Effect of empagliflozin in peripheral diabetic neuropathy of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus

{"title":"Effect of empagliflozin in peripheral diabetic neuropathy of patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.medcle.2024.01.028","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is the most dominant cause of neuropathy worldwide, and there has been no specific treatment until now. The aim of the current study was to assess the probable protective effect of empagliflozin in type 2 diabetics who are suffering from DPN.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Fifty eligible type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) cases with diabetic peripheral neuropathy were recruited in this study and classified into 2 groups. Group I (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->25) (control group) received placebo tablets once daily. Group II (<em>n</em> <!-->=<!--> <!-->25) (empagliflozin group) received empagliflozin 25<!--> <!-->mg once daily for three months. Empagliflozin efficacy was evaluated using electrophysiological studies, and HbA1c levels, the brief pain inventory short-form item (BPI-SF) score, the diabetic neuropathy symptom (DNS) score, the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score, and the serum levels of neuron-specific enolase (NSE), malondialdehyde (MDA) and calprotectin (Calpro), lipid profile, and random blood glucose level (RBG).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>After three months, comparing the results of the empagliflozin arm to the control arm showed a significant improvement in the electrophysiological studies and a significant decrease in the BPI-SF score and the mean serum levels of NSE and MDA. However, no significant difference was determined in HbA1c, Calpro, lipid profile, and RBG levels. In addition, the DNS and ASCVD risk scores were not significantly different. The NSE and MDA levels were significantly negatively correlated with the electrophysiological parameters. However, the BPI-SF score showed a non-significant difference.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Empagliflozin may be a promising neuroprotective and therapeutic agent for diabetic peripheral neuropathy.</p><p>Trial registration Identifier: <span><span>NCT05977465</span><svg><path></path></svg></span>.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74154,"journal":{"name":"Medicina clinica (English ed.)","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicina clinica (English ed.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2387020624002882","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background

Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is the most dominant cause of neuropathy worldwide, and there has been no specific treatment until now. The aim of the current study was to assess the probable protective effect of empagliflozin in type 2 diabetics who are suffering from DPN.

Methods

Fifty eligible type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) cases with diabetic peripheral neuropathy were recruited in this study and classified into 2 groups. Group I (n = 25) (control group) received placebo tablets once daily. Group II (n = 25) (empagliflozin group) received empagliflozin 25 mg once daily for three months. Empagliflozin efficacy was evaluated using electrophysiological studies, and HbA1c levels, the brief pain inventory short-form item (BPI-SF) score, the diabetic neuropathy symptom (DNS) score, the atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score, and the serum levels of neuron-specific enolase (NSE), malondialdehyde (MDA) and calprotectin (Calpro), lipid profile, and random blood glucose level (RBG).

Results

After three months, comparing the results of the empagliflozin arm to the control arm showed a significant improvement in the electrophysiological studies and a significant decrease in the BPI-SF score and the mean serum levels of NSE and MDA. However, no significant difference was determined in HbA1c, Calpro, lipid profile, and RBG levels. In addition, the DNS and ASCVD risk scores were not significantly different. The NSE and MDA levels were significantly negatively correlated with the electrophysiological parameters. However, the BPI-SF score showed a non-significant difference.

Conclusions

Empagliflozin may be a promising neuroprotective and therapeutic agent for diabetic peripheral neuropathy.

Trial registration Identifier: NCT05977465.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恩格列净对 2 型糖尿病患者糖尿病周围神经病变的影响
背景糖尿病周围神经病变(DPN)是全球最主要的神经病变原因,迄今为止尚无特效治疗方法。本研究旨在评估替格列净(empagliflozin)对患有 DPN 的 2 型糖尿病患者的可能保护作用。方法本研究招募了 50 例符合条件的患有糖尿病周围神经病变的 2 型糖尿病(T2DM)患者,并将其分为两组。第一组(25 人)(对照组)服用安慰剂,每天一次。第二组(n = 25)(恩帕格列净组)服用恩帕格列净25毫克,每天一次,连续服用三个月。通过电生理学研究、HbA1c水平、简短疼痛清单短式项目(BPI-SF)评分、糖尿病神经病变症状(DNS)评分、动脉粥样硬化性心血管疾病(ASCVD)风险评分、血清神经元特异性烯醇化酶(NSE)、丙二醛(MDA)和钙蛋白(Calpro)水平、血脂谱和随机血糖水平(RBG)来评估恩格列净的疗效。结果三个月后,将恩格列净治疗组与对照组的结果进行比较,发现电生理学研究有显著改善,BPI-SF评分以及NSE和MDA的平均血清水平显著下降。然而,在 HbA1c、Calpro、血脂概况和 RBG 水平方面没有发现明显差异。此外,DNS 和 ASCVD 风险评分也无明显差异。NSE 和 MDA 水平与电生理参数呈显著负相关。结论恩帕格列净可能是一种很有前景的糖尿病周围神经病变神经保护和治疗药物:NCT05977465。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Effectiveness and safety of alirocumab and evolocumab for hypercholesterolemia in a population with high cardiovascular risk Associations of physical activity, sedentary time, and fitness with cardiovascular risk and atherosclerosis over 3 years in women with systemic lupus erythematosus Incidence and clinical impact of inappropriate periprocedural and perioperative management of antiplatelet therapy Health administration key role in curbing antimicrobial resistance Raynaud phenomenon in a baseball player
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1