Efficacy and safety of variceal embolization for primary prophylaxis in cirrhosis patients with challenges in standard treatments: preliminary results

Jun Tie, Xulong Yuan, Ying Zhu, Kai Li, Xiaoyuan Gou, N. Han, Jing Niu, Jiao Xu, Wenlan Wang, Yongquan Shi
{"title":"Efficacy and safety of variceal embolization for primary prophylaxis in cirrhosis patients with challenges in standard treatments: preliminary results","authors":"Jun Tie, Xulong Yuan, Ying Zhu, Kai Li, Xiaoyuan Gou, N. Han, Jing Niu, Jiao Xu, Wenlan Wang, Yongquan Shi","doi":"10.3389/fmed.2024.1401900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Nonselective beta blockers (NSBBs) or endoscopic therapies are currently recommended by guidelines for preventing the first variceal bleed in patients with high-risk varices. However, there is a lack of detailed treatment strategies for patients who are intolerant to both NSBBs and endoscopic approaches. Our study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of variceal embolization as a primary prophylaxis method in cirrhosis patients who are not suitable candidates for NSBBs or endoscopic treatments.The study included 43 cirrhotic patients with high-risk varices who were candidates for primary prophylaxis against variceal bleeding. These patients underwent variceal embolization at the Xijing Hospital between January 2020 and June 2022. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of bleeding from varices, and the secondary endpoints were the recurrence of varices and the emergence of complications.The procedure of variceal embolization had a success rate of 93.0% (40 out of 43 patients). Over a 2-year follow-up period, the rate of variceal bleeding was 11.6% (5 out of 43 patients), the recurrence rate of varices was 14.0% (6 out of 43 patients), and the rate of severe complications was limited to 2.3% (1 out of 43 patients).Variceal embolization is a viable primary prophylactic intervention for cirrhotic patients who are at risk of variceal bleeding when standard treatments, such as NSBBs or endoscopic therapies, are difficult to perform.","PeriodicalId":502302,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Medicine","volume":"42 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1401900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nonselective beta blockers (NSBBs) or endoscopic therapies are currently recommended by guidelines for preventing the first variceal bleed in patients with high-risk varices. However, there is a lack of detailed treatment strategies for patients who are intolerant to both NSBBs and endoscopic approaches. Our study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of variceal embolization as a primary prophylaxis method in cirrhosis patients who are not suitable candidates for NSBBs or endoscopic treatments.The study included 43 cirrhotic patients with high-risk varices who were candidates for primary prophylaxis against variceal bleeding. These patients underwent variceal embolization at the Xijing Hospital between January 2020 and June 2022. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of bleeding from varices, and the secondary endpoints were the recurrence of varices and the emergence of complications.The procedure of variceal embolization had a success rate of 93.0% (40 out of 43 patients). Over a 2-year follow-up period, the rate of variceal bleeding was 11.6% (5 out of 43 patients), the recurrence rate of varices was 14.0% (6 out of 43 patients), and the rate of severe complications was limited to 2.3% (1 out of 43 patients).Variceal embolization is a viable primary prophylactic intervention for cirrhotic patients who are at risk of variceal bleeding when standard treatments, such as NSBBs or endoscopic therapies, are difficult to perform.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肝硬化患者静脉曲张栓塞术用于一级预防的有效性和安全性:初步研究结果
目前,指南推荐使用非选择性β受体阻滞剂(NSBBs)或内镜疗法来预防高危静脉曲张患者的首次静脉曲张出血。然而,对于不能耐受非选择性β受体阻滞剂和内镜疗法的患者,目前还缺乏详细的治疗策略。我们的研究旨在评估静脉曲张栓塞术作为肝硬化患者一级预防方法的有效性和安全性,因为肝硬化患者不适合使用NSBBs或内窥镜治疗。这些患者于2020年1月至2022年6月期间在西京医院接受了静脉曲张栓塞治疗。静脉曲张栓塞术的成功率为93.0%(43名患者中有40名)。在为期两年的随访期间,静脉曲张出血率为11.6%(43名患者中有5名),静脉曲张复发率为14.0%(43名患者中有6名),严重并发症发生率仅为2.3%(43名患者中有1名)。对于有静脉曲张出血风险的肝硬化患者来说,当NSBB或内窥镜疗法等标准疗法难以实施时,静脉曲张栓塞术是一种可行的主要预防性干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Mycobacterium marinum hand infection: a case report and literature review Strengthening surgical healthcare research capacity in sub-Saharan Africa: impact of a research training programme in Nigeria Association between serum vitamin D and the risk of diabetic kidney disease in patients with type 2 diabetes Maternal puerperal infection caused by Parabacteroides goldsteinii: a case report Xanthogranulomatous pyelonephritis in a patient with polycystic kidney disease without underlying risk factors: a case report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1