{"title":"On a New Taxonomy of Concepts and Conceptual Change: In Search of the Brain’s Probabilistic Language of Learning Scientific Concepts","authors":"Lin Li, George Zhou","doi":"10.1007/s11191-024-00545-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Over four decades of conceptual change studies in education have been based on the assumption that learners come to science classrooms with functionally fixated intuitive ideas. However, it is largely ignored that such pre-instructional conceptions are probabilistic, reflecting some aspects of an idiosyncratic sampling of their experiences and intuitive decision-making. This mixed-method study foregrounds the probabilistic aspect of international students’ intuitive-to-counterintuitive conceptions when learning pendulum motion. The probability here is rooted in a moving neural time average in the mind for characterizing these students’ cognitive processes (sampling and decision-making) and learning processes (resampling and making a new decision). To sharpen the said focus, we would argue that a new taxonomy of physics concepts is needed to save the mathematical identification of the isochrony of pendulum motion. To connect the mathematical core-based taxonomy with reality, we conducted an experimental study and interviewed students to characterize these students’ reaction time and error rates in matching the period of a visually presented pendulum, which embodied its mathematical identity: <i>T</i> = 2π<span>\\(\\sqrt{l/g}\\)</span>. The reaction times and error rates data have converged on the probabilistic aspects of the students’ active learning mechanisms in their mind. The pedagogical implications of such a probabilistic cognitive mechanism have also been discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"34 4","pages":"2377 - 2407"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-024-00545-9","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Over four decades of conceptual change studies in education have been based on the assumption that learners come to science classrooms with functionally fixated intuitive ideas. However, it is largely ignored that such pre-instructional conceptions are probabilistic, reflecting some aspects of an idiosyncratic sampling of their experiences and intuitive decision-making. This mixed-method study foregrounds the probabilistic aspect of international students’ intuitive-to-counterintuitive conceptions when learning pendulum motion. The probability here is rooted in a moving neural time average in the mind for characterizing these students’ cognitive processes (sampling and decision-making) and learning processes (resampling and making a new decision). To sharpen the said focus, we would argue that a new taxonomy of physics concepts is needed to save the mathematical identification of the isochrony of pendulum motion. To connect the mathematical core-based taxonomy with reality, we conducted an experimental study and interviewed students to characterize these students’ reaction time and error rates in matching the period of a visually presented pendulum, which embodied its mathematical identity: T = 2π\(\sqrt{l/g}\). The reaction times and error rates data have converged on the probabilistic aspects of the students’ active learning mechanisms in their mind. The pedagogical implications of such a probabilistic cognitive mechanism have also been discussed.
期刊介绍:
Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]