Intrathecal dexamethasone as an adjuvant for spinal anesthesia: a systematic review.

IF 2.9 3区 医学 Q1 ANESTHESIOLOGY Minerva anestesiologica Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18054-6
Giuseppe Pascarella, Alessandro Ruggiero, Maria L Garo, Alessandro Strumia, Marta DI Folco, Mario V Papa, Omar Giacinto, Mario Lusini, Fabio Costa, Alessia Mattei, Lorenzo Schiavoni, Rita Cataldo, Massimo Chello, Felice E Agrò, Massimiliano Carassiti
{"title":"Intrathecal dexamethasone as an adjuvant for spinal anesthesia: a systematic review.","authors":"Giuseppe Pascarella, Alessandro Ruggiero, Maria L Garo, Alessandro Strumia, Marta DI Folco, Mario V Papa, Omar Giacinto, Mario Lusini, Fabio Costa, Alessia Mattei, Lorenzo Schiavoni, Rita Cataldo, Massimo Chello, Felice E Agrò, Massimiliano Carassiti","doi":"10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18054-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Spinal anesthesia is a common anesthetic technique for lower limb and abdominal surgery. Despite its efficacy, its use is limited because of its duration and potential severe side effects, especially in high-risk patients undergoing major surgery. Adjuvants such as dexamethasone offer the potential to prolong the anesthetic effect and reduce the need for local anesthetics while reducing the incidence of serious adverse events. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone as an intrathecal adjuvant in prolonging anesthetic duration, delaying pain onset, and minimizing adverse events (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022350218).</p><p><strong>Evidence acquisition: </strong>We included randomized controlled trials conducted in adult patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for lower limb or abdominal surgery and comparing the performance of dexamethasone with alternative spinal treatments. A comprehensive systematic search was conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Cochrane Library from February to June 2023 without language restriction. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2).</p><p><strong>Evidence synthesis: </strong>Ten studies, nine of which were at high risk of bias, were included (N.=685 patients). Overall, intrathecal dexamethasone was associated with a longer duration of sensory block, improvement in the duration or extent of postoperative analgesia, and significant shortening of block onset. The role of dexamethasone in prolonging motor block was not clear. The incidence of adverse events was low. Intrathecal dexamethasone has been shown to be a potentially valuable adjuvant to prolong the duration of sensory block and improve postoperative analgesia without increasing adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Given the wide heterogeneity of methodological approaches, further investigation is needed. Considering the limitations of the included studies and awaiting more conclusive evidence, the prudent use of dexamethasone could be recommended in those specific situations where general anesthesia or higher local anesthetics should be avoided.</p>","PeriodicalId":18522,"journal":{"name":"Minerva anestesiologica","volume":"90 7-8","pages":"662-671"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Minerva anestesiologica","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23736/S0375-9393.24.18054-6","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANESTHESIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Spinal anesthesia is a common anesthetic technique for lower limb and abdominal surgery. Despite its efficacy, its use is limited because of its duration and potential severe side effects, especially in high-risk patients undergoing major surgery. Adjuvants such as dexamethasone offer the potential to prolong the anesthetic effect and reduce the need for local anesthetics while reducing the incidence of serious adverse events. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of dexamethasone as an intrathecal adjuvant in prolonging anesthetic duration, delaying pain onset, and minimizing adverse events (PROSPERO registration: CRD42022350218).

Evidence acquisition: We included randomized controlled trials conducted in adult patients undergoing spinal anesthesia for lower limb or abdominal surgery and comparing the performance of dexamethasone with alternative spinal treatments. A comprehensive systematic search was conducted on PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, CENTRAL, and Cochrane Library from February to June 2023 without language restriction. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool (RoB2).

Evidence synthesis: Ten studies, nine of which were at high risk of bias, were included (N.=685 patients). Overall, intrathecal dexamethasone was associated with a longer duration of sensory block, improvement in the duration or extent of postoperative analgesia, and significant shortening of block onset. The role of dexamethasone in prolonging motor block was not clear. The incidence of adverse events was low. Intrathecal dexamethasone has been shown to be a potentially valuable adjuvant to prolong the duration of sensory block and improve postoperative analgesia without increasing adverse events.

Conclusions: Given the wide heterogeneity of methodological approaches, further investigation is needed. Considering the limitations of the included studies and awaiting more conclusive evidence, the prudent use of dexamethasone could be recommended in those specific situations where general anesthesia or higher local anesthetics should be avoided.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
鞘内地塞米松作为脊髓麻醉的辅助药物:系统综述。
简介脊髓麻醉是下肢和腹部手术常用的麻醉技术。尽管脊髓麻醉效果显著,但由于其持续时间和潜在的严重副作用,其使用受到了限制,尤其是在接受大手术的高危患者中。地塞米松等辅助药物有可能延长麻醉效果,减少对局麻药的需求,同时降低严重不良反应的发生率。本系统性综述旨在评估地塞米松作为鞘内辅助药物在延长麻醉时间、延迟疼痛发作和减少不良反应方面的疗效(PROSPERO 注册:CRD42022350218):我们纳入了针对因下肢或腹部手术而接受脊柱麻醉的成年患者进行的随机对照试验,并比较了地塞米松与其他脊柱治疗方法的效果。2023 年 2 月至 6 月期间,在 PubMed/MEDLINE、Scopus、CINAHL、EMBASE、CENTRAL 和 Cochrane Library 上进行了全面的系统检索,没有语言限制。使用科克伦偏倚风险工具(RoB2)评估偏倚风险:共纳入 10 项研究,其中 9 项存在高偏倚风险(N=685 名患者)。总体而言,鞘内地塞米松与延长感觉阻滞持续时间、改善术后镇痛持续时间或程度以及显著缩短阻滞起始时间有关。地塞米松在延长运动阻滞方面的作用尚不明确。不良反应发生率较低。鞘内地塞米松已被证明是一种有潜在价值的辅助药物,可延长感觉阻滞的持续时间并改善术后镇痛,同时不会增加不良反应:鉴于方法学方法的广泛异质性,还需要进一步研究。考虑到所纳入研究的局限性,在等待更多确凿证据的同时,可建议在应避免全身麻醉或使用高浓度局麻药的特定情况下谨慎使用地塞米松。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Minerva anestesiologica
Minerva anestesiologica 医学-麻醉学
CiteScore
4.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
367
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Minerva Anestesiologica is the journal of the Italian National Society of Anaesthesia, Analgesia, Resuscitation, and Intensive Care. Minerva Anestesiologica publishes scientific papers on Anesthesiology, Intensive care, Analgesia, Perioperative Medicine and related fields. Manuscripts are expected to comply with the instructions to authors which conform to the Uniform Requirements for Manuscripts Submitted to Biomedical Editors by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.
期刊最新文献
Assessment of the organ function as the primary intention of clinical reasoning applied to the critically ill patient. Analgesic efficacy of ultrasound-guided rhomboid intercostal block versus serratus plane block in modified radical mastectomy: a prospective randomized controlled study. Renal resistive index assessment by intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography is associated with acute kidney injury after cardiac surgery: a prospective observational study. Ultrasonography versus conventional palpation for epidural analgesia in pediatrics undergoing midabdominal urological operations: a randomized clinical trial. Comparison of remimazolam and propofol on postoperative subjective quality of recovery in patients undergoing general anesthesia: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1