Patrick T. Lynch MD , Alexandra Maloof MD , Anish Badjatiya MD , Payam Safavi-Naeini MD, MPH , Matthew W. Segar MD , Jitae A. Kim MD , Qussay Marashly MD , Joanna E. Molina-Razavi MD , Leo Simpson MD , Selby B. Oberton MD , Lola X. Xie MD , Andrew Civitello MD , Nilesh Mathuria MD , Jie Cheng MD, PhD , Abdi Rasekh MD , Mohammad Saeed MD , Mehdi Razavi MD , Ajith Nair MD , Mihail G. Chelu MD, PhD
{"title":"Mortality in Recipients of Durable Left Ventricular Assist Devices Undergoing Ventricular Tachycardia Ablation","authors":"Patrick T. Lynch MD , Alexandra Maloof MD , Anish Badjatiya MD , Payam Safavi-Naeini MD, MPH , Matthew W. Segar MD , Jitae A. Kim MD , Qussay Marashly MD , Joanna E. Molina-Razavi MD , Leo Simpson MD , Selby B. Oberton MD , Lola X. Xie MD , Andrew Civitello MD , Nilesh Mathuria MD , Jie Cheng MD, PhD , Abdi Rasekh MD , Mohammad Saeed MD , Mehdi Razavi MD , Ajith Nair MD , Mihail G. Chelu MD, PhD","doi":"10.1016/j.jacep.2024.04.037","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>Left ventricular assist device<span> (LVAD) recipients have a higher incidence of ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, the role of VT ablation in this population is not well-established.</span></div></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><div>This single-center retrospective cohort study sought to examine the impact of post-LVAD implant VT ablation on survival.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>This retrospective study examined a cohort of patients that underwent LVAD implantation at Baylor St. Luke’s Medical Center and Texas Heart Institute between January 2011 and January 2021. All-cause estimated mortality was compared across LVAD recipients based on the incidence of VT, timing of VT onset, and the occurrence and timing of VT ablation utilizing Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div><span>Post-implant VT occurred in 53% of 575 LVAD recipients. Higher mortality was seen among patients with post-implant VT within a year of implantation (HR: 1.62 [95% CI: 1.15-2.27]). Among this cohort, patients who were treated with a catheter ablation had superior survival compared with patients treated with medical therapy alone for the 45 months following VT onset (HR: 0.48 [95% CI: 0.26-0.89]). Moreover, performance of an ablation in this population aligned </span>mortality rates with those who did not experience post-implant VT (HR: 1.18 [95% CI: 0.71-1.98]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>VT occurrence within 1 year of LVAD implantation was associated with worse survival. However, performance of VT ablation in this population was correlated with improved survival compared with medical management alone. Among patients with refractory VT, catheter ablation aligned survival with other LVAD participants without post-implant VT. Catheter ablation of VT is associated with improved survival in LVAD recipients, but further prospective randomized studies are needed to compare VT ablation to medical management in LVAD recipients.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":14573,"journal":{"name":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":8.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JACC. Clinical electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2405500X24004572","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background
Left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients have a higher incidence of ventricular tachycardia (VT). However, the role of VT ablation in this population is not well-established.
Objectives
This single-center retrospective cohort study sought to examine the impact of post-LVAD implant VT ablation on survival.
Methods
This retrospective study examined a cohort of patients that underwent LVAD implantation at Baylor St. Luke’s Medical Center and Texas Heart Institute between January 2011 and January 2021. All-cause estimated mortality was compared across LVAD recipients based on the incidence of VT, timing of VT onset, and the occurrence and timing of VT ablation utilizing Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox proportional hazards models.
Results
Post-implant VT occurred in 53% of 575 LVAD recipients. Higher mortality was seen among patients with post-implant VT within a year of implantation (HR: 1.62 [95% CI: 1.15-2.27]). Among this cohort, patients who were treated with a catheter ablation had superior survival compared with patients treated with medical therapy alone for the 45 months following VT onset (HR: 0.48 [95% CI: 0.26-0.89]). Moreover, performance of an ablation in this population aligned mortality rates with those who did not experience post-implant VT (HR: 1.18 [95% CI: 0.71-1.98]).
Conclusions
VT occurrence within 1 year of LVAD implantation was associated with worse survival. However, performance of VT ablation in this population was correlated with improved survival compared with medical management alone. Among patients with refractory VT, catheter ablation aligned survival with other LVAD participants without post-implant VT. Catheter ablation of VT is associated with improved survival in LVAD recipients, but further prospective randomized studies are needed to compare VT ablation to medical management in LVAD recipients.
期刊介绍:
JACC: Clinical Electrophysiology is one of a family of specialist journals launched by the renowned Journal of the American College of Cardiology (JACC). It encompasses all aspects of the epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and treatment of cardiac arrhythmias. Submissions of original research and state-of-the-art reviews from cardiology, cardiovascular surgery, neurology, outcomes research, and related fields are encouraged. Experimental and preclinical work that directly relates to diagnostic or therapeutic interventions are also encouraged. In general, case reports will not be considered for publication.