Cross-Sectional Analysis of Australian Dental Practitioners’ Perceptions of Teledentistry

Joshua Lee, J. Park, Hua Wang, Boxi Feng, Kate N Wang
{"title":"Cross-Sectional Analysis of Australian Dental Practitioners’ Perceptions of Teledentistry","authors":"Joshua Lee, J. Park, Hua Wang, Boxi Feng, Kate N Wang","doi":"10.4108/eetsis.5366","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"INTRODUCTION: There has been an increased use of teledentistry by dental practitioners in Australia as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Previous studies conducted analysing the opinions of dental practitioners were performed prior to the pandemic, and therefore it is important to determine if perceptions regarding teledentistry have changed following the outbreak.\nOBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the perceptions of oral healthcare professionals regarding teledentistry in a clinical setting.\nMETHODS: The cross-sectional study involved an anonymous electronic questionnaire with a sample of 152 dental practitioners. The questionnaire contained 28 questions utilizing a 5-point Likert-scale to assess the perceptions of general dentists on teledentistry regarding diagnosis, accessibility, patient care, technology and finances. Chi-squared test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to analyse the results and percentages of agreement and disagreement were calculated.\nRESULTS: The participants of the questionnaire believed that teledentistry was effective for consultations and in the diagnosis of simple cases. They indicated large benefits of teledentistry in improving access, delivering post-operative care, and triaging patients, and found it particularly useful during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the participants felt that teledentistry was ineffective in diagnosing complex cases such as pathology. Concerns were also raised regarding the interventional capacity of teledentistry, the quality of the technology, data security and medicolegal issues. In general, participants preferred in-person care in comparison with teledentistry. They were neutral regarding finance.\nCONCLUSION: The study provided an insight into the perceptions of Australian dental practitioners regarding teledentistry post-COVID-19. Opinions have changed slightly, but there are large hurdles still to overcome before teledentistry is more widely accepted. Research should be continued to further improve teledentistry in the future.","PeriodicalId":155438,"journal":{"name":"ICST Transactions on Scalable Information Systems","volume":"1 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ICST Transactions on Scalable Information Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4108/eetsis.5366","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There has been an increased use of teledentistry by dental practitioners in Australia as a response to the COVID-19 pandemic. Previous studies conducted analysing the opinions of dental practitioners were performed prior to the pandemic, and therefore it is important to determine if perceptions regarding teledentistry have changed following the outbreak. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to determine the perceptions of oral healthcare professionals regarding teledentistry in a clinical setting. METHODS: The cross-sectional study involved an anonymous electronic questionnaire with a sample of 152 dental practitioners. The questionnaire contained 28 questions utilizing a 5-point Likert-scale to assess the perceptions of general dentists on teledentistry regarding diagnosis, accessibility, patient care, technology and finances. Chi-squared test and analysis of variance (ANOVA) were used to analyse the results and percentages of agreement and disagreement were calculated. RESULTS: The participants of the questionnaire believed that teledentistry was effective for consultations and in the diagnosis of simple cases. They indicated large benefits of teledentistry in improving access, delivering post-operative care, and triaging patients, and found it particularly useful during the COVID-19 pandemic. However, the participants felt that teledentistry was ineffective in diagnosing complex cases such as pathology. Concerns were also raised regarding the interventional capacity of teledentistry, the quality of the technology, data security and medicolegal issues. In general, participants preferred in-person care in comparison with teledentistry. They were neutral regarding finance. CONCLUSION: The study provided an insight into the perceptions of Australian dental practitioners regarding teledentistry post-COVID-19. Opinions have changed slightly, but there are large hurdles still to overcome before teledentistry is more widely accepted. Research should be continued to further improve teledentistry in the future.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
澳大利亚牙科医生对远程牙科治疗看法的横断面分析
简介:为应对 COVID-19 大流行,澳大利亚的牙科医生越来越多地使用远程牙科治疗。以前对牙科医生的意见进行分析的研究都是在大流行之前进行的,因此确定人们对远程牙科治疗的看法在大流行之后是否发生了变化非常重要:方法:这项横断面研究采用匿名电子问卷的形式,抽样调查了 152 名牙科医生。问卷包含 28 个问题,采用 5 点李克特量表评估普通牙医对远程医疗在诊断、可及性、患者护理、技术和财务方面的看法。结果:参与问卷调查的人认为远程医疗在咨询和诊断简单病例方面很有效。他们表示远程医疗在改善就诊、提供术后护理和分流病人方面有很大的好处,并认为远程医疗在 COVID-19 大流行期间特别有用。然而,与会者认为远程会诊在诊断病理等复杂病例方面效果不佳。与会者还对远程会诊的介入能力、技术质量、数据安全和医疗法律问题表示担忧。总体而言,与远程门诊相比,与会者更倾向于亲自就诊。结论:本研究深入探讨了澳大利亚牙科医生对第 19 次鸦片战争后远程会诊的看法。他们的观点略有改变,但要使远程口腔治疗被更广泛地接受,仍有许多障碍需要克服。今后应继续开展研究,进一步改进远程医疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Review on DDoS Attack in Controller Environment of Software Defined Network A novel color image encryption method using Fibonacci transformation and chaotic systems Eye Disease Detection Using Deep Learning Models with Transfer Learning Techniques FaceNet – A Framework for Age Variation Facial Digital Images JWTAMH: JSON Web Tokens Based Authentication Mechanism for HADOOP.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1