A Prediction Model for Pelvic Floor Recovery After Vaginal Birth With Risk Factors.

IF 1.2 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.) Pub Date : 2025-08-01 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001556
Pamela S Fairchild, Lisa Kane Low, Mary Duarte Thibault, Katherine M Kowalk, Giselle E Kolenic, Dee E Fenner
{"title":"A Prediction Model for Pelvic Floor Recovery After Vaginal Birth With Risk Factors.","authors":"Pamela S Fairchild, Lisa Kane Low, Mary Duarte Thibault, Katherine M Kowalk, Giselle E Kolenic, Dee E Fenner","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Although parturients report few postpartum symptoms, birth is clearly associated with future symptom development. The ability to identify asymptomatic at-risk women would facilitate prevention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to develop a model predicting abnormal recovery in women at risk for childbirth-associated pelvic floor injury.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Women undergoing first vaginal birth at high risk of pelvic floor injury underwent examinations and ultrasound imaging and completed 6-week and 6-month postpartum questionnaires. We defined \"abnormal\" recovery as having ≥1 of the following 3 findings: (1) levator ani injury, (2) decreased objective pelvic floor strength, and (3) Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification point Bp ≥0. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses compared \"normal\" and \"abnormal\" recovery. Birth characteristics, 6-week examinations, and questionnaires potentially predicted abnormal recovery at 6 months. Significant variables were included as candidates in the multivariable logistic regression predicting \"abnormal\" recovery after birth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four women (63.5%) had normal and 31 (36.5%) had abnormal recovery at 6 months. At 6 weeks, women with abnormal recovery had decreased pelvic floor strength by Oxford scores (3 [2-5], 6 [2-8]; P  = 0.002), lower point Bp (-1 [-3 to 0], -2 [-3 to -1]; P  = 0.02), larger genital hiatus (4 [3 to 4], 3 [3 to 3.5]; P  = 0.02), and higher levator ani injury rate (76.7%, 22.4%; P  < 0.001). Between-group questionnaire differences were not clinically significant. Our final model included postpartum examination findings or birth characteristics: Oxford Scale, 6-week Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification GH strain, infant head circumference, and second stage ≥120 minutes. The area under the curve for predicting abnormal recovery at 6 months was 0.84, indicating a good sensitivity and specificity balance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model identifies women at risk for an abnormal recovery trajectory.</p>","PeriodicalId":75288,"journal":{"name":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","volume":" ","pages":"767-774"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Urogynecology (Hagerstown, Md.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Although parturients report few postpartum symptoms, birth is clearly associated with future symptom development. The ability to identify asymptomatic at-risk women would facilitate prevention.

Objective: The aim of the study was to develop a model predicting abnormal recovery in women at risk for childbirth-associated pelvic floor injury.

Study design: Women undergoing first vaginal birth at high risk of pelvic floor injury underwent examinations and ultrasound imaging and completed 6-week and 6-month postpartum questionnaires. We defined "abnormal" recovery as having ≥1 of the following 3 findings: (1) levator ani injury, (2) decreased objective pelvic floor strength, and (3) Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification point Bp ≥0. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses compared "normal" and "abnormal" recovery. Birth characteristics, 6-week examinations, and questionnaires potentially predicted abnormal recovery at 6 months. Significant variables were included as candidates in the multivariable logistic regression predicting "abnormal" recovery after birth.

Results: Fifty-four women (63.5%) had normal and 31 (36.5%) had abnormal recovery at 6 months. At 6 weeks, women with abnormal recovery had decreased pelvic floor strength by Oxford scores (3 [2-5], 6 [2-8]; P  = 0.002), lower point Bp (-1 [-3 to 0], -2 [-3 to -1]; P  = 0.02), larger genital hiatus (4 [3 to 4], 3 [3 to 3.5]; P  = 0.02), and higher levator ani injury rate (76.7%, 22.4%; P  < 0.001). Between-group questionnaire differences were not clinically significant. Our final model included postpartum examination findings or birth characteristics: Oxford Scale, 6-week Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification GH strain, infant head circumference, and second stage ≥120 minutes. The area under the curve for predicting abnormal recovery at 6 months was 0.84, indicating a good sensitivity and specificity balance.

Conclusion: The model identifies women at risk for an abnormal recovery trajectory.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
带有风险因素的阴道分娩后盆底恢复预测模型
重要性:虽然产妇很少报告产后症状,但分娩显然与未来症状的发展有关。识别无症状高危产妇的能力将有助于预防:研究目的:本研究旨在建立一个模型,预测分娩相关盆底损伤高危产妇的异常恢复情况:研究设计:首次经阴道分娩的盆底损伤高危产妇接受检查和超声波成像,并完成产后 6 周和 6 个月的问卷调查。我们将 "异常 "恢复定义为以下3项结果中≥1项:(1)提肌损伤;(2)客观盆底力量下降;(3)盆腔脏器脱垂定量点Bp≥0。描述性统计和双变量分析比较了 "正常 "和 "异常 "恢复。出生特征、6 周检查和调查问卷都有可能预测 6 个月后的异常恢复。在预测产后 "异常 "恢复的多变量逻辑回归中,重要变量被列为候选变量:54 名妇女(63.5%)在 6 个月时恢复正常,31 名妇女(36.5%)恢复异常。6 周时,根据牛津评分,恢复异常的产妇骨盆底力量下降(3 [2-5],6 [2-8];P = 0.002),Bp 点降低(-1 [-3 to 0],-2 [-3 to -1]; P = 0.02),生殖器裂隙增大(4 [3 to 4],3 [3 to 3.5];P = 0.02),提肛肌损伤率升高(76.7%,22.4%;P < 0.001)。组间问卷差异无临床意义。我们的最终模型包括产后检查结果或出生特征:牛津量表、6 周骨盆器官脱垂定量 GH 应变、婴儿头围和第二产程≥120 分钟。预测 6 个月时异常恢复的曲线下面积为 0.84,表明灵敏度和特异性平衡良好:结论:该模型可识别有异常恢复风险的妇女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cost Analysis of Supracervical Versus Total Hysterectomy During Sacrocolpopexy. Perioperative Antibiotic Choice and Urinary Tract Infections in Prolapse Surgery. Effect of Interpregnancy Interval on the Development of Pelvic Floor Disorders. Preoperative Vaginal Preparation and Infection After Gynecologic Surgery. A Randomized Trial of a Texting Platform for Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1