hospital: a pre-implementation study.

Jowhara Cassim, Sabiha Yusuf Essack, Sarentha Chetty
{"title":"Building an antimicrobial stewardship model for a public-sector hospital: a pre-implementation study.","authors":"Jowhara Cassim, Sabiha Yusuf Essack, Sarentha Chetty","doi":"10.1099/jmm.0.001853","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Introduction.</b> Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is recognized as an important global health risk, associated with increased mortality, morbidity and healthcare costs. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) involves a coherent set of processes that promote the rational use of antimicrobials.<b>Gap statement.</b> An AMS programme should be adapted and developed according to the available resources of a facility. This requires an analysis of the core AMS elements that are already in place and the resources available.<b>Aim.</b> This study aimed to assess the readiness of a tertiary healthcare facility and staff towards implementing an antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP).<b>Methodology.</b> This study focused on two aspects during an AMS pre-implementation phase. A situational or strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis was conducted based on (1) a questionnaire on attitudes and perceptions of pharmacists, clinicians and nurses towards AMR and AMS and (2) a situational analysis on the readiness of the facility.<b>Results.</b> The questionnaire, which was available for completion between September 2021 and December 2021, was sent to a total of 3100 healthcare professionals (HCPs). Thirty-two (1.0 %) HCPs comprising 2 pharmacists, 16 clinicians and 14 nurses completed the questionnaire. Of the total participants, 31 (96.9 %) viewed AMR as a problem in South African hospitals and 29 (90.6 %) perceived AMR as a problem at their facility. The majority (<i>n</i> = 29, 90.6 %) of the participants were familiar with the term AMS, and 26 (81.3 %) participants agreed to willingly participate in any initiatives involving antimicrobial use at the facility. The situational analysis depicted existing strengths in terms of AMS structures such as the formation of an AMS committee and information and technology systems at the HCP's disposal. Weaknesses included the limited number of AMS activities being carried out and poor participation from HCPs within the AMS team.<b>Conclusion.</b> A pre-implementation phase in the building of an ASP can greatly assist in finding gaps for improvement, which can then be addressed in the implementation phase. Furthermore, the pre-implementation phase provides a baseline to measure improvements once the implementation phase has been instituted.</p>","PeriodicalId":94093,"journal":{"name":"Journal of medical microbiology","volume":"73 7","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of medical microbiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1099/jmm.0.001853","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is recognized as an important global health risk, associated with increased mortality, morbidity and healthcare costs. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) involves a coherent set of processes that promote the rational use of antimicrobials.Gap statement. An AMS programme should be adapted and developed according to the available resources of a facility. This requires an analysis of the core AMS elements that are already in place and the resources available.Aim. This study aimed to assess the readiness of a tertiary healthcare facility and staff towards implementing an antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP).Methodology. This study focused on two aspects during an AMS pre-implementation phase. A situational or strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and threats analysis was conducted based on (1) a questionnaire on attitudes and perceptions of pharmacists, clinicians and nurses towards AMR and AMS and (2) a situational analysis on the readiness of the facility.Results. The questionnaire, which was available for completion between September 2021 and December 2021, was sent to a total of 3100 healthcare professionals (HCPs). Thirty-two (1.0 %) HCPs comprising 2 pharmacists, 16 clinicians and 14 nurses completed the questionnaire. Of the total participants, 31 (96.9 %) viewed AMR as a problem in South African hospitals and 29 (90.6 %) perceived AMR as a problem at their facility. The majority (n = 29, 90.6 %) of the participants were familiar with the term AMS, and 26 (81.3 %) participants agreed to willingly participate in any initiatives involving antimicrobial use at the facility. The situational analysis depicted existing strengths in terms of AMS structures such as the formation of an AMS committee and information and technology systems at the HCP's disposal. Weaknesses included the limited number of AMS activities being carried out and poor participation from HCPs within the AMS team.Conclusion. A pre-implementation phase in the building of an ASP can greatly assist in finding gaps for improvement, which can then be addressed in the implementation phase. Furthermore, the pre-implementation phase provides a baseline to measure improvements once the implementation phase has been instituted.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
为一家公立医院建立抗菌药物管理模式:实施前研究。
导言。抗菌药耐药性(AMR)被认为是一个重要的全球健康风险,与死亡率、发病率和医疗成本的增加有关。抗菌药物管理(AMS)涉及一整套促进合理使用抗菌药物的流程。抗菌药物管理计划应根据医疗机构的可用资源进行调整和制定。这就需要对已有的 AMS 核心要素和可用资源进行分析。本研究旨在评估一家三级医疗机构和员工实施抗菌药物管理计划(ASP)的准备情况。本研究侧重于抗菌药物管理计划实施前阶段的两个方面。根据(1)药剂师、临床医生和护士对 AMR 和 AMS 的态度和看法的调查问卷,以及(2)对医疗机构准备情况的情景分析,进行了情景分析或优势、劣势、机会和威胁分析。调查问卷可在 2021 年 9 月至 2021 年 12 月期间填写,共发送给 3100 名医疗保健专业人员(HCPs)。32名医护人员(1.0%)填写了问卷,其中包括2名药剂师、16名临床医生和14名护士。在所有参与者中,31 人(96.9%)认为 AMR 是南非医院的一个问题,29 人(90.6%)认为 AMR 是其所在医院的一个问题。大多数参与者(n = 29,90.6%)熟悉 AMS 一词,26 名参与者(81.3%)同意自愿参与任何涉及本机构抗菌药物使用的倡议。情况分析表明,抗菌药物管理制度的现有优势包括抗菌药物管理委员会的成立以及供卫生保健人员使用的信息和技术系统。不足之处包括:正在开展的 AMS 活动数量有限,AMS 团队中的保健医生参与度不高。在建立联系学校项目的实施前阶段,可以极大地帮助找到需要改进的地方,然后在实施阶段加以解决。此外,实施前阶段还提供了一个基线,以便在实施阶段开始后衡量改进情况。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Antifungal resistance, clinical outcome and clinico-microbiological correlation in ocular infections due to common melanized fungi Curvularia lunata and Lasiodiplodia theobromae in South India. Genotypic analysis of Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli clonal complex 17 in England and Wales, 2014-2022. Nanomotion technology: an innovative method to study cell metabolism in Escherichia coli, as a potential indicator for tolerance. Association of gut microbiota with allograft injury in kidney transplant recipients: a comparative profiling through 16S metagenomics and quantitative PCR. Chronic Strongyloides stercoralis infection in Fijian migrants to the UK.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1