Evaluation of Cross-Reactivity Between Penicillins and Cephalosporins in Children with a History of Cephalosporin Allergy.

IF 1 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital Pub Date : 2024-06-28 eCollection Date: 2024-01-01 DOI:10.14744/SEMB.2024.08286
Nursah Eker, Gunsel Kutluk, Feyzullah Cetinkaya
{"title":"Evaluation of Cross-Reactivity Between Penicillins and Cephalosporins in Children with a History of Cephalosporin Allergy.","authors":"Nursah Eker, Gunsel Kutluk, Feyzullah Cetinkaya","doi":"10.14744/SEMB.2024.08286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>The cross-reactivity problem between cephalosporins and penicillins has mainly been evaluated in the context of patients allergic to penicillins. However, we have little data regarding the opposite aspect of the problem, i.e. the cross-reactivity in subjects primarily sensitized to cephalosporins. This prospective study aims to evaluate the cross-reactivity to penicillins and some other cephalosporins in patients with immediate allergic reactions to cephalosporins.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The study included 21 children with immediate allergic reactions to at least one cephalosporin. Skin testing was performed with a panel of minor and major determinant mixtures of penicillins and three commonly used cephalosporins (cephazoline, cefuroxime and ceftriaxone).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The children had used 5.14±4.91 (1-15) times any beta-lactam antibiotic in the previous year and the most common cephalosporins accused were ceftriaxone (42.92%), and cefuroxime, cefazolin, cefixime, cefprozil and cefotaxime (9.5% each). Skin tests were positive for any cephalosporin in 14 (66.7%) subjects and penicillin allergens in 15 (71.4%) subjects. Totally, 85.7% of children with a positive allergy history to cephalosporins were found to be sensitive to either penicillin or any one of three cephalosporins.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>There seems to be a high risk of adverse reactions to penicillins and other cephalosporins in children with a history of type I hypersensitivity reaction to cephalosporins. Therefore, skin testing with both cephalosporins and penicillins should be performed in patients with a history of cephalosporin allergy.</p>","PeriodicalId":42218,"journal":{"name":"Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11250002/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14744/SEMB.2024.08286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: The cross-reactivity problem between cephalosporins and penicillins has mainly been evaluated in the context of patients allergic to penicillins. However, we have little data regarding the opposite aspect of the problem, i.e. the cross-reactivity in subjects primarily sensitized to cephalosporins. This prospective study aims to evaluate the cross-reactivity to penicillins and some other cephalosporins in patients with immediate allergic reactions to cephalosporins.

Methods: The study included 21 children with immediate allergic reactions to at least one cephalosporin. Skin testing was performed with a panel of minor and major determinant mixtures of penicillins and three commonly used cephalosporins (cephazoline, cefuroxime and ceftriaxone).

Results: The children had used 5.14±4.91 (1-15) times any beta-lactam antibiotic in the previous year and the most common cephalosporins accused were ceftriaxone (42.92%), and cefuroxime, cefazolin, cefixime, cefprozil and cefotaxime (9.5% each). Skin tests were positive for any cephalosporin in 14 (66.7%) subjects and penicillin allergens in 15 (71.4%) subjects. Totally, 85.7% of children with a positive allergy history to cephalosporins were found to be sensitive to either penicillin or any one of three cephalosporins.

Conclusion: There seems to be a high risk of adverse reactions to penicillins and other cephalosporins in children with a history of type I hypersensitivity reaction to cephalosporins. Therefore, skin testing with both cephalosporins and penicillins should be performed in patients with a history of cephalosporin allergy.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估有头孢菌素过敏史的儿童对青霉素类和头孢菌素的交叉反应。
目的:头孢菌素与青霉素之间的交叉反应问题主要是在对青霉素过敏的患者中进行评估的。然而,我们对该问题的另一面,即主要对头孢菌素过敏的受试者的交叉反应却知之甚少。本前瞻性研究旨在评估对头孢菌素类药物立即过敏的患者对青霉素类药物和其他一些头孢菌素类药物的交叉反应:研究包括 21 名至少对一种头孢菌素立即发生过敏反应的儿童。用青霉素类和三种常用头孢菌素(头孢唑啉、头孢呋辛和头孢曲松)的小决定簇和大决定簇混合物进行皮肤试验:儿童在过去一年中使用过5.14±4.91(1-15)次任何β-内酰胺类抗生素,最常见的头孢菌素是头孢曲松(42.92%)、头孢呋辛、头孢唑啉、头孢克肟、头孢丙烯和头孢他啶(各占9.5%)。14名受试者(66.7%)对任何头孢菌素类药物的皮试结果呈阳性,15名受试者(71.4%)对青霉素过敏原的皮试结果呈阳性。在对头孢菌素过敏史呈阳性的儿童中,85.7%的人对青霉素或三种头孢菌素中的任何一种都敏感:结论:对头孢菌素有 I 型超敏反应史的儿童对青霉素类和其他头孢菌素类药物发生不良反应的风险似乎很高。因此,对于有头孢菌素过敏史的患者,应同时进行头孢菌素类和青霉素类的皮试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital
Medical Bulletin of Sisli Etfal Hospital MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
16.70%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
An Analytical Comparison of Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma Patients Manifested with or without Graves' Disease. Can Galanin Be Used as a Marker of Microvascular Dysfunction in Prehypertensives? Can Laryngeal Mask Airway be the First Choice for Tracheal Stenosis Surgery? A Historical Cohort Study. Coexistence of Thyroglossal Cyst and Thyroid Disease in Adults: Surgical Outcomes From A Single Center. Comparative Analysis of Pain and Duration in Panretinal Photocoagulation: Navilas Laser versus Conventional Laser in Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1