Acute Effects of Cadence-Controlled Walking on Cognition and Vascular Function in Physically Inactive Older Adults: A Randomized Crossover Study.

IF 1.4 4区 医学 Q4 GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY Journal of Aging and Physical Activity Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1123/japa.2023-0363
Peixuan Zheng, Hayley V MacDonald, Mark T Richardson, Kaiwen Man, Ian M McDonough, Elroy J Aguiar
{"title":"Acute Effects of Cadence-Controlled Walking on Cognition and Vascular Function in Physically Inactive Older Adults: A Randomized Crossover Study.","authors":"Peixuan Zheng, Hayley V MacDonald, Mark T Richardson, Kaiwen Man, Ian M McDonough, Elroy J Aguiar","doi":"10.1123/japa.2023-0363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Cadence-controlled walking may be a desirable approach for older adults to self-monitor exercise intensity and achieve physical activity guidelines. We examined the acute effects of cadence-controlled walking on cognition and vascular function in physically inactive older adults.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In a randomized crossover design, 26 participants (65% females, 67.8 ± 11.3 years) underwent 30-min acute exercise (walking at 100 steps/min) and control (sitting) conditions. We measured cognition, central blood pressure (BP), and arterial stiffness before, and immediately, after each condition.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We observed significant Time × Condition interactions in the Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention (Flanker) test and Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS) test scores, and in central systolic BP, central pulse pressure, and carotid to femoral pulse wave velocity (p < .05). The Flanker and DCCS scores significantly increased after walking (d = 0.4 and 0.5, respectively), but not after sitting. Central systolic BP, central pulse pressure, and carotid to femoral pulse wave velocity significantly increased after sitting but remained unchanged after acute walking (d = 0.4-0.2), with p-values < .05. After walking, significant correlations were observed between DCCS and diastolic BP and central pulse pressure change scores and change scores in central pulse wave velocity, Flanker, and DCCS (rs = -0.45 to -0.52).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>These findings suggest that a single bout of cadence-controlled walking elicited an immediate improvement in cognition and might have mitigated increases in arterial stiffness and central BP observed in the seated control condition. Further research is needed to examine the association between cognition and vascular function following acute exercise compared to control conditions.</p><p><strong>Significance: </strong>Our findings may have practical implications for developing daily physical activity recommendations for improving the cognitive health for successful aging.</p>","PeriodicalId":51073,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Aging and Physical Activity","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/japa.2023-0363","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"GERIATRICS & GERONTOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Cadence-controlled walking may be a desirable approach for older adults to self-monitor exercise intensity and achieve physical activity guidelines. We examined the acute effects of cadence-controlled walking on cognition and vascular function in physically inactive older adults.

Methods: In a randomized crossover design, 26 participants (65% females, 67.8 ± 11.3 years) underwent 30-min acute exercise (walking at 100 steps/min) and control (sitting) conditions. We measured cognition, central blood pressure (BP), and arterial stiffness before, and immediately, after each condition.

Results: We observed significant Time × Condition interactions in the Flanker Inhibitory Control and Attention (Flanker) test and Dimensional Change Card Sort (DCCS) test scores, and in central systolic BP, central pulse pressure, and carotid to femoral pulse wave velocity (p < .05). The Flanker and DCCS scores significantly increased after walking (d = 0.4 and 0.5, respectively), but not after sitting. Central systolic BP, central pulse pressure, and carotid to femoral pulse wave velocity significantly increased after sitting but remained unchanged after acute walking (d = 0.4-0.2), with p-values < .05. After walking, significant correlations were observed between DCCS and diastolic BP and central pulse pressure change scores and change scores in central pulse wave velocity, Flanker, and DCCS (rs = -0.45 to -0.52).

Conclusion: These findings suggest that a single bout of cadence-controlled walking elicited an immediate improvement in cognition and might have mitigated increases in arterial stiffness and central BP observed in the seated control condition. Further research is needed to examine the association between cognition and vascular function following acute exercise compared to control conditions.

Significance: Our findings may have practical implications for developing daily physical activity recommendations for improving the cognitive health for successful aging.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
步调控制步行对不运动老年人认知和血管功能的急性影响:随机交叉研究》。
背景:步调控制步行可能是老年人自我监控运动强度和实现体育锻炼目标的一种理想方法。我们研究了步频控制步行对不参加体育锻炼的老年人的认知和血管功能的急性影响:在随机交叉设计中,26 名参与者(65% 为女性,67.8 ± 11.3 岁)分别接受了 30 分钟的急性运动(以 100 步/分钟的速度行走)和对照(坐姿)训练。我们在每次运动前和运动后立即测量了认知能力、中心血压和动脉僵硬度:结果:我们观察到,在侧翼抑制控制和注意力(Flanker)测试和维度变化卡片分类(DCCS)测试得分以及中心收缩压、中心脉压和颈动脉至股动脉脉搏波速度方面,时间与条件之间存在明显的交互作用(P < .05)。行走后 Flanker 和 DCCS 分数显著增加(分别为 d = 0.4 和 0.5),但坐着后没有增加。中心收缩压、中心脉压和颈动脉至股动脉脉搏波速度在坐位后显著增加,但在急性行走后保持不变(d = 0.4-0.2),p 值均小于 0.05。行走后,观察到 DCCS 和舒张压、中心脉压变化评分与中心脉搏波速度、Flanker 和 DCCS 变化评分之间存在明显相关性(rs = -0.45 至 -0.52):这些研究结果表明,单次的步频控制步行能立即改善认知,并可能减轻坐姿对照组中观察到的动脉僵化和中心血压的增加。与对照组相比,还需要进一步研究急性运动后认知和血管功能之间的关联:意义:我们的研究结果可能对制定日常体育锻炼建议,改善认知健康,实现成功老龄化具有实际意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
6.70%
发文量
105
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aging and Physical Activity (JAPA) is a multidisciplinary journal that publishes peer-reviewed original research reports, scholarly reviews, and professional-application articles on the relationship between physical activity and the aging process. The journal encourages the submission of articles that can contribute to an understanding of (a) the impact of physical activity on physiological, psychological, and social aspects of older adults and (b) the effect of advancing age or the aging process on physical activity among older adults. In addition to publishing research reports and reviews, JAPA publishes articles that examine the development, implementation, and evaluation of physical activity programs among older adults. Articles from the biological, behavioral, and social sciences, as well as from fields such as medicine, clinical psychology, physical and recreational therapy, health, physical education, and recreation, are appropriate for the journal. Studies using animal models do not fit within our mission statement and should be submitted elsewhere.
期刊最新文献
The ESCAPE Trial for Older People With Chronic Low Back Pain: A Feasibility Study of a Clinical Trial of Group-Based Exercise in Primary Health Care. Effects of Tai Chi Chuan on Older Adults' Balance: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analysis. The Current Status of Leisure Constraints, Leisure Sports Behaviors, and Active Aging Among Chinese Older Adults. Whey Protein Supplementation in Older Adults With Type 2 Diabetes Undergoing a Resistance Training Program: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. Association of Daily Physical Activity With Motivation in Prefrail and Frail Older Adults Living in Retirement Communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1