Nascent policy subsystems in polycentric governance networks: The case of sea‐level rise governance in the San Francisco Bay Area

IF 4.1 2区 管理学 Q1 POLITICAL SCIENCE Policy Studies Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1111/psj.12549
Tara Pozzi, Elise Zufall, Kyra Gmoser‐Daskalakis, F. Vantaggiato
{"title":"Nascent policy subsystems in polycentric governance networks: The case of sea‐level rise governance in the San Francisco Bay Area","authors":"Tara Pozzi, Elise Zufall, Kyra Gmoser‐Daskalakis, F. Vantaggiato","doi":"10.1111/psj.12549","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A policy subsystem is a system of relations between actors within the context of a specific, territorially bounded policy issue. Mature policy subsystems feature well‐established, easily distinguishable, confrontational coalitions. Recent literature has explored the behavior of nascent subsystems, which emerge in response to novel policy challenges and feature developing, rather than fully fledged, coalitions. However, as yet, we lack an empirical approach to identify and analyze the structural characteristics of nascent subsystems and assess their implications for theoretical and subsystem development. How do we recognize a nascent policy subsystem when we see one? What are the drivers of its nascent coalitional structure? We answer these questions using social network analysis in the empirical case of the governance network of adaptation to sea‐level rise in the San Francisco Bay Area, using original data collected in 2018. We find that the network portrays a nascent subsystem developing out of pre‐existing coalitions focused on two facets of environmental advocacy: environmental protection and environmental justice. We conclude with recommendations for future research on policy subsystem development.","PeriodicalId":48154,"journal":{"name":"Policy Studies Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Policy Studies Journal","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/psj.12549","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A policy subsystem is a system of relations between actors within the context of a specific, territorially bounded policy issue. Mature policy subsystems feature well‐established, easily distinguishable, confrontational coalitions. Recent literature has explored the behavior of nascent subsystems, which emerge in response to novel policy challenges and feature developing, rather than fully fledged, coalitions. However, as yet, we lack an empirical approach to identify and analyze the structural characteristics of nascent subsystems and assess their implications for theoretical and subsystem development. How do we recognize a nascent policy subsystem when we see one? What are the drivers of its nascent coalitional structure? We answer these questions using social network analysis in the empirical case of the governance network of adaptation to sea‐level rise in the San Francisco Bay Area, using original data collected in 2018. We find that the network portrays a nascent subsystem developing out of pre‐existing coalitions focused on two facets of environmental advocacy: environmental protection and environmental justice. We conclude with recommendations for future research on policy subsystem development.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多中心治理网络中的新生政策子系统:旧金山湾区海平面上升治理案例
政策子系统是指在特定的、有地域限制的政策问题背景下,参与者之间的关系系统。成熟的政策子系统的特点是建立了完善的、易于区分的对抗性联盟。最近有文献探讨了新生子系统的行为,这些子系统是为应对新的政策挑战而出现的,其特点是联盟正在发展中,而不是完全成熟。然而,我们还缺乏一种实证方法来识别和分析新生子系统的结构特征,并评估其对理论和子系统发展的影响。我们如何识别新生政策子系统?新生联盟结构的驱动因素是什么?我们利用 2018 年收集的原始数据,通过对旧金山湾区适应海平面上升治理网络的实证案例进行社会网络分析,回答了这些问题。我们发现,该网络描绘了一个新生的子系统,它是由先前存在的联盟发展而来的,重点关注环境倡导的两个方面:环境保护和环境正义。最后,我们对政策子系统发展的未来研究提出了建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
31
期刊介绍: As the principal outlet for the Public Policy Section of the American Political Science Association and for the Policy Studies Organization (PSO), the Policy Studies Journal (PSJ) is the premier channel for the publication of public policy research. PSJ is best characterized as an outlet for theoretically and empirically grounded research on policy process and policy analysis. More specifically, we aim to publish articles that advance public policy theory, explicitly articulate its methods of data collection and analysis, and provide clear descriptions of how their work advances the literature.
期刊最新文献
Analyzing antimicrobial resistance as a series of collective action problems Learning by proxy: How burdensome policies shape policy implementors' views of government Partisan collaboration in policy adoption: An experimental study with local government officials Advocacy groups, policy subsidies, and policy change: The case of teacher evaluations Nascent policy subsystems in polycentric governance networks: The case of sea‐level rise governance in the San Francisco Bay Area
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1