The Subjective Visual Vertical and Electrocochleography Tests in Individuals with Meniere's Disease.

Hadi Behzad, Reza Gharibi, Mahmood Rezvaniamin, Setareh Kafashan, Ali Kamrani
{"title":"The Subjective Visual Vertical and Electrocochleography Tests in Individuals with Meniere's Disease.","authors":"Hadi Behzad, Reza Gharibi, Mahmood Rezvaniamin, Setareh Kafashan, Ali Kamrani","doi":"10.22038/IJORL.2024.77606.3604","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Meniere's disease is an inner ear disorder not associated with central brain structure involvement. Although the ECochG test has been commonly used to diagnose Meniere's disease recently, it has not demonstrated high sensitivity. Therefore, it is recommended that other complementary tests alongside the ECochG test be used to diagnose Meniere's disease. The SVV test has gained popularity recently for this reason, and in this study, it was decided to use the SVV test in both static and dynamic modes, along with the ECochG test, as a tool for diagnosing Meniere's disease and evaluating its diagnostic features.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>The study was conducted on 53 patients with confirmed unilateral Meniere's disease and a normal group. Means were calculated with a 95% confidence interval for the groups, and the corresponding graphs were plotted. Independent t-tests were used to examine the difference in SVV results between the normal and Meniere's groups. The ROC curve was then used to determine the cutoff point and calculate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>After investigating the cutoff point for the three SVV conditions (tilted towards the lesion), a cutoff point of 2.1 degrees with a sensitivity and specificity of approximately 0.7 was identified as the best condition for distinguishing the Meniere's group from the healthy group.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Finally, based on the findings, it can be concluded that the SVV test has relatively low sensitivity for diagnosing Meniere's disease. Therefore, more than relying solely on its results to identify Meniere's disease is required, and it is suggested that other measures alongside the ECochG and SVV tests be included in future studies for further investigation.</p>","PeriodicalId":14607,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","volume":"36 4","pages":"517-525"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247444/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/IJORL.2024.77606.3604","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Meniere's disease is an inner ear disorder not associated with central brain structure involvement. Although the ECochG test has been commonly used to diagnose Meniere's disease recently, it has not demonstrated high sensitivity. Therefore, it is recommended that other complementary tests alongside the ECochG test be used to diagnose Meniere's disease. The SVV test has gained popularity recently for this reason, and in this study, it was decided to use the SVV test in both static and dynamic modes, along with the ECochG test, as a tool for diagnosing Meniere's disease and evaluating its diagnostic features.

Materials and methods: The study was conducted on 53 patients with confirmed unilateral Meniere's disease and a normal group. Means were calculated with a 95% confidence interval for the groups, and the corresponding graphs were plotted. Independent t-tests were used to examine the difference in SVV results between the normal and Meniere's groups. The ROC curve was then used to determine the cutoff point and calculate.

Results: After investigating the cutoff point for the three SVV conditions (tilted towards the lesion), a cutoff point of 2.1 degrees with a sensitivity and specificity of approximately 0.7 was identified as the best condition for distinguishing the Meniere's group from the healthy group.

Conclusion: Finally, based on the findings, it can be concluded that the SVV test has relatively low sensitivity for diagnosing Meniere's disease. Therefore, more than relying solely on its results to identify Meniere's disease is required, and it is suggested that other measures alongside the ECochG and SVV tests be included in future studies for further investigation.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
美尼尔氏病患者的主观视觉垂直度和耳电图测试
简介美尼尔氏病是一种与大脑中枢结构受累无关的内耳疾病。虽然最近常用心电图测试诊断美尼尔氏病,但其灵敏度并不高。因此,建议在使用 ECochG 测试诊断美尼尔氏病的同时使用其他辅助测试。在本研究中,我们决定将静态和动态 SVV 测试与心电图测试一起作为诊断梅尼埃病的工具,并评估其诊断特征:研究对象为 53 名确诊为单侧美尼尔氏病患者和一组正常人。计算了各组的平均值和 95% 的置信区间,并绘制了相应的图表。采用独立 t 检验来检验正常组和梅尼埃病组 SVV 结果的差异。然后使用 ROC 曲线确定临界点并进行计算:在研究了三种 SVV 条件(向病灶倾斜)的临界点后,确定 2.1 度的临界点是区分美尼尔氏症组和健康组的最佳条件,灵敏度和特异度约为 0.7:最后,根据研究结果可以得出结论,SVV 测试诊断美尼尔氏病的灵敏度相对较低。因此,不能仅仅依靠 SVV 测试结果来鉴别美尼尔氏病,建议在今后的研究中,除 ECochG 和 SVV 测试外,还应纳入其他测量方法,以便进一步研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology
Iranian Journal of Otorhinolaryngology Medicine-Otorhinolaryngology
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
72
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Performance of Wrist-Worn Pulse Oximeter for the Screening of Obstructive Sleep Apnea. Submandibular Gland Preservation in Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinomas: Our Analysis at A Tertiary Care Hospital. Transnasal Endoscopic Injection of Botulinum Toxin in Patients with Adductor Spasmodic Dysphonia. Evaluation of Dentofacial Angles in Children with Severe Adenoid Hypertrophy. Junctional Epidermolysis Bullosa Associated Laryngeal Stenosis: A Case Report and Review of Literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1