Network structure and taxonomic composition of tritrophic communities of Fagaceae, cynipid gallwasps and parasitoids in Sichuan, China

IF 3.2 2区 农林科学 Q1 ENTOMOLOGY Insect Conservation and Diversity Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1111/icad.12768
Zhiqiang Fang, Chang‐Ti Tang, Frazer Sinclair, György L. Csóka, J. Hearn, Koorosh McCormack, G. Melika, Katarzyna M. Mikołajczak, James A. Nicholls, J. Nieves‐Aldrey, D. Notton, Sara Radosevic, R. A. Bailey, Alex Reiss, Yuanmeng M. Zhang, Ying Zhu, Shengguo Fang, K. Schönrogge, Graham N. Stone
{"title":"Network structure and taxonomic composition of tritrophic communities of Fagaceae, cynipid gallwasps and parasitoids in Sichuan, China","authors":"Zhiqiang Fang, Chang‐Ti Tang, Frazer Sinclair, György L. Csóka, J. Hearn, Koorosh McCormack, G. Melika, Katarzyna M. Mikołajczak, James A. Nicholls, J. Nieves‐Aldrey, D. Notton, Sara Radosevic, R. A. Bailey, Alex Reiss, Yuanmeng M. Zhang, Ying Zhu, Shengguo Fang, K. Schönrogge, Graham N. Stone","doi":"10.1111/icad.12768","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nA key question in insect community ecology is whether parasitoid assemblages are structured by the food plants of their herbivore hosts.\nTritrophic communities centred on oak‐feeding cynipid gallwasps are one of the best‐studied tritrophic insect communities. Previous work suggests that host plant identity is a much stronger predictor of oak–cynipid interactions than of cynipid–parasitoid interactions. However, these relationships have not been formally quantified.\nWe reason that the potential for ‘bottom‐up’ effects should increase with host plant phylogenetic diversity. We, therefore, generated quantified interaction network data for previously unstudied tritrophic cynipid communities in Sichuan, China, where, in addition to Quercus, cynipid host plants include Castanea, Castanopsis and Lithocarpus. We characterise these communities taxonomically and compare the extent to which host plant taxonomy predicts plant–herbivore and plant–parasitoid associations.\nWe sampled 42,620 cynipid galls of 176 morphotypes from 23 host plant species, yielding over 4500 specimens of 64 parasitoid morphospecies. Many parasitoids were identifiable to chalcidoid taxa present in other Holarctic oak cynipid communities, with the addition of Cynipencyrtus (Cynipencyrtidae). As elsewhere, Sichuan parasitoid assemblages were dominated by generalists.\nGallwasp–plant interaction networks were significantly more modular than parasitoid–plant association networks. Gallwasps were significantly more specialised to host plants (i.e. had higher mean d' values) than parasitoids. Parasitoid assemblages nevertheless showed significant plant‐associated beta diversity, with a dominant turnover component.\nWe summarise parallels between our study and other Fagaceae‐associated cynipid communities and discuss our findings in light of the processes thought to structure tritrophic interactions centred on endophytic insect herbivores.\n","PeriodicalId":13640,"journal":{"name":"Insect Conservation and Diversity","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Insect Conservation and Diversity","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/icad.12768","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENTOMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A key question in insect community ecology is whether parasitoid assemblages are structured by the food plants of their herbivore hosts. Tritrophic communities centred on oak‐feeding cynipid gallwasps are one of the best‐studied tritrophic insect communities. Previous work suggests that host plant identity is a much stronger predictor of oak–cynipid interactions than of cynipid–parasitoid interactions. However, these relationships have not been formally quantified. We reason that the potential for ‘bottom‐up’ effects should increase with host plant phylogenetic diversity. We, therefore, generated quantified interaction network data for previously unstudied tritrophic cynipid communities in Sichuan, China, where, in addition to Quercus, cynipid host plants include Castanea, Castanopsis and Lithocarpus. We characterise these communities taxonomically and compare the extent to which host plant taxonomy predicts plant–herbivore and plant–parasitoid associations. We sampled 42,620 cynipid galls of 176 morphotypes from 23 host plant species, yielding over 4500 specimens of 64 parasitoid morphospecies. Many parasitoids were identifiable to chalcidoid taxa present in other Holarctic oak cynipid communities, with the addition of Cynipencyrtus (Cynipencyrtidae). As elsewhere, Sichuan parasitoid assemblages were dominated by generalists. Gallwasp–plant interaction networks were significantly more modular than parasitoid–plant association networks. Gallwasps were significantly more specialised to host plants (i.e. had higher mean d' values) than parasitoids. Parasitoid assemblages nevertheless showed significant plant‐associated beta diversity, with a dominant turnover component. We summarise parallels between our study and other Fagaceae‐associated cynipid communities and discuss our findings in light of the processes thought to structure tritrophic interactions centred on endophytic insect herbivores.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国四川椑科、鞘翅目和寄生虫三营养群落的网络结构和分类组成
昆虫群落生态学中的一个关键问题是,寄生虫群落是否由其食草动物宿主的食用植物构成。以前的研究表明,寄主植物特性对栎树-鞘翅目昆虫之间相互作用的预测作用比鞘翅目昆虫-寄生虫之间相互作用的预测作用要强得多。我们的理由是,"自下而上 "效应的可能性会随着寄主植物系统发育多样性的增加而增加。因此,我们为中国四川以前未研究过的三营养鞘脂群落生成了量化的互作网络数据,除了柞树外,鞘脂寄主植物还包括蓖麻、栲和石蒜。我们从分类学角度描述了这些群落的特征,并比较了寄主植物分类学在多大程度上预测了植物-食草动物和植物-寄生虫之间的关联。许多寄生虫可与北半球其他栎类鞘翅目群落中的鞘翅目类群相鉴别,其中包括鞘翅目(Cynipencyrtus)。与其他地方一样,四川的寄生虫群落以通性寄生虫为主。瘿蚊对寄主植物的专一性(即平均 d'值更高)明显高于寄生虫。我们总结了我们的研究与其他与椑科植物相关的草履虫群落之间的相似之处,并根据以内生昆虫食草动物为中心的三营养体相互作用的结构过程讨论了我们的发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
8.60%
发文量
58
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: To publish papers of the highest scientific quality within the general area of insect (and other arthropods) conservation and diversity covering topics ranging from ecological theory to practical management. Papers are invited on the following topics: Conservation genetics; Extinction debt; Long-term conservation planning and implementation; Global implications of local or national conservation actions; Management responses of species and communities; Captive breeding programs; Comparisons of restored and natural habitats; Biogeography; Global biodiversity; Metapopulation dynamics; Climate change: impacts on distributions and range; Invasive species: impacts and control; Effects of pollution; Genetic threats to diversity by introgression; Effects of fragmentation on diversity and distribution; Impact of agricultural and forestry practices on biodiversity; Enhancing urban environments for diversity and protection; Biodiversity action plans: can we scale up from insects?; Effectiveness and choice of indicator species; Soil biodiversity and interactions with above-ground biodiversity; Ecological interactions at local levels; Ecological and evolutionary factors influencing diversity and local, regional and global scales; Sustainable livelihoods and training on the ground; Integrating science and policy.
期刊最新文献
Conservation implications of a genomic‐based taxonomy for threatened allopatric Agriades butterflies Context‐dependent effects of geographic, climate and land cover factors on hemipteran assemblages in different ecoregions of China The role of landscape factors in shaping bumble bee pathogen loads across regions of the eastern Nearctic Intraspecific trait variation of carrion beetle species and communities across elevations Complex temporal trends in biomass and abundance of Diptera communities driven by the impact of agricultural intensity
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1