Lung Protective Ventilation Adherence and Outcomes for Patients With COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Treated in an Intermediate Care Unit Repurposed to ICU Level of Care.

Q4 Medicine Critical care explorations Pub Date : 2024-07-17 eCollection Date: 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1097/CCE.0000000000001127
Chad H Hochberg, Aaron S Case, Kevin J Psoter, Daniel Brodie, Rebecca H Dezube, Sarina K Sahetya, Carrie Outten, Lara Street, Michelle N Eakin, David N Hager
{"title":"Lung Protective Ventilation Adherence and Outcomes for Patients With COVID-19 Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Treated in an Intermediate Care Unit Repurposed to ICU Level of Care.","authors":"Chad H Hochberg, Aaron S Case, Kevin J Psoter, Daniel Brodie, Rebecca H Dezube, Sarina K Sahetya, Carrie Outten, Lara Street, Michelle N Eakin, David N Hager","doi":"10.1097/CCE.0000000000001127","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>During the COVID-19 pandemic, some centers converted intermediate care units (IMCUs) to COVID-19 ICUs (IMCU/ICUs). In this study, we compared adherence to lung protective ventilation (LPV) and outcomes for patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) treated in an IMCU/ICU versus preexisting medical ICUs (MICUs).</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective observational study using electronic medical record data.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>Two academic medical centers from March 2020 to September 2020 (period 1) and October 2020 to May 2021 (period 2), which capture the first two COVID-19 surges in this health system.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>Adults with COVID-19 receiving invasive mechanical ventilation who met ARDS oxygenation criteria (Pao2/Fio2 ≤ 300 mm Hg or Spo2/Fio2 ≤ 315).</p><p><strong>Interventions: </strong>None.</p><p><strong>Measurements and main results: </strong>We defined LPV adherence as the percent of the first 48 hours of mechanical ventilation that met a restrictive definition of LPV of, tidal volume/predicted body weight (Vt/PBW) less than or equal to 6.5 mL/kg and plateau pressure (Pplat) less than or equal to 30 cm H2o. In an expanded definition, we added that if Pplat is greater than 30 cm H2o, Vt/PBW had to be less than 6.0 mL/kg. Using the restricted definition, period 1 adherence was lower among 133 IMCU/ICU versus 199 MICU patients (92% [95% CI, 50-100] vs. 100% [86-100], p = 0.05). Period 2 adherence was similar between groups (100% [75-100] vs. 95% CI [65-100], p = 0.68). A similar pattern was observed using the expanded definition. For the full study period, the adjusted hazard of death at 90 days was lower in IMCU/ICU versus MICU patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55-0.99]), whereas ventilator liberation by day 28 was similar between groups (adjusted subdistribution HR 1.09 [95% CI, 0.85-1.39]).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In patients with COVID-19 ARDS treated in an IMCU/ICU, LPV adherence was similar to, and observed survival better than those treated in preexisting MICUs. With adequate resources, protocols, and staffing, IMCUs provide an effective source of additional ICU capacity for patients with acute respiratory failure.</p>","PeriodicalId":93957,"journal":{"name":"Critical care explorations","volume":"6 7","pages":"e1127"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11257666/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical care explorations","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/CCE.0000000000001127","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: During the COVID-19 pandemic, some centers converted intermediate care units (IMCUs) to COVID-19 ICUs (IMCU/ICUs). In this study, we compared adherence to lung protective ventilation (LPV) and outcomes for patients with COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) treated in an IMCU/ICU versus preexisting medical ICUs (MICUs).

Design: Retrospective observational study using electronic medical record data.

Setting: Two academic medical centers from March 2020 to September 2020 (period 1) and October 2020 to May 2021 (period 2), which capture the first two COVID-19 surges in this health system.

Patients: Adults with COVID-19 receiving invasive mechanical ventilation who met ARDS oxygenation criteria (Pao2/Fio2 ≤ 300 mm Hg or Spo2/Fio2 ≤ 315).

Interventions: None.

Measurements and main results: We defined LPV adherence as the percent of the first 48 hours of mechanical ventilation that met a restrictive definition of LPV of, tidal volume/predicted body weight (Vt/PBW) less than or equal to 6.5 mL/kg and plateau pressure (Pplat) less than or equal to 30 cm H2o. In an expanded definition, we added that if Pplat is greater than 30 cm H2o, Vt/PBW had to be less than 6.0 mL/kg. Using the restricted definition, period 1 adherence was lower among 133 IMCU/ICU versus 199 MICU patients (92% [95% CI, 50-100] vs. 100% [86-100], p = 0.05). Period 2 adherence was similar between groups (100% [75-100] vs. 95% CI [65-100], p = 0.68). A similar pattern was observed using the expanded definition. For the full study period, the adjusted hazard of death at 90 days was lower in IMCU/ICU versus MICU patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55-0.99]), whereas ventilator liberation by day 28 was similar between groups (adjusted subdistribution HR 1.09 [95% CI, 0.85-1.39]).

Conclusions: In patients with COVID-19 ARDS treated in an IMCU/ICU, LPV adherence was similar to, and observed survival better than those treated in preexisting MICUs. With adequate resources, protocols, and staffing, IMCUs provide an effective source of additional ICU capacity for patients with acute respiratory failure.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在中级护理病房接受治疗的 COVID-19 急性呼吸窘迫综合征患者的肺保护性通气坚持率和疗效,改用重症监护病房护理级别。
目的:在 COVID-19 大流行期间,一些中心将中级护理病房 (IMCU) 转为 COVID-19 重症监护病房 (IMCU/ICU)。在这项研究中,我们比较了在 IMCU/ICU 和原有的内科 ICU(MICU)中接受治疗的 COVID-19 相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)患者坚持肺保护性通气(LPV)的情况和结果:设计:使用电子病历数据进行回顾性观察研究:两个学术医疗中心,时间分别为 2020 年 3 月至 2020 年 9 月(第一阶段)和 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 5 月(第二阶段),这两个阶段是该医疗系统前两次 COVID-19 高峰期:患者:接受有创机械通气且符合 ARDS 氧合标准(Pao2/Fio2 ≤ 300 mm Hg 或 Spo2/Fio2 ≤ 315)的 COVID-19 成人:测量和主要结果我们将LPV依从性定义为符合LPV限制性定义的前48小时机械通气的百分比,即潮气量/预测体重(Vt/PBW)小于或等于6.5 mL/kg,高原压(Pplat)小于或等于30 cm H2o。在扩展定义中,我们增加了一条:如果 Pplat 大于 30 cm H2o,则 Vt/PBW 必须小于 6.0 mL/kg。使用限制性定义后,133 名 IMCU/ICU 患者与 199 名 MICU 患者相比,第一阶段的依从性较低(92% [95% CI, 50-100] vs. 100% [86-100],P = 0.05)。各组患者在第二阶段的依从性相似(100% [75-100] vs. 95% CI [65-100],p = 0.68)。使用扩展定义也观察到类似的模式。在整个研究期间,IMCU/ICU 患者与 MICU 患者相比,调整后的 90 天死亡风险较低(风险比 [HR] 0.73 [95% CI, 0.55-0.99]),而第 28 天脱离呼吸机的情况组间相似(调整后的子分布 HR 1.09 [95% CI, 0.85-1.39]):结论:在 IMCU/ICU 接受治疗的 COVID-19 ARDS 患者中,LPV 的依从性与在原有 MICU 接受治疗的患者相似,观察到的存活率也高于后者。如果有足够的资源、方案和人员,IMCU 可以有效地为急性呼吸衰竭患者提供额外的 ICU 容量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
"Awake" Cannulation of Patients for Venovenous Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygen: An Analysis of the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization Registry. Current Emergency Medical Service Vasoactive Use for the Management of Shock. Critical Data for Critical Care: A Primer on Leveraging Electronic Health Record Data for Research From Society of Critical Care Medicine's Panel on Data Sharing and Harmonization. Clinical Subtype Trajectories in Sepsis Patients Admitted to the ICU: A Secondary Analysis of an Observational Study. Septic Shock Requiring Three Vasopressors: Patient Demographics and Outcomes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1