[Ophthalmological traits in older adult and risk of Alzheimer's disease: results from a French geriatric cohort].

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 PSYCHIATRY Geriatrie et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie De Vieillissement Pub Date : 2024-06-01 DOI:10.1684/pnv.2024.1168
Maxime Pepin, Philippe Gohier, Cédric Annweiler
{"title":"[Ophthalmological traits in older adult and risk of Alzheimer's disease: results from a French geriatric cohort].","authors":"Maxime Pepin, Philippe Gohier, Cédric Annweiler","doi":"10.1684/pnv.2024.1168","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Ophthalmological changes have been reported in Alzheimer's patients. Our objectives were to determine whether: i) GCC (ganglion cell complex) and RNFL (retinal nerve fibre layer) thickness were associated with different stages of AD (i.e., no AD, prodromal AD, dementia-stage AD), and ii) GCC and RNFL thickness predicted disease progression in older non-demented patients with subjective memory complaints followed for four years. Ninety-one French older community-dwellers with memory complaint and without open-angle glaucoma or age-related macular degeneration (mean, 71.60 ± 4,73 years; 44% women) from the GAIT study underwent examination with HD-OCT, measuring the thickness of the macula, the macular GCC and the RNFL. They also had a complete cognitive diagnosis (i.e., cognitively healthy, prodromal AD, or dementia AD), and a cognitive follow-up 4 years later looking for a possible conversion. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), number of comorbidities, and Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) score were considered as potential confounders. At baseline, 37 (40.7%) patients were diagnosed as cognitively healthy, 47 (51.6%) as MCI, and 7 (7.7%) as AD. Mean GCC thickness was higher in cognitively healthy patients than in MCI patients (79.23 vs. 76.27 μm, p = 0.023), particularly in the inferior and nasal fields (p = 0.023 and p = 0.005, respectively). This difference was also found between cognitively healthy patients and others (MCI and AD) in the superior, inferior and nasal fields (p = 0.030, p = 0.014 and p = 0.002, respectively). There was no difference in RNFL thickness between the different cognitive statuses. After 4 years of follow-up, 12 patients (70.6%) of the 17 followed had not changed their cognitive status, while 5 (29.4%) had converted to a more advanced stage of AD. There were no significant differences between the two groups in either GCC thickness (p = 0.429) or RNFL thickness (p = 0.286). We found decreased CGG thicknesses in Alzheimer's patients at prodromal and dementia stages, compared with cognitively healthy participants. There was no association between RNFL thickness and cognitive status, nor between CCG or RNFL thicknesses and the risk of progressing to AD stages after 4 years of follow-up.</p>","PeriodicalId":51244,"journal":{"name":"Geriatrie et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie De Vieillissement","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geriatrie et Psychologie Neuropsychiatrie De Vieillissement","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1684/pnv.2024.1168","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Ophthalmological changes have been reported in Alzheimer's patients. Our objectives were to determine whether: i) GCC (ganglion cell complex) and RNFL (retinal nerve fibre layer) thickness were associated with different stages of AD (i.e., no AD, prodromal AD, dementia-stage AD), and ii) GCC and RNFL thickness predicted disease progression in older non-demented patients with subjective memory complaints followed for four years. Ninety-one French older community-dwellers with memory complaint and without open-angle glaucoma or age-related macular degeneration (mean, 71.60 ± 4,73 years; 44% women) from the GAIT study underwent examination with HD-OCT, measuring the thickness of the macula, the macular GCC and the RNFL. They also had a complete cognitive diagnosis (i.e., cognitively healthy, prodromal AD, or dementia AD), and a cognitive follow-up 4 years later looking for a possible conversion. Age, sex, body mass index (BMI), number of comorbidities, and Instrumental activities of daily living (IADL) score were considered as potential confounders. At baseline, 37 (40.7%) patients were diagnosed as cognitively healthy, 47 (51.6%) as MCI, and 7 (7.7%) as AD. Mean GCC thickness was higher in cognitively healthy patients than in MCI patients (79.23 vs. 76.27 μm, p = 0.023), particularly in the inferior and nasal fields (p = 0.023 and p = 0.005, respectively). This difference was also found between cognitively healthy patients and others (MCI and AD) in the superior, inferior and nasal fields (p = 0.030, p = 0.014 and p = 0.002, respectively). There was no difference in RNFL thickness between the different cognitive statuses. After 4 years of follow-up, 12 patients (70.6%) of the 17 followed had not changed their cognitive status, while 5 (29.4%) had converted to a more advanced stage of AD. There were no significant differences between the two groups in either GCC thickness (p = 0.429) or RNFL thickness (p = 0.286). We found decreased CGG thicknesses in Alzheimer's patients at prodromal and dementia stages, compared with cognitively healthy participants. There was no association between RNFL thickness and cognitive status, nor between CCG or RNFL thicknesses and the risk of progressing to AD stages after 4 years of follow-up.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
[老年人的眼科特征与阿尔茨海默病风险:法国老年队列的研究结果]。
阿尔茨海默病患者的眼部变化已有报道。我们的目的是确定:i)GCC(神经节细胞复合体)和 RNFL(视网膜神经纤维层)厚度是否与阿兹海默症的不同阶段(即无阿兹海默氏症、阿兹海默氏症前驱期、阿兹海默氏症痴呆期)相关;ii)GCC 和 RNFL 厚度是否可预测主观记忆症状的非痴呆老年患者的疾病进展。来自GAIT研究的91名有记忆障碍且无开角型青光眼或老年性黄斑变性的法国老年社区居民(平均71.60 ± 4.73岁;44%为女性)接受了HD-OCT检查,测量了黄斑、黄斑GCC和RNFL的厚度。他们还进行了完整的认知诊断(即认知健康、AD 前兆或 AD 痴呆),并在 4 年后进行了认知随访,以寻找可能的转换。年龄、性别、体重指数(BMI)、合并症数量和日常生活工具(IADL)评分被视为潜在的混杂因素。基线时,37 名患者(40.7%)被诊断为认知健康,47 名患者(51.6%)被诊断为 MCI,7 名患者(7.7%)被诊断为 AD。认知健康患者的平均 GCC 厚度高于 MCI 患者(79.23 vs. 76.27 μm,p = 0.023),尤其是在下野和鼻野(分别为 p = 0.023 和 p = 0.005)。认知健康患者与其他患者(MCI 和 AD)在上视野、下视野和鼻视野也存在这种差异(分别为 p = 0.030、p = 0.014 和 p = 0.002)。不同认知状态的患者的 RNFL 厚度没有差异。经过4年的随访,17名随访者中有12名患者(70.6%)的认知状态没有改变,而有5名患者(29.4%)转入了更晚期的AD阶段。两组患者的 GCC 厚度(p = 0.429)或 RNFL 厚度(p = 0.286)均无明显差异。与认知健康的参与者相比,我们发现处于前驱期和痴呆期的阿尔茨海默氏症患者的 CGG 厚度有所下降。RNFL 厚度与认知状况之间没有关联,CCG 或 RNFL 厚度与 4 年随访后发展到阿兹海默症阶段的风险之间也没有关联。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: D''une qualité scientifique reconnue cette revue est, la première revue francophone gériatrique et psychologique indexée dans les principales bases de données internationales. Elle couvre tous les aspects médicaux, psychologiques, sanitaires et sociaux liés au suivi et à la prise en charge de la personne âgée. Que vous soyez psychologues, neurologues, psychiatres, gériatres, gérontologues,... vous trouverez à travers cette approche originale et unique, un veritable outil de formation, de réflexion et d''échanges indispensable à votre pratique professionnelle.
期刊最新文献
[Clostridioides difficile infections: Update and therapeutic guidelines]. [Prevalence and factors related to frailty dwelling home elderly -subjects using a modified SEGA scale: a study in primary care]. Fragility and quality of life, the benefits of physical activity for the elderly [SEGA frailty scale in emergency: back to basics]. [Geriatric failure to thrive: between illusory diagnosis and clinical reality].
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1