21-Gene Recurrence Score and Survival Outcomes in the Phase III Multicenter TAILORx Clinical Trial.

IF 14.8 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.6004/jnccn.2024.7008
Sherry X Yang, John Yu, Molin Wang
{"title":"21-Gene Recurrence Score and Survival Outcomes in the Phase III Multicenter TAILORx Clinical Trial.","authors":"Sherry X Yang, John Yu, Molin Wang","doi":"10.6004/jnccn.2024.7008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Recurrence score (RS) based on a 21-gene genomic assay is frequently used to estimate risk of distant recurrence for choice of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. It remains unclear whether RS is an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) in the TAILORx trial population.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We evaluated the association of RS with BCSS and OS plus recurrence-free interval (RFI) and invasive disease-free survival (DFS) using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, adjusting for clinicopathologic measures, in 8,916 patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer. Likelihood ratio (LR) test was used to assess the relative amount of prognostic information provided by RS to BCSS, OS, RFI, and DFS, comparatively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Event rates for BCSS, OS, RFI, and DFS were 1.7%, 5.2%, 5.6%, and 12.6%, respectively, by up to 11.6 years of follow-up. Compared with low-range RS (0-10), patients with midrange (11-25) and high-range (26-100) RS had inferior BCSS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 5.12 [95% CI, 2.09-16.92] and 8.03 [95% CI, 2.91-28.47], respectively) and RFI (aHR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.23-2.36] and 3.05 [95% CI, 2.02-4.67], respectively), independent of clinicopathologic factors. High-range score was associated with an increased risk of DFS (aHR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.20-2.04]) but not significantly associated with OS (aHR, 1.44 [95% CI, 0.95-2.18]). Midrange score was associated with neither DFS (aHR, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.96-1.38]) nor OS (HR 1.14 [95% CI, 0.87-1.52]). LR-χ2 values were 83.0 and 65.1 for RFI and BCSS, respectively, and 17.5 and 33.6 for OS and DFS, respectively (P<.0001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>RS is an independent measure for BCSS and recurrence prognoses relative to OS in early-stage breast cancer. It carries more prognostic information for breast cancer-specific outcomes.</p>","PeriodicalId":17483,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","volume":" ","pages":"376-381"},"PeriodicalIF":14.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2024.7008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Recurrence score (RS) based on a 21-gene genomic assay is frequently used to estimate risk of distant recurrence for choice of adjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer. It remains unclear whether RS is an independent prognostic factor for breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) and overall survival (OS) in the TAILORx trial population.

Methods: We evaluated the association of RS with BCSS and OS plus recurrence-free interval (RFI) and invasive disease-free survival (DFS) using multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, adjusting for clinicopathologic measures, in 8,916 patients with hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative, node-negative breast cancer. Likelihood ratio (LR) test was used to assess the relative amount of prognostic information provided by RS to BCSS, OS, RFI, and DFS, comparatively.

Results: Event rates for BCSS, OS, RFI, and DFS were 1.7%, 5.2%, 5.6%, and 12.6%, respectively, by up to 11.6 years of follow-up. Compared with low-range RS (0-10), patients with midrange (11-25) and high-range (26-100) RS had inferior BCSS (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 5.12 [95% CI, 2.09-16.92] and 8.03 [95% CI, 2.91-28.47], respectively) and RFI (aHR, 1.68 [95% CI, 1.23-2.36] and 3.05 [95% CI, 2.02-4.67], respectively), independent of clinicopathologic factors. High-range score was associated with an increased risk of DFS (aHR, 1.56 [95% CI, 1.20-2.04]) but not significantly associated with OS (aHR, 1.44 [95% CI, 0.95-2.18]). Midrange score was associated with neither DFS (aHR, 1.15 [95% CI, 0.96-1.38]) nor OS (HR 1.14 [95% CI, 0.87-1.52]). LR-χ2 values were 83.0 and 65.1 for RFI and BCSS, respectively, and 17.5 and 33.6 for OS and DFS, respectively (P<.0001).

Conclusions: RS is an independent measure for BCSS and recurrence prognoses relative to OS in early-stage breast cancer. It carries more prognostic information for breast cancer-specific outcomes.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
21 基因复发评分与 TAILORx III 期多中心临床试验的生存结果。
背景:基于21个基因基因组检测的复发评分(RS)常用于估计乳腺癌远处复发的风险,以便选择辅助化疗。在 TAILORx 试验人群中,RS 是否是乳腺癌特异性生存(BCSS)和总生存(OS)的独立预后因素仍不清楚:方法:我们对 8916 名激素受体阳性、HER2 阴性、结节阴性乳腺癌患者进行了多变量 Cox 比例危险回归分析,评估了 RS 与 BCSS 和 OS 以及无复发间期(RFI)和无侵袭性疾病生存期(DFS)的关系,并对临床病理指标进行了调整。使用似然比(LR)检验来评估RS为BCSS、OS、RFI和DFS提供的相对预后信息量:在长达11.6年的随访中,BCSS、OS、RFI和DFS的事件发生率分别为1.7%、5.2%、5.6%和12.6%。与低范围RS(0-10分)相比,中范围(11-25分)和高范围(26-100分)RS患者的BCSS(调整后危险比[aHR]分别为5.12[95% CI, 2.09-16.92]和8.03[95% CI, 2.91-28.47])和RFI(aHR分别为1.68[95% CI, 1.23-2.36]和3.05[95% CI, 2.02-4.67])较差,与临床病理因素无关。高范围评分与 DFS 风险增加有关(aHR,1.56 [95% CI,1.20-2.04]),但与 OS 无关(aHR,1.44 [95% CI,0.95-2.18])。中档评分与 DFS(aHR,1.15 [95% CI,0.96-1.38])和 OS(HR 1.14 [95% CI,0.87-1.52])均无相关性。RFI和BCSS的LR-χ2值分别为83.0和65.1,OS和DFS的LR-χ2值分别为17.5和33.6(结论:RS是BCSS的独立测量指标:相对于OS,RS是衡量早期乳腺癌BCSS和复发预后的独立指标。它为乳腺癌特异性预后提供了更多信息。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
20.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
388
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: JNCCN—Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network is a peer-reviewed medical journal read by over 25,000 oncologists and cancer care professionals nationwide. This indexed publication delivers the latest insights into best clinical practices, oncology health services research, and translational medicine. Notably, JNCCN provides updates on the NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology® (NCCN Guidelines®), review articles elaborating on guideline recommendations, health services research, and case reports that spotlight molecular insights in patient care. Guided by its vision, JNCCN seeks to advance the mission of NCCN by serving as the primary resource for information on NCCN Guidelines®, innovation in translational medicine, and scientific studies related to oncology health services research. This encompasses quality care and value, bioethics, comparative and cost effectiveness, public policy, and interventional research on supportive care and survivorship. JNCCN boasts indexing by prominent databases such as MEDLINE/PubMed, Chemical Abstracts, Embase, EmCare, and Scopus, reinforcing its standing as a reputable source for comprehensive information in the field of oncology.
期刊最新文献
Proportion of Gleason Score ≥8 Prostate Cancer on Biopsy and Tumor Aggressiveness in Matched Cohorts of East Asian and Non-East Asian Men. Local Recurrence and Survival in Patients With Melanoma >2 mm in Thickness at Difficult Sites Treated With 1-cm Versus 2-cm Margins. Oncology Survivorship Care Clinics: Design and Implementation of Survivorship Care Delivery Systems at NCCN Member Institutions. Achieving Adherence With NCCN Guidelines for Nonmelanoma Skin Cancer Regarding Peripheral and Deep En Face Margin Assessment (PDEMA). Authors' Reply to the Letter to the Editor by Wu Re: Enhancing the Readability of Online Patient-Facing Content Using AI Chatbots.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1