A Prediction Model for Pelvic Floor Recovery After Vaginal Birth With Risk Factors.

Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1097/SPV.0000000000001556
Pamela S Fairchild, Lisa Kane Low, Mary Duarte Thibault, Katherine M Kowalk, Giselle E Kolenic, Dee E Fenner
{"title":"A Prediction Model for Pelvic Floor Recovery After Vaginal Birth With Risk Factors.","authors":"Pamela S Fairchild, Lisa Kane Low, Mary Duarte Thibault, Katherine M Kowalk, Giselle E Kolenic, Dee E Fenner","doi":"10.1097/SPV.0000000000001556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Importance: </strong>Although parturients report few postpartum symptoms, birth is clearly associated with future symptom development. The ability to identify asymptomatic at-risk women would facilitate prevention.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of the study was to develop a model predicting abnormal recovery in women at risk for childbirth-associated pelvic floor injury.</p><p><strong>Study design: </strong>Women undergoing first vaginal birth at high risk of pelvic floor injury underwent examinations and ultrasound imaging and completed 6-week and 6-month postpartum questionnaires. We defined \"abnormal\" recovery as having ≥1 of the following 3 findings: (1) levator ani injury, (2) decreased objective pelvic floor strength, and (3) Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification point Bp ≥0. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses compared \"normal\" and \"abnormal\" recovery. Birth characteristics, 6-week examinations, and questionnaires potentially predicted abnormal recovery at 6 months. Significant variables were included as candidates in the multivariable logistic regression predicting \"abnormal\" recovery after birth.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Fifty-four women (63.5%) had normal and 31 (36.5%) had abnormal recovery at 6 months. At 6 weeks, women with abnormal recovery had decreased pelvic floor strength by Oxford scores (3 [2-5], 6 [2-8]; P = 0.002), lower point Bp (-1 [-3 to 0], -2 [-3 to -1]; P = 0.02), larger genital hiatus (4 [3 to 4], 3 [3 to 3.5]; P = 0.02), and higher levator ani injury rate (76.7%, 22.4%; P < 0.001). Between-group questionnaire differences were not clinically significant. Our final model included postpartum examination findings or birth characteristics: Oxford Scale, 6-week Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification GH strain, infant head circumference, and second stage ≥120 minutes. The area under the curve for predicting abnormal recovery at 6 months was 0.84, indicating a good sensitivity and specificity balance.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The model identifies women at risk for an abnormal recovery trajectory.</p>","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/SPV.0000000000001556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Importance: Although parturients report few postpartum symptoms, birth is clearly associated with future symptom development. The ability to identify asymptomatic at-risk women would facilitate prevention.

Objective: The aim of the study was to develop a model predicting abnormal recovery in women at risk for childbirth-associated pelvic floor injury.

Study design: Women undergoing first vaginal birth at high risk of pelvic floor injury underwent examinations and ultrasound imaging and completed 6-week and 6-month postpartum questionnaires. We defined "abnormal" recovery as having ≥1 of the following 3 findings: (1) levator ani injury, (2) decreased objective pelvic floor strength, and (3) Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification point Bp ≥0. Descriptive statistics and bivariate analyses compared "normal" and "abnormal" recovery. Birth characteristics, 6-week examinations, and questionnaires potentially predicted abnormal recovery at 6 months. Significant variables were included as candidates in the multivariable logistic regression predicting "abnormal" recovery after birth.

Results: Fifty-four women (63.5%) had normal and 31 (36.5%) had abnormal recovery at 6 months. At 6 weeks, women with abnormal recovery had decreased pelvic floor strength by Oxford scores (3 [2-5], 6 [2-8]; P = 0.002), lower point Bp (-1 [-3 to 0], -2 [-3 to -1]; P = 0.02), larger genital hiatus (4 [3 to 4], 3 [3 to 3.5]; P = 0.02), and higher levator ani injury rate (76.7%, 22.4%; P < 0.001). Between-group questionnaire differences were not clinically significant. Our final model included postpartum examination findings or birth characteristics: Oxford Scale, 6-week Pelvic Organ Prolapse Quantification GH strain, infant head circumference, and second stage ≥120 minutes. The area under the curve for predicting abnormal recovery at 6 months was 0.84, indicating a good sensitivity and specificity balance.

Conclusion: The model identifies women at risk for an abnormal recovery trajectory.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
带有风险因素的阴道分娩后盆底恢复预测模型
重要性:虽然产妇很少报告产后症状,但分娩显然与未来症状的发展有关。识别无症状高危产妇的能力将有助于预防:研究目的:本研究旨在建立一个模型,预测分娩相关盆底损伤高危产妇的异常恢复情况:研究设计:首次经阴道分娩的盆底损伤高危产妇接受检查和超声波成像,并完成产后 6 周和 6 个月的问卷调查。我们将 "异常 "恢复定义为以下3项结果中≥1项:(1)提肌损伤;(2)客观盆底力量下降;(3)盆腔脏器脱垂定量点Bp≥0。描述性统计和双变量分析比较了 "正常 "和 "异常 "恢复。出生特征、6 周检查和调查问卷都有可能预测 6 个月后的异常恢复。在预测产后 "异常 "恢复的多变量逻辑回归中,重要变量被列为候选变量:54 名妇女(63.5%)在 6 个月时恢复正常,31 名妇女(36.5%)恢复异常。6 周时,根据牛津评分,恢复异常的产妇骨盆底力量下降(3 [2-5],6 [2-8];P = 0.002),Bp 点降低(-1 [-3 to 0],-2 [-3 to -1]; P = 0.02),生殖器裂隙增大(4 [3 to 4],3 [3 to 3.5];P = 0.02),提肛肌损伤率升高(76.7%,22.4%;P < 0.001)。组间问卷差异无临床意义。我们的最终模型包括产后检查结果或出生特征:牛津量表、6 周骨盆器官脱垂定量 GH 应变、婴儿头围和第二产程≥120 分钟。预测 6 个月时异常恢复的曲线下面积为 0.84,表明灵敏度和特异性平衡良好:结论:该模型可识别有异常恢复风险的妇女。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1