Adapting Lateral Stepping Control to Walk on Winding Paths

bioRxiv Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1101/2024.07.11.603068
Anna C. Render, J. Cusumano, J. Dingwell
{"title":"Adapting Lateral Stepping Control to Walk on Winding Paths","authors":"Anna C. Render, J. Cusumano, J. Dingwell","doi":"10.1101/2024.07.11.603068","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Most often, gait biomechanics is studied during straight-ahead walking. However, real-life walking imposes many turns and/or other maneuvers people must navigate. Such maneuvers challenge people’s lateral balance and can frequently induce falls. Determining how people regulate their stepping movements to maintain balance during complex walking tasks is therefore essential. Here, 24 adults (12F/12M; Age 25.8±3.5yrs) walked on wide or narrow virtual paths that were either straight, slowly-winding, or quickly-winding. From each trial, we computed time series of step widths and lateral positions relative to the path. We applied our Goal Equivalent Manifold framework to quantify how participants adjusted their lateral stepping and step-to-step corrections of step width and lateral position as they walked on these different paths. On the narrower paths, participants walked with narrower steps and less lateral position variability. They did so by correcting step-to-step deviations in lateral position more, while correcting step-to-step deviations in step width less. On the winding paths, participants took both narrower and more variable steps. Interestingly, on slowly-winding paths, participants corrected step-to-step deviations in step width more by correcting step-to-step deviations in lateral position less: i.e., they prioritized maintaining step width over position, likely to maintain lateral balance. Conversely, on quickly-winding paths, participants strongly corrected step-to-step deviations in both step width and lateral position: i.e., they prioritized maintaining both approximately equally, consistent with trying to maximize their maneuverability. These findings have important implications for persons with gait impairments who may have elevated fall risk.","PeriodicalId":9124,"journal":{"name":"bioRxiv","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"bioRxiv","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1101/2024.07.11.603068","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Most often, gait biomechanics is studied during straight-ahead walking. However, real-life walking imposes many turns and/or other maneuvers people must navigate. Such maneuvers challenge people’s lateral balance and can frequently induce falls. Determining how people regulate their stepping movements to maintain balance during complex walking tasks is therefore essential. Here, 24 adults (12F/12M; Age 25.8±3.5yrs) walked on wide or narrow virtual paths that were either straight, slowly-winding, or quickly-winding. From each trial, we computed time series of step widths and lateral positions relative to the path. We applied our Goal Equivalent Manifold framework to quantify how participants adjusted their lateral stepping and step-to-step corrections of step width and lateral position as they walked on these different paths. On the narrower paths, participants walked with narrower steps and less lateral position variability. They did so by correcting step-to-step deviations in lateral position more, while correcting step-to-step deviations in step width less. On the winding paths, participants took both narrower and more variable steps. Interestingly, on slowly-winding paths, participants corrected step-to-step deviations in step width more by correcting step-to-step deviations in lateral position less: i.e., they prioritized maintaining step width over position, likely to maintain lateral balance. Conversely, on quickly-winding paths, participants strongly corrected step-to-step deviations in both step width and lateral position: i.e., they prioritized maintaining both approximately equally, consistent with trying to maximize their maneuverability. These findings have important implications for persons with gait impairments who may have elevated fall risk.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
调整横向步进控制,在蜿蜒小径上行走
大多数情况下,步态生物力学是在直线行走时进行研究的。然而,在现实生活中,人们在行走时必须经过许多转弯和/或其他机动动作。这些动作对人们的横向平衡能力提出了挑战,经常会导致跌倒。因此,确定人们在执行复杂的行走任务时如何调节步法动作以保持平衡至关重要。在这里,24 名成年人(12 女/12 男;年龄 25.8±3.5 岁)在宽或窄的虚拟路径上行走,这些路径或是笔直的,或是缓慢蜿蜒的,或是快速蜿蜒的。在每次试验中,我们都会计算相对于路径的步宽和横向位置的时间序列。我们运用目标等效歧体框架来量化参与者在这些不同路径上行走时如何调整横向步幅以及步幅和横向位置的步间修正。在较窄的路径上,参与者的步幅较窄,横向位置变化较小。为此,他们对步间横向位置偏差的修正幅度更大,而对步间步幅偏差的修正幅度更小。在蜿蜒曲折的道路上,参与者的步幅更窄,步幅变化也更大。有趣的是,在缓慢蜿蜒的路径上,参与者纠正步幅上的步距偏差较多,而纠正横向位置上的步距偏差较少:也就是说,他们优先考虑保持步幅而不是位置,这可能是为了保持横向平衡。相反,在快速绕行的路径上,参与者会同时纠正步幅和横向位置上的步间偏差:也就是说,他们会同等优先地保持步幅和横向位置的偏差,这与他们试图最大限度地提高机动性是一致的。这些发现对步态障碍者有重要意义,因为他们可能有更高的跌倒风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
DGTS overproduced in seed plants is excluded from plastid membranes and promotes endomembrane expansion A distant TANGO1 family member promotes vitellogenin export from the ER in C. elegans Diet-induced obesity mediated through Estrogen-Related Receptor α is independent of intestinal function The Rbfox1/LASR complex controls alternative pre-mRNA splicing by recognition of multi-part RNA regulatory modules The Once and Future Fish: 1300 years of Atlantic herring population structure and demography revealed through ancient DNA and mixed-stock analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1