A Longitudinal Multivariable Analysis: State Policies and Opioid Dispensing in Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Surgery.

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES Journal of General Internal Medicine Pub Date : 2024-11-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1007/s11606-024-08888-3
Kelsey C Priest, Jessica S Merlin, Julie Lai, Mark Sorbero, Erin A Taylor, Andrew W Dick, Bradley D Stein
{"title":"A Longitudinal Multivariable Analysis: State Policies and Opioid Dispensing in Medicare Beneficiaries Undergoing Surgery.","authors":"Kelsey C Priest, Jessica S Merlin, Julie Lai, Mark Sorbero, Erin A Taylor, Andrew W Dick, Bradley D Stein","doi":"10.1007/s11606-024-08888-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>States have implemented policies to decrease clinically unnecessary opioid prescribing, but few studies have examined how state policies affect opioid dispensing rate trends for surgical patients.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine trends in the perioperative opioid dispensing rates for fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries and the effects of select state policies.</p><p><strong>Design and participants: </strong>A retrospective cohort study using 2006 to 2018 Medicare claims data for individuals undergoing surgical procedures for which opioid analgesic treatment is common.</p><p><strong>Exposures: </strong>State policies mandating prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP; PDMP policies) use, initial opioid prescription duration limit (duration limit policies), and mandated continuing medical education (CME; CME pain policies) on pain management.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Opioid dispensing rates, days' supply, and the daily morphine milligram equivalent dose (MMED).</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>The percentage of Medicare beneficiaries dispensed opioids in the perioperative period increased from 2007 to 2018; MMED and days' supply decreased over the same period, with significant variation by age, sex, and race. None of the three state policies affected the likelihood of Medicare beneficiaries being dispensed perioperative opioids. However, CME pain policies and duration limit policies were associated with decreased days' supply and decreased MMED in the several years following implementation, respectively.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>While we observed a slight increase in the rate of Medicare beneficiaries dispensed opioids perioperatively and a substantial decrease in MMED and days' supply for those receiving opioids, state policies examined had relatively modest effects on the main measures. Our findings suggest that these state policies may have a limited impact on opioid dispensing for a patient population that is commonly dispensed opioid analgesics to help control surgical pain, and as a result may have little direct effect on clinical outcomes for this population. Changes in opioid dispensing for this population may be the result of broader societal trends than such state policies.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":"2942-2951"},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11576702/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-024-08888-3","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/17 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: States have implemented policies to decrease clinically unnecessary opioid prescribing, but few studies have examined how state policies affect opioid dispensing rate trends for surgical patients.

Objective: To examine trends in the perioperative opioid dispensing rates for fee-for-service Medicare beneficiaries and the effects of select state policies.

Design and participants: A retrospective cohort study using 2006 to 2018 Medicare claims data for individuals undergoing surgical procedures for which opioid analgesic treatment is common.

Exposures: State policies mandating prescription drug monitoring program (PDMP; PDMP policies) use, initial opioid prescription duration limit (duration limit policies), and mandated continuing medical education (CME; CME pain policies) on pain management.

Main measures: Opioid dispensing rates, days' supply, and the daily morphine milligram equivalent dose (MMED).

Key results: The percentage of Medicare beneficiaries dispensed opioids in the perioperative period increased from 2007 to 2018; MMED and days' supply decreased over the same period, with significant variation by age, sex, and race. None of the three state policies affected the likelihood of Medicare beneficiaries being dispensed perioperative opioids. However, CME pain policies and duration limit policies were associated with decreased days' supply and decreased MMED in the several years following implementation, respectively.

Conclusion: While we observed a slight increase in the rate of Medicare beneficiaries dispensed opioids perioperatively and a substantial decrease in MMED and days' supply for those receiving opioids, state policies examined had relatively modest effects on the main measures. Our findings suggest that these state policies may have a limited impact on opioid dispensing for a patient population that is commonly dispensed opioid analgesics to help control surgical pain, and as a result may have little direct effect on clinical outcomes for this population. Changes in opioid dispensing for this population may be the result of broader societal trends than such state policies.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
纵向多变量分析:州政策与接受手术的医疗保险受益人的阿片类药物配给。
背景:美国各州都实施了减少临床不必要阿片类药物处方的政策,但很少有研究探讨各州政策如何影响手术患者的阿片类药物配药率趋势:各州已经实施了减少临床上不必要的阿片类药物处方的政策,但很少有研究探讨各州的政策如何影响手术患者的阿片类药物配药率趋势:目的:研究收费服务的医疗保险受益人围手术期阿片类药物配药率的趋势以及特定州政策的影响:一项回顾性队列研究,使用 2006 年至 2018 年的医疗保险报销数据,研究对象为接受手术治疗的患者,阿片类镇痛药治疗在这些手术中很常见:强制使用处方药监控计划(PDMP;PDMP 政策)的州政策、阿片类药物初始处方持续时间限制(持续时间限制政策),以及关于疼痛管理的强制继续医学教育(CME;CME 疼痛政策):主要衡量指标:阿片类药物配药率、供应天数和每日吗啡毫克当量剂量(MMED):从 2007 年到 2018 年,在围手术期配发阿片类药物的医疗保险受益人比例有所上升;同期,MMED 和供应天数有所下降,不同年龄、性别和种族的差异显著。三个州的政策均未影响医疗保险受益人在围手术期获得阿片类药物的可能性。然而,CME 疼痛政策和持续时间限制政策在实施后的几年内分别与供应天数减少和 MMED 减少有关:虽然我们观察到医疗保险受益人围手术期获得阿片类药物的比例略有增加,而接受阿片类药物治疗的患者的 MMED 和供应天数大幅减少,但所研究的州政策对主要衡量指标的影响相对较小。我们的研究结果表明,这些州政府政策对阿片类药物配药的影响可能有限,而这些患者通常都会获得阿片类镇痛药来帮助控制手术疼痛,因此,这些政策对这一人群的临床治疗效果可能没有什么直接影响。该人群阿片类药物配伍的变化可能是更广泛的社会趋势而非州政府政策的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
期刊最新文献
Discussing Weight with Patients in Primary Care in Australia: A Mixed Methods Experimental Study. Association of Observation Stays with Clinical Outcomes and Costs in Medicare: An Instrumental Variable Analysis. The Master Adaptive Clinician Educator: A Framework for Future Educational Leaders in Academic Medicine. Empagliflozin in Diuretic-Refractory Ascites (DRAin-Em): Results of a Single-Center Feasibility Study. Effectiveness of a Novel Global Telemedicine Curriculum for Medical Students.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1