The effect of music on stress recovery

IF 3.4 2区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM Psychoneuroendocrinology Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1016/j.psyneuen.2024.107137
{"title":"The effect of music on stress recovery","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.psyneuen.2024.107137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>Previous research has suggested beneficial effects of music in reducing stress levels. However, there is no consistent conclusion demonstrating that music can contribute to stress recovery, primarily due to limitations in stress measurement, and inconsistent methodology within existing studies. Our study explores whether relaxing music, especially when self-selected, outperforms non-music acoustic, and silence conditions, fostering both subjective and biological stress recovery.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>One hundred and five healthy female participants underwent the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) before being randomly allocated to one of four conditions: condition 1 (<em>n</em> = 25) listened to researcher-selected relaxing music; condition 2 (<em>n</em> = 27) listened to self-selected relaxing music; condition 3 (<em>n</em> = 26) listened to the sound of rippling water; and condition 4 (<em>n</em> = 27) remained in silence. Stress parameters were repeatedly measured nine times before and after the TSST. Saliva samples were collected for cortisol and saliva alpha-amylase (sAA) analysis, Movisens equipment was used to measure heart rate (HR) and skin conductance levels (SCL), and Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) were used for subjective stress measurement.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The examination of SCL, and VAS scores revealed no significant changes following the four relaxation interventions. Although sAA displayed a significant main effect of condition, post hoc tests did not pinpoint specific differences. HR recovery patterns varied among the four relaxation interventions, with the sound of rippling water condition exhibiting a later significant decrease compared to the other conditions. Exploratory analyses revealed that cortisol levels continued increase in all conditions during intervention phase except the researcher-selected music condition.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The subjective and biological stress markers did not exhibit better recovery after the music stimulus, except for a tendency in the researcher-selected music condition to mitigate the continued increase in cortisol levels after the stress test. Our study provides the first evidence comparing the impact of researcher- and participant-selected music with silence and a non-music acoustic stimulus, on both subjective and biological stress recovery. Our findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the impact of music on stress recovery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":20836,"journal":{"name":"Psychoneuroendocrinology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306453024001811/pdfft?md5=2120f2bda74ff3788ea2450d35b194f0&pid=1-s2.0-S0306453024001811-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychoneuroendocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0306453024001811","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective

Previous research has suggested beneficial effects of music in reducing stress levels. However, there is no consistent conclusion demonstrating that music can contribute to stress recovery, primarily due to limitations in stress measurement, and inconsistent methodology within existing studies. Our study explores whether relaxing music, especially when self-selected, outperforms non-music acoustic, and silence conditions, fostering both subjective and biological stress recovery.

Methods

One hundred and five healthy female participants underwent the Trier Social Stress Test (TSST) before being randomly allocated to one of four conditions: condition 1 (n = 25) listened to researcher-selected relaxing music; condition 2 (n = 27) listened to self-selected relaxing music; condition 3 (n = 26) listened to the sound of rippling water; and condition 4 (n = 27) remained in silence. Stress parameters were repeatedly measured nine times before and after the TSST. Saliva samples were collected for cortisol and saliva alpha-amylase (sAA) analysis, Movisens equipment was used to measure heart rate (HR) and skin conductance levels (SCL), and Visual Analogue Scales (VAS) were used for subjective stress measurement.

Results

The examination of SCL, and VAS scores revealed no significant changes following the four relaxation interventions. Although sAA displayed a significant main effect of condition, post hoc tests did not pinpoint specific differences. HR recovery patterns varied among the four relaxation interventions, with the sound of rippling water condition exhibiting a later significant decrease compared to the other conditions. Exploratory analyses revealed that cortisol levels continued increase in all conditions during intervention phase except the researcher-selected music condition.

Conclusions

The subjective and biological stress markers did not exhibit better recovery after the music stimulus, except for a tendency in the researcher-selected music condition to mitigate the continued increase in cortisol levels after the stress test. Our study provides the first evidence comparing the impact of researcher- and participant-selected music with silence and a non-music acoustic stimulus, on both subjective and biological stress recovery. Our findings contribute to a more nuanced understanding of the impact of music on stress recovery.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
音乐对压力恢复的影响
目的以前的研究表明,音乐对降低压力水平有好处。但是,目前还没有一致的结论表明音乐有助于压力恢复,这主要是由于压力测量的局限性和现有研究方法的不一致。我们的研究探讨了放松的音乐(尤其是自主选择的音乐)是否优于非音乐和安静的环境,从而促进主观和生理压力的恢复。方法 115名健康女性参加者在接受特里尔社会压力测试(TSST)后被随机分配到四个条件之一:条件1(n = 25)聆听研究人员选择的放松音乐;条件2(n = 27)聆听自选的放松音乐;条件3(n = 26)聆听水波荡漾的声音;条件4(n = 27)保持沉默。在 TSST 前后反复测量了九次压力参数。采集的唾液样本用于皮质醇和唾液α-淀粉酶(sAA)分析,Movisens 设备用于测量心率(HR)和皮肤电导水平(SCL),视觉模拟量表(VAS)用于主观压力测量。虽然 sAA 显示出明显的条件主效应,但事后检验并未发现具体差异。四种放松干预措施的心率恢复模式各不相同,与其他条件相比,荡漾的水声条件下的心率显著下降较晚。探索性分析表明,在干预阶段,除了研究人员选择的音乐条件外,所有条件下的皮质醇水平都在持续上升。结论 除了研究人员选择的音乐条件有缓解压力测试后皮质醇水平持续上升的趋势外,主观和生物压力标记物在音乐刺激后并没有表现出更好的恢复效果。我们的研究首次提供了证据,比较了研究者和参与者选择的音乐与沉默和非音乐声学刺激对主观和生物压力恢复的影响。我们的研究结果有助于人们更细致地了解音乐对压力恢复的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Psychoneuroendocrinology
Psychoneuroendocrinology 医学-精神病学
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
8.10%
发文量
268
审稿时长
66 days
期刊介绍: Psychoneuroendocrinology publishes papers dealing with the interrelated disciplines of psychology, neurobiology, endocrinology, immunology, neurology, and psychiatry, with an emphasis on multidisciplinary studies aiming at integrating these disciplines in terms of either basic research or clinical implications. One of the main goals is to understand how a variety of psychobiological factors interact in the expression of the stress response as it relates to the development and/or maintenance of neuropsychiatric illnesses.
期刊最新文献
Elevated testosterone and prosocial behavior in female patients with borderline personality disorder independent of social exclusion Long-term hair cortisone and perceived stress are associated with long-term hedonic eating tendencies in patients with obesity Ventral subiculum control of avoidance behavior and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis reactivity via the bed nucleus of the stria terminalis in male and female mice – ISPNE 2024 Dirk Helhammer Award The hormonal trajectory along gestational age: Cortisol and oxytocin levels profiles Chronic olanzapine treatment leads to increased opioid receptor expression and changes in feeding regulating neurons in the female rat hypothalamus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1