Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Lateralized Glenoid Baseplates Has Superior Patient-determined Outcome Scores at Short-term Follow-up.

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 ORTHOPEDICS Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons Pub Date : 2024-11-15 Epub Date: 2024-07-16 DOI:10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00407
Keith M Baumgarten, Carson Max
{"title":"Reverse Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Using Lateralized Glenoid Baseplates Has Superior Patient-determined Outcome Scores at Short-term Follow-up.","authors":"Keith M Baumgarten, Carson Max","doi":"10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00407","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>There are a variety of baseplate options when performing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal glenoid baseplate. The hypothesis of this study was that the use of lateralized baseplates would improve patient-determined outcomes and postoperative range of motion after RTSA compared with standard baseplates without increasing the risk of complications.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Patients undergoing RTSA were stratified into a standard baseplate group (SBG) and a lateralized baseplate group (LBG). The LBG included 3 mm lateralization, 6 mm lateralization, and full-wedge augmentation (8 mm lateralization). The Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) were recorded at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years. Range of motion was recorded at baseline and 1 year. Differences in complications between groups were recorded.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The LBG included 187 patients, and the SBG included 51 patients. No difference was observed in any patient-determined outcome score at 1-year follow-up. At 2 years, there were greater Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score (84 ± 16 versus 74 ± 19; P = 0.01), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (81 ± 15 versus 70 ± 20; P = 0.001), SST (8.0 ± 2.4 versus 6.6 ± 2.6; P = 0.007), and SANE (82 ± 17 versus 68 ± 25; P = 0.0005). The improvement in SST (5.0 ± 2.7 versus 3.3 ± 3.6; P = 0.02) and SANE (54 ± 26 versus 37 ± 30; P = 0.004) at 2 years compared with baseline was greater in the LBG compared with the SBG. No difference was observed in any range-of-motion metric between groups. Total complications were similar between groups ( P = 0.91). Scapular notching was more prevalent in the SBG (7.8% versus 1.6%; P = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The LBG had better patient-determined outcome scores compared with the SBG at 2-year follow-up with a similar rate of overall complications but a lower rate of scapular notching. Range of motion was not improved by the use of a lateralized baseplate compared with a standard baseplate.</p>","PeriodicalId":51098,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","volume":" ","pages":"e1176-e1185"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5435/JAAOS-D-24-00407","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/16 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: There are a variety of baseplate options when performing reverse total shoulder arthroplasty (RTSA). Currently, there is no consensus on the optimal glenoid baseplate. The hypothesis of this study was that the use of lateralized baseplates would improve patient-determined outcomes and postoperative range of motion after RTSA compared with standard baseplates without increasing the risk of complications.

Methods: Patients undergoing RTSA were stratified into a standard baseplate group (SBG) and a lateralized baseplate group (LBG). The LBG included 3 mm lateralization, 6 mm lateralization, and full-wedge augmentation (8 mm lateralization). The Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Simple Shoulder Test (SST) were recorded at baseline, 1 year, and 2 years. Range of motion was recorded at baseline and 1 year. Differences in complications between groups were recorded.

Results: The LBG included 187 patients, and the SBG included 51 patients. No difference was observed in any patient-determined outcome score at 1-year follow-up. At 2 years, there were greater Western Ontario Osteoarthritis Score (84 ± 16 versus 74 ± 19; P = 0.01), American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (81 ± 15 versus 70 ± 20; P = 0.001), SST (8.0 ± 2.4 versus 6.6 ± 2.6; P = 0.007), and SANE (82 ± 17 versus 68 ± 25; P = 0.0005). The improvement in SST (5.0 ± 2.7 versus 3.3 ± 3.6; P = 0.02) and SANE (54 ± 26 versus 37 ± 30; P = 0.004) at 2 years compared with baseline was greater in the LBG compared with the SBG. No difference was observed in any range-of-motion metric between groups. Total complications were similar between groups ( P = 0.91). Scapular notching was more prevalent in the SBG (7.8% versus 1.6%; P = 0.01).

Conclusion: The LBG had better patient-determined outcome scores compared with the SBG at 2-year follow-up with a similar rate of overall complications but a lower rate of scapular notching. Range of motion was not improved by the use of a lateralized baseplate compared with a standard baseplate.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
使用侧向盂基板的反向全肩关节置换术在短期随访中的患者自定结果评分较高。
简介:在进行反向全肩关节置换术(RTSA)时,有多种基板可供选择。目前,关于最佳的盂基底板还没有达成共识。本研究的假设是,与标准基底板相比,使用侧向基底板可改善患者决定的结果和RTSA术后活动范围,同时不会增加并发症风险:方法:将接受 RTSA 的患者分为标准基底板组(SBG)和侧向基底板组(LBG)。LBG包括3毫米侧向化、6毫米侧向化和全缘增强(8毫米侧向化)。在基线、1 年和 2 年时记录了西安大略省骨关节炎评分、美国肩肘外科医生评分、单次数字评估 (SANE) 和简单肩关节测试 (SST)。在基线和 1 年时记录活动范围。记录各组间并发症的差异:结果:LBG 组包括 187 名患者,SBG 组包括 51 名患者。随访 1 年时,患者自定的结果评分均无差异。2 年后,西安大略骨关节炎评分(84 ± 16 对 74 ± 19;P = 0.01)、美国肩肘外科医生评分(81 ± 15 对 70 ± 20;P = 0.001)、SST(8.0 ± 2.4 对 6.6 ± 2.6;P = 0.007)和 SANE(82 ± 17 对 68 ± 25;P = 0.0005)均有所提高。与基线相比,2 年后 LBG 的 SST(5.0 ± 2.7 对 3.3 ± 3.6;P = 0.02)和 SANE(54 ± 26 对 37 ± 30;P = 0.004)改善幅度大于 SBG。各组之间的运动范围指标均无差异。两组的总并发症相似(P = 0.91)。SBG组的肩胛骨切迹发生率更高(7.8%对1.6%;P = 0.01):结论:在2年的随访中,LBG与SBG相比,患者自行决定的结果评分更好,总体并发症发生率相似,但肩胛骨切迹发生率更低。与标准基底板相比,侧向基底板并未改善活动范围。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
529
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons was established in the fall of 1993 by the Academy in response to its membership’s demand for a clinical review journal. Two issues were published the first year, followed by six issues yearly from 1994 through 2004. In September 2005, JAAOS began publishing monthly issues. Each issue includes richly illustrated peer-reviewed articles focused on clinical diagnosis and management. Special features in each issue provide commentary on developments in pharmacotherapeutics, materials and techniques, and computer applications.
期刊最新文献
The 2024 Kappa Delta and OREF Awards. The 2024 Kappa Delta Young Investigator Award: Leveraging Insights From Development to Improve Adult Repair: Hedgehog Signaling as a Master Regulator of Enthesis Fibrocartilage Formation. The Role of Amino Acid Supplementation in Orthopaedic Surgery: Erratum. Risk Factors of Failure to Discharge Before "Two Midnights" in Outpatient-Designated Total Hip Arthroplasty. Cost Difference in Performing Total Knee Arthroplasty at Ambulatory Surgical Centers Compared With Hospital-Based Outpatient Departments: Observational Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1