The Impact of Firm Technology on Carbon Disclosure: The Critical Role of Stakeholder Pressure

IF 1.5 3区 经济学 Q2 ECONOMICS Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1111/obes.12633
Morakinyo O. Adetutu, Kayode Odusanya, Eleni Stathopoulou, Thomas G. Weyman‐Jones
{"title":"The Impact of Firm Technology on Carbon Disclosure: The Critical Role of Stakeholder Pressure","authors":"Morakinyo O. Adetutu, Kayode Odusanya, Eleni Stathopoulou, Thomas G. Weyman‐Jones","doi":"10.1111/obes.12633","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The demand for transparency about the microeconomic sources of environmental pollution has surged recently, causing carbon disclosure to rise to the top of the global climate change discourse. In this study, we empirically investigate how the environmental performance of firm production technologies shapes their voluntary carbon disclosure behaviour and how key stakeholders influence the performance‐disclosure relationship. Using a panel of 1,547 firms across 24 countries covering 2006–20, we find that firms with the most efficient technologies for reducing emissions tend to disclose their carbon impact, especially when they face more stringent environmental regulations. These high‐performing firms demonstrate a tendency for non‐disclosure when faced with intense shareholder and environmental activist pushback against pollution. Our findings also highlight the existence of a profitability penalty for transparent high‐efficiency firms relative to comparable firms that adopt strategic silence.","PeriodicalId":54654,"journal":{"name":"Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12633","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The demand for transparency about the microeconomic sources of environmental pollution has surged recently, causing carbon disclosure to rise to the top of the global climate change discourse. In this study, we empirically investigate how the environmental performance of firm production technologies shapes their voluntary carbon disclosure behaviour and how key stakeholders influence the performance‐disclosure relationship. Using a panel of 1,547 firms across 24 countries covering 2006–20, we find that firms with the most efficient technologies for reducing emissions tend to disclose their carbon impact, especially when they face more stringent environmental regulations. These high‐performing firms demonstrate a tendency for non‐disclosure when faced with intense shareholder and environmental activist pushback against pollution. Our findings also highlight the existence of a profitability penalty for transparent high‐efficiency firms relative to comparable firms that adopt strategic silence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
企业技术对碳信息披露的影响:利益相关者压力的关键作用
近来,人们对环境污染的微观经济来源的透明度要求急剧上升,导致碳信息披露成为全球气候变化讨论的热点。在本研究中,我们通过实证研究探讨了企业生产技术的环境绩效如何影响其自愿碳披露行为,以及主要利益相关者如何影响绩效与披露之间的关系。通过对 2006-20 年间 24 个国家 1547 家企业的面板研究,我们发现,拥有最高效减排技术的企业倾向于披露其碳影响,尤其是在面临更严格的环境法规时。当面临股东和环保活动家对污染的强烈反对时,这些表现优异的公司则表现出不披露的倾向。我们的研究结果还强调,相对于采取战略沉默的同类公司,透明的高效率公司存在盈利惩罚。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics
Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 管理科学-统计学与概率论
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
54
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Whilst the Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics publishes papers in all areas of applied economics, emphasis is placed on the practical importance, theoretical interest and policy-relevance of their substantive results, as well as on the methodology and technical competence of the research. Contributions on the topical issues of economic policy and the testing of currently controversial economic theories are encouraged, as well as more empirical research on both developed and developing countries.
期刊最新文献
The Real Effects of Zombie Lending in Europe Factoring in the Micro: A Transaction‐Level Dynamic Factor Approach to the Decomposition of Export Volatility The Growth Effect of State Capacity Revisited Issue Information Economic Growth Analysis When Balanced Growth Paths May Be Time Varying
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1