Use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications among Older Adults with Dementia or Cognitive Impairment Attending Memory Clinics: A Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Biomedicine hub Pub Date : 2024-05-22 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.1159/000539074
Rishabh Sharma, Jasdeep Kaur Gill, Caitlin Carter, Wajd Alkabbani, Manik Chhabra, Kota Vidyasagar, Feng Chang, Linda Lee, Tejal Patel
{"title":"Use of Potentially Inappropriate Medications among Older Adults with Dementia or Cognitive Impairment Attending Memory Clinics: A Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Rishabh Sharma, Jasdeep Kaur Gill, Caitlin Carter, Wajd Alkabbani, Manik Chhabra, Kota Vidyasagar, Feng Chang, Linda Lee, Tejal Patel","doi":"10.1159/000539074","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Older adults with dementia who are on multiple medications are more vulnerable to the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), which can significantly increase the risk of adverse events and drug-related problems. PIMs use is prevalent and varies among older adults with dementia or cognitive impairment (CI) attending memory clinics. However, the prevalence of PIMs, polypharmacy, and hyper-polypharmacy among older adults with dementia or CI who are attending memory clinics is not well understood. We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analyses to examine the overall estimate of the prevalence of the PIMs, polypharmacy, and hyper-polypharmacy use among older adults attending memory clinics, with dementia or CI. The secondary objective of this study will be to compile a list of commonly implicated PIMs and to investigate factors that may be associated with using PIMs in this population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Cochrane library, EBSCOhost CINAHL, and Ovid International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA) will be systematically searched by a researcher (R.S.) with the help of a librarian (C.C.). All databases will be searched from inception to May 05, 2023. Cross-sectional, cohort, randomized clinical trials, quasi-experimental, and case-control studies will be included if they assess PIM's use among older adults with dementia and/or CI. A step-by-step guide by Pai et al. [Natl Med J India. 2004;17(2):86-95] will be followed when conducting this systematic review (S.R.). The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist will be followed for reporting this SR.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The findings from this SR/MA will identify the pooled prevalence of PIMs, providing a more precise estimate of the true prevalence of the PIMs, polypharmacy, hyper-polypharmacy in older adults with dementia or CI who are attending memory clinics at primary, secondary, or tertiary healthcare settings by considering the results of multiple studies.</p>","PeriodicalId":101351,"journal":{"name":"Biomedicine hub","volume":"9 1","pages":"83-88"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249799/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedicine hub","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1159/000539074","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Older adults with dementia who are on multiple medications are more vulnerable to the use of potentially inappropriate medications (PIMs), which can significantly increase the risk of adverse events and drug-related problems. PIMs use is prevalent and varies among older adults with dementia or cognitive impairment (CI) attending memory clinics. However, the prevalence of PIMs, polypharmacy, and hyper-polypharmacy among older adults with dementia or CI who are attending memory clinics is not well understood. We will conduct a systematic review and meta-analyses to examine the overall estimate of the prevalence of the PIMs, polypharmacy, and hyper-polypharmacy use among older adults attending memory clinics, with dementia or CI. The secondary objective of this study will be to compile a list of commonly implicated PIMs and to investigate factors that may be associated with using PIMs in this population.

Methods: Ovid MEDLINE, Ovid Embase, Scopus, Cochrane library, EBSCOhost CINAHL, and Ovid International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA) will be systematically searched by a researcher (R.S.) with the help of a librarian (C.C.). All databases will be searched from inception to May 05, 2023. Cross-sectional, cohort, randomized clinical trials, quasi-experimental, and case-control studies will be included if they assess PIM's use among older adults with dementia and/or CI. A step-by-step guide by Pai et al. [Natl Med J India. 2004;17(2):86-95] will be followed when conducting this systematic review (S.R.). The PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) checklist will be followed for reporting this SR.

Conclusion: The findings from this SR/MA will identify the pooled prevalence of PIMs, providing a more precise estimate of the true prevalence of the PIMs, polypharmacy, hyper-polypharmacy in older adults with dementia or CI who are attending memory clinics at primary, secondary, or tertiary healthcare settings by considering the results of multiple studies.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在记忆门诊就诊的痴呆症或认知障碍老年人中使用潜在不当药物的情况:系统回顾与元分析协议》。
简介:服用多种药物的老年痴呆症患者更容易使用潜在的不适当药物(PIMs),这会大大增加不良事件和药物相关问题的风险。在前往记忆门诊就诊的患有痴呆症或认知障碍(CI)的老年人中,PIMs 的使用非常普遍,而且情况各不相同。然而,在记忆门诊就诊的痴呆症或认知障碍老年人中,PIMs、多药联用和超多药联用的发生率并不十分清楚。我们将开展一项系统性综述和荟萃分析,研究记忆门诊就诊的老年痴呆症或 CI 患者中 PIMs、多药联用和过度多药联用发生率的总体估计值。本研究的次要目标是编制一份常见PIMs清单,并调查可能与该人群使用PIMs有关的因素:研究人员(R.S.)将在图书管理员(C.C.)的帮助下系统地检索 Ovid MEDLINE、Ovid Embase、Scopus、Cochrane 图书馆、EBSCOhost CINAHL 和 Ovid International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA)。所有数据库的检索时间从开始到 2023 年 5 月 5 日。如果横断面研究、队列研究、随机临床试验、准实验研究和病例对照研究对患有痴呆症和/或 CI 的老年人使用 PIM 的情况进行了评估,则将纳入这些研究。在进行本系统综述时,将遵循 Pai 等人的逐步指南[Natl Med J India.在报告本系统综述时,将遵循 PRISMA(系统综述和元分析首选报告项目)清单:本 SR/MA 的研究结果将确定 PIMs 的总体流行率,通过考虑多项研究的结果,更精确地估计在初级、二级或三级医疗机构记忆门诊就诊的老年痴呆症或 CI 患者中 PIMs、多重药物治疗、多重药物治疗过度的真实流行率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Biodistribution of Polymeric Nanoparticles following in utero Delivery to a Nonhuman Primate. Meconium Influences Pulmonary Short-Chain Fatty Acid Concentration in Porcine Meconium Aspiration Model. Fetal-to-Neonatal Transition of an Infant with Transposition of the Great Arteries and Intact Ventricular Septum: A Case Report. Mycobacterium fortuitum Peritoneal Dialysis-Related Peritonitis in a Child: A Case Report. Outcome Prediction Model for Radiofrequency Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty with Tonsillectomy in Adult Obstructive Sleep Apnea: Retrospective Cohort Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1