Exploring Nature of Science Understanding, Science Self-efficacy and Their Relationships Among Secondary School Pre-service Science Teachers in Ethiopia

IF 3.4 1区 教育学 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Science & Education Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1007/s11191-024-00543-x
Gidele Gito Gizaw, Solomon Sorsa Sota, Samuel Assefa Zinabu, Deribe Workineh Adamu
{"title":"Exploring Nature of Science Understanding, Science Self-efficacy and Their Relationships Among Secondary School Pre-service Science Teachers in Ethiopia","authors":"Gidele Gito Gizaw,&nbsp;Solomon Sorsa Sota,&nbsp;Samuel Assefa Zinabu,&nbsp;Deribe Workineh Adamu","doi":"10.1007/s11191-024-00543-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Nature of science (NOS) conception and science self-efficacy (SSE) are among the components of scientific literacy and the professional competency of science teachers. In this study, pre-service science teachers (PSSTs) (<i>n</i> = 145) NOS conception, SSE, and the relationships among these constructs were explored. Moreover, the existence of differences in the construct in gender, scientific disciplines, and year levels was investigated. We used the instruments Students Understanding of Science and Scientific Inquiry Scale (SUSSI) for NOS conception and the SSE scale for SSE data collection, and mean comparisons and Spearman correlation for the analysis. PSST’s overall NOS conception and SSE were found to be less informed and moderate, respectively. Specifically, they have an uninformed conception of the NOS theme’s distinction between law and theory, and scientific methodology. PSST’s NOS conception was not significantly influenced by differences in year level, gender, or science disciplines, but SSE was significantly influenced by year levels. Overall NOS conception and SSE did not show a statistically significant correlation. However, SSE was found to be positively correlated with scientific theory tentativeness and negatively correlated with distinction between scientific laws and theories themes of NOS. These findings indicate that the development of NOS conception and SSE among PSST needs attention from science curriculum developers and science teacher educators. Furthermore, it showed the necessity for consideration of independent development strategies for NOS conceptions and SSE.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":771,"journal":{"name":"Science & Education","volume":"34 5","pages":"2991 - 3014"},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Science & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11191-024-00543-x","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Nature of science (NOS) conception and science self-efficacy (SSE) are among the components of scientific literacy and the professional competency of science teachers. In this study, pre-service science teachers (PSSTs) (n = 145) NOS conception, SSE, and the relationships among these constructs were explored. Moreover, the existence of differences in the construct in gender, scientific disciplines, and year levels was investigated. We used the instruments Students Understanding of Science and Scientific Inquiry Scale (SUSSI) for NOS conception and the SSE scale for SSE data collection, and mean comparisons and Spearman correlation for the analysis. PSST’s overall NOS conception and SSE were found to be less informed and moderate, respectively. Specifically, they have an uninformed conception of the NOS theme’s distinction between law and theory, and scientific methodology. PSST’s NOS conception was not significantly influenced by differences in year level, gender, or science disciplines, but SSE was significantly influenced by year levels. Overall NOS conception and SSE did not show a statistically significant correlation. However, SSE was found to be positively correlated with scientific theory tentativeness and negatively correlated with distinction between scientific laws and theories themes of NOS. These findings indicate that the development of NOS conception and SSE among PSST needs attention from science curriculum developers and science teacher educators. Furthermore, it showed the necessity for consideration of independent development strategies for NOS conceptions and SSE.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
探索埃塞俄比亚中学职前科学教师的科学理解、科学自我效能感的性质及其关系
科学本质(NOS)概念和科学自我效能感(SSE)是科学素养和科学教师专业能力的组成部分。本研究对145名职前科学教师(psst)的NOS概念、SSE及其构念之间的关系进行了探讨。此外,还调查了性别、学科和年级水平上的差异。我们使用学生科学理解和科学探究量表(SUSSI)来测量NOS概念,使用SSE量表来收集SSE数据,并进行均值比较和Spearman相关分析。PSST的总体NOS概念和SSE分别被发现信息较少和中等。具体来说,他们对NOS主题的法与理论的区别以及科学的方法论缺乏了解。PSST的NOS概念不受年级、性别和学科差异的显著影响,而SSE受年级差异的显著影响。总体NOS概念与SSE无统计学显著相关。研究结果表明,科学理论的尝试性与科学规律与科学理论主题的区分呈显著正相关,与科学理论的尝试性呈显著负相关。这些结果表明,科学课程开发人员和科学教师教育工作者需要关注科学理论概念和科学理论主题的发展。此外,本文还提出了自主发展战略与自主发展战略的必要性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Science & Education
Science & Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
14.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Science Education publishes original articles on the latest issues and trends occurring internationally in science curriculum, instruction, learning, policy and preparation of science teachers with the aim to advance our knowledge of science education theory and practice. In addition to original articles, the journal features the following special sections: -Learning : consisting of theoretical and empirical research studies on learning of science. We invite manuscripts that investigate learning and its change and growth from various lenses, including psychological, social, cognitive, sociohistorical, and affective. Studies examining the relationship of learning to teaching, the science knowledge and practices, the learners themselves, and the contexts (social, political, physical, ideological, institutional, epistemological, and cultural) are similarly welcome. -Issues and Trends : consisting primarily of analytical, interpretive, or persuasive essays on current educational, social, or philosophical issues and trends relevant to the teaching of science. This special section particularly seeks to promote informed dialogues about current issues in science education, and carefully reasoned papers representing disparate viewpoints are welcomed. Manuscripts submitted for this section may be in the form of a position paper, a polemical piece, or a creative commentary. -Science Learning in Everyday Life : consisting of analytical, interpretative, or philosophical papers regarding learning science outside of the formal classroom. Papers should investigate experiences in settings such as community, home, the Internet, after school settings, museums, and other opportunities that develop science interest, knowledge or practices across the life span. Attention to issues and factors relating to equity in science learning are especially encouraged.. -Science Teacher Education [...]
期刊最新文献
List of Reviewers—2025 Editorial Note: February 2026 Issue Information Issue Information Issue Information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1