On a New Taxonomy of Concepts and Conceptual Change: In Search of the Brain’s Probabilistic Language of Learning Scientific Concepts

IF 3.4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Science & Education Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1007/s11191-024-00545-9
Lin Li, George Zhou
{"title":"On a New Taxonomy of Concepts and Conceptual Change: In Search of the Brain’s Probabilistic Language of Learning Scientific Concepts","authors":"Lin Li,&nbsp;George Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s11191-024-00545-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Over four decades of conceptual change studies in education have been based on the assumption that learners come to science classrooms with functionally fixated intuitive ideas. However, it is largely ignored that such pre-instructional conceptions are probabilistic, reflecting some aspects of an idiosyncratic sampling of their experiences and intuitive decision-making. This mixed-method study foregrounds the probabilistic aspect of international students’ intuitive-to-counterintuitive conceptions when learning pendulum motion. The probability here is rooted in a moving neural time average in the mind for characterizing these students’ cognitive processes (sampling and decision-making) and learning processes (resampling and making a new decision). To sharpen the said focus, we would argue that a new taxonomy of physics concepts is needed to save the mathematical identification of the isochrony of pendulum motion. To connect the mathematical core-based taxonomy with reality, we conducted an experimental study and interviewed students to characterize these students’ reaction time and error rates in matching the period of a visually presented pendulum, which embodied its mathematical identity: <i>T</i> = 2π<span>\\(\\sqrt{l/g}\\)</span>. The reaction times and error rates data have converged on the probabilistic aspects of the students’ active learning mechanisms in their mind. The pedagogical implications of such a probabilistic cognitive mechanism have also been discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"34 4","pages":"2377 - 2407"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-024-00545-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Over four decades of conceptual change studies in education have been based on the assumption that learners come to science classrooms with functionally fixated intuitive ideas. However, it is largely ignored that such pre-instructional conceptions are probabilistic, reflecting some aspects of an idiosyncratic sampling of their experiences and intuitive decision-making. This mixed-method study foregrounds the probabilistic aspect of international students’ intuitive-to-counterintuitive conceptions when learning pendulum motion. The probability here is rooted in a moving neural time average in the mind for characterizing these students’ cognitive processes (sampling and decision-making) and learning processes (resampling and making a new decision). To sharpen the said focus, we would argue that a new taxonomy of physics concepts is needed to save the mathematical identification of the isochrony of pendulum motion. To connect the mathematical core-based taxonomy with reality, we conducted an experimental study and interviewed students to characterize these students’ reaction time and error rates in matching the period of a visually presented pendulum, which embodied its mathematical identity: T = 2π\(\sqrt{l/g}\). The reaction times and error rates data have converged on the probabilistic aspects of the students’ active learning mechanisms in their mind. The pedagogical implications of such a probabilistic cognitive mechanism have also been discussed.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
论概念和概念变化的新分类法:寻找大脑学习科学概念的概率语言
四十多年来,教育领域的概念变化研究一直基于这样的假设:学生带着功能固定的直觉观念来到科学课堂。然而,这在很大程度上被忽视了,这种教学前的概念是概率性的,反映了他们的经验和直觉决策的特殊抽样的某些方面。这种混合方法的研究突出了国际学生在学习钟摆运动时直觉到反直觉概念的概率方面。这里的概率根植于大脑中移动的神经时间平均值,用来描述这些学生的认知过程(抽样和决策)和学习过程(重新抽样和做出新的决定)。为了突出上述重点,我们认为需要一种新的物理概念分类,以节省钟摆运动等时性的数学识别。为了将基于数学核心的分类法与现实联系起来,我们进行了一项实验研究,并采访了学生,以描述这些学生在匹配视觉呈现的钟摆周期时的反应时间和错误率,这体现了钟摆的数学特性:T = 2π \(\sqrt{l/g}\)。反应时间和错误率的数据已经汇聚到学生头脑中主动学习机制的概率方面。本文还讨论了这种概率认知机制的教学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science & Education
Science & Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]
期刊最新文献
List of Reviewers—2025 Editorial Note: February 2026 Issue Information Issue Information Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1