Assessing Spatial Audio: A Listener-Centric Case Study on Object-Based and Ambisonic Audio Processing

IF 0.6 4区 物理与天体物理 Q4 ACOUSTICS Archives of Acoustics Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.24425/aoa.2024.148798
Paweł Małecki, Joanna Stefanska, Maja Szydłowska
{"title":"Assessing Spatial Audio: A Listener-Centric Case Study on Object-Based and Ambisonic Audio Processing","authors":"Paweł Małecki, Joanna Stefanska, Maja Szydłowska","doi":"10.24425/aoa.2024.148798","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The research explores the production and critical evaluation of two distinct mixes of “Dancing Ends”, a musical composition by Łukasz Pieprzyk. These mixes were engineered using two cutting-edge spatial sound technologies: Dolby Atmos and Ambisonics. The recording process incorporated overdub and multitrack recording techniques. Once created, the mixes were evaluated using a method of direct rating, based on an average rank system from 1 to 5, adhering strictly to the (ITU-R, 2015) BS.1116-3 and (ITU-R, 2019) BS.1284-2 standards. Evaluation criteria included factors such as mix selectivity, depth, width, and height of the sound stage, sound envelopment, tonal brightness, and quality of source localization. Additionally, some criteria were specifically tailored to evaluate characteristics unique to the composition. The evaluations were performed on three different listening systems and environments: surround systems of 5.1 and 7.1.4, and binaural listening. Although Ambisonics’ mix received higher ratings in several categories, Dolby Atmos’ mix was preferred across all listening environments. The results underscore the potential benefits of employing spatial sound technologies in music production and evaluation, offering insight into the capabilities of Dolby Atmos and Ambisonics.","PeriodicalId":8149,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Acoustics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Acoustics","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/aoa.2024.148798","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ACOUSTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The research explores the production and critical evaluation of two distinct mixes of “Dancing Ends”, a musical composition by Łukasz Pieprzyk. These mixes were engineered using two cutting-edge spatial sound technologies: Dolby Atmos and Ambisonics. The recording process incorporated overdub and multitrack recording techniques. Once created, the mixes were evaluated using a method of direct rating, based on an average rank system from 1 to 5, adhering strictly to the (ITU-R, 2015) BS.1116-3 and (ITU-R, 2019) BS.1284-2 standards. Evaluation criteria included factors such as mix selectivity, depth, width, and height of the sound stage, sound envelopment, tonal brightness, and quality of source localization. Additionally, some criteria were specifically tailored to evaluate characteristics unique to the composition. The evaluations were performed on three different listening systems and environments: surround systems of 5.1 and 7.1.4, and binaural listening. Although Ambisonics’ mix received higher ratings in several categories, Dolby Atmos’ mix was preferred across all listening environments. The results underscore the potential benefits of employing spatial sound technologies in music production and evaluation, offering insight into the capabilities of Dolby Atmos and Ambisonics.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估空间音频:以听众为中心的基于对象和 Ambisonic 音频处理案例研究
这项研究探讨了 Łukasz Pieprzyk 创作的音乐作品 "Dancing Ends "的两种不同混音的制作和批判性评价。这些混音使用了两种最先进的空间声音技术:Dolby Atmos 和 Ambisonics。录制过程采用了叠音和多轨录音技术。混音制作完成后,严格按照(ITU-R,2015 年)BS.1116-3 和(ITU-R,2019 年)BS.1284-2 标准,根据 1 至 5 的平均等级系统,采用直接评分法对混音进行评估。评估标准包括混音选择性、声场深度、宽度和高度、声音包络、音调亮度和音源定位质量等因素。此外,有些标准是专门为评估作品的独特性而制定的。评估在三种不同的聆听系统和环境下进行:5.1 和 7.1.4 环绕声系统以及双耳聆听。尽管 Ambisonics 的混音在多个类别中获得了更高的评分,但杜比全景声的混音在所有聆听环境中都更受欢迎。这些结果凸显了在音乐制作和评估中采用空间声音技术的潜在好处,并让人们深入了解了杜比全景声和 Ambisonics 的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Acoustics
Archives of Acoustics 物理-声学
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Archives of Acoustics, the peer-reviewed quarterly journal publishes original research papers from all areas of acoustics like: acoustical measurements and instrumentation, acoustics of musics, acousto-optics, architectural, building and environmental acoustics, bioacoustics, electroacoustics, linear and nonlinear acoustics, noise and vibration, physical and chemical effects of sound, physiological acoustics, psychoacoustics, quantum acoustics, speech processing and communication systems, speech production and perception, transducers, ultrasonics, underwater acoustics.
期刊最新文献
Assessing Spatial Audio: A Listener-Centric Case Study on Object-Based and Ambisonic Audio Processing Influence of Ultrasonic Cavitation on Botryococcus Braunii Growth Modelling the Acoustic Properties of Baffles Made of Porous and Fibrous Materials Study on the Impact of Drainage Noise in Residential Bathrooms Based on Finite Element Simulation An Algorithm for Ultrasonic Identification of Ceramic Materials and Virtual Prototype Realization
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1