Clinical implications of Wnt pathway genetic alterations in men with advanced prostate cancer.

IF 5.1 2区 医学 Q1 ONCOLOGY Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1038/s41391-024-00869-1
Amanda Broderick, Elizabeth Pan, Jinju Li, Alec Chu, Clara Hwang, Pedro C Barata, Frank Cameron Cackowski, Matthew Labriola, Alyssa Ghose, Mehmet Asim Bilen, Deepak Kilari, Bicky Thapa, Michael Piero, Laura Graham, Abhishek Tripathi, Rohan Garje, Vadim S Koshkin, Erik Hernandez, Tanya B Dorff, Michael Thomas Schweizer, Ajjai Shivaram Alva, Rana R McKay, Andrew J Armstrong
{"title":"Clinical implications of Wnt pathway genetic alterations in men with advanced prostate cancer.","authors":"Amanda Broderick, Elizabeth Pan, Jinju Li, Alec Chu, Clara Hwang, Pedro C Barata, Frank Cameron Cackowski, Matthew Labriola, Alyssa Ghose, Mehmet Asim Bilen, Deepak Kilari, Bicky Thapa, Michael Piero, Laura Graham, Abhishek Tripathi, Rohan Garje, Vadim S Koshkin, Erik Hernandez, Tanya B Dorff, Michael Thomas Schweizer, Ajjai Shivaram Alva, Rana R McKay, Andrew J Armstrong","doi":"10.1038/s41391-024-00869-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aberrant Wnt signaling has been implicated in prostate cancer tumorigenesis and metastasis in preclinical models but the impact of genetic alterations in Wnt signaling genes in men with advanced prostate cancer is unknown.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We utilized the Prostate Cancer Precision Medicine Multi-Institutional Collaborative Effort (PROMISE) clinical-genomic database for this retrospective analysis. Patients with activating mutations in CTNNB1 or RSPO2 or inactivating mutations in APC, RNF43, or ZNRF3 were defined as Wnt-altered, while those lacking such alterations were defined as Wnt non-altered. We compared patient characteristics and clinical outcomes as well as co-occurring genetic alterations according to Wnt alteration status.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Of the 1498 patients included, 193 (12.9%) were Wnt-altered. These men had a statistically significant 2-fold increased prevalence of liver and lung metastases as compared with Wnt non-altered patients at the time of initial diagnosis, (4.66% v 2.15% ; 6.22% v 3.07%), first metastatic disease diagnosis (10.88% v 5.29%; 13.99% v 6.21%), and CRPC development (11.40% v 6.36%; 12.95% v 5.29%). Wnt alterations were associated with more co-occurring alterations in RB1 (10.4% v 6.2%), AR (38.9% vs 25.7%), SPOP (13.5% vs 4.1%), FOXA1 (6.7% vs 2.8%), and PIK3CA (10.9% vs 5.1%). We found no significant differences in overall survival or other clinical outcomes from initial diagnosis, first metastatic disease, diagnosis of CRPC, or with AR inhibition for mCRPC between the Wnt groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Wnt-altered patients with prostate cancer have a higher prevalence of visceral metastases and are enriched in RB1, AR, SPOP, FOXA1, and PIK3CA alterations. Despite these associations, Wnt alterations were not associated with worse survival or treatment outcomes in men with advanced prostate cancer.</p>","PeriodicalId":20727,"journal":{"name":"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":5.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41391-024-00869-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Aberrant Wnt signaling has been implicated in prostate cancer tumorigenesis and metastasis in preclinical models but the impact of genetic alterations in Wnt signaling genes in men with advanced prostate cancer is unknown.

Methods: We utilized the Prostate Cancer Precision Medicine Multi-Institutional Collaborative Effort (PROMISE) clinical-genomic database for this retrospective analysis. Patients with activating mutations in CTNNB1 or RSPO2 or inactivating mutations in APC, RNF43, or ZNRF3 were defined as Wnt-altered, while those lacking such alterations were defined as Wnt non-altered. We compared patient characteristics and clinical outcomes as well as co-occurring genetic alterations according to Wnt alteration status.

Results: Of the 1498 patients included, 193 (12.9%) were Wnt-altered. These men had a statistically significant 2-fold increased prevalence of liver and lung metastases as compared with Wnt non-altered patients at the time of initial diagnosis, (4.66% v 2.15% ; 6.22% v 3.07%), first metastatic disease diagnosis (10.88% v 5.29%; 13.99% v 6.21%), and CRPC development (11.40% v 6.36%; 12.95% v 5.29%). Wnt alterations were associated with more co-occurring alterations in RB1 (10.4% v 6.2%), AR (38.9% vs 25.7%), SPOP (13.5% vs 4.1%), FOXA1 (6.7% vs 2.8%), and PIK3CA (10.9% vs 5.1%). We found no significant differences in overall survival or other clinical outcomes from initial diagnosis, first metastatic disease, diagnosis of CRPC, or with AR inhibition for mCRPC between the Wnt groups.

Conclusions: Wnt-altered patients with prostate cancer have a higher prevalence of visceral metastases and are enriched in RB1, AR, SPOP, FOXA1, and PIK3CA alterations. Despite these associations, Wnt alterations were not associated with worse survival or treatment outcomes in men with advanced prostate cancer.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
晚期前列腺癌男性 Wnt 通路基因改变的临床意义。
背景:在临床前模型中,Wnt 信号转导异常与前列腺癌的肿瘤发生和转移有关,但 Wnt 信号转导基因的遗传改变对晚期前列腺癌男性患者的影响尚不清楚:我们利用前列腺癌精准医学多机构协作努力(PROMISE)临床基因组数据库进行了这项回顾性分析。CTNNB1或RSPO2发生激活突变或APC、RNF43或ZNRF3发生灭活突变的患者被定义为Wnt改变患者,而没有发生此类改变的患者被定义为Wnt非改变患者。我们根据 Wnt 改变状态比较了患者特征、临床结果以及并发遗传改变:在纳入的 1498 名患者中,有 193 人(12.9%)发生了 Wnt 改变。与未发生 Wnt 改变的患者相比,这些男性患者在初次诊断(4.66% 对 2.15%;6.22% 对 3.07%)、首次转移性疾病诊断(10.88% 对 5.29%;13.99% 对 6.21%)和 CRPC 发展(11.40% 对 6.36%;12.95% 对 5.29%)时的肝脏和肺部转移发生率在统计学上显著增加了 2 倍。Wnt改变与更多的RB1(10.4% vs 6.2%)、AR(38.9% vs 25.7%)、SPOP(13.5% vs 4.1%)、FOXA1(6.7% vs 2.8%)和PIK3CA(10.9% vs 5.1%)共存改变相关。我们发现,从最初诊断、首次转移性疾病、诊断为CRPC或使用AR抑制剂治疗mCRPC开始,Wnt组之间的总生存期或其他临床结果没有明显差异:结论:Wnt改变的前列腺癌患者内脏转移率较高,且富含RB1、AR、SPOP、FOXA1和PIK3CA改变。尽管存在这些关联,但Wnt改变与晚期前列腺癌男性患者更差的生存期或治疗效果无关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases
Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases 医学-泌尿学与肾脏学
CiteScore
10.00
自引率
6.20%
发文量
142
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases covers all aspects of prostatic diseases, in particular prostate cancer, the subject of intensive basic and clinical research world-wide. The journal also reports on exciting new developments being made in diagnosis, surgery, radiotherapy, drug discovery and medical management. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases is of interest to surgeons, oncologists and clinicians treating patients and to those involved in research into diseases of the prostate. The journal covers the three main areas - prostate cancer, male LUTS and prostatitis. Prostate Cancer and Prostatic Diseases publishes original research articles, reviews, topical comment and critical appraisals of scientific meetings and the latest books. The journal also contains a calendar of forthcoming scientific meetings. The Editors and a distinguished Editorial Board ensure that submitted articles receive fast and efficient attention and are refereed to the highest possible scientific standard. A fast track system is available for topical articles of particular significance.
期刊最新文献
Comprehensive review of cardiovascular disease in prostate cancer: epidemiology, risk factors, therapeutics and prevention strategies. Overcoming barriers to prostate cancer genetic testing: who, when, and how. Follow-up on patients with initial negative mpMRI target and systematic biopsy for PI-RADS ≥ 3 lesions - an EAU-YAU study enhancing prostate cancer detection. Prostate cancer detection: achieving an optimal balance. Established focal therapy-HIFU, IRE, or cryotherapy-where are we now?-a systematic review and meta-analysis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1