TEP or TAPP: who, when, and how?

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.3389/fsurg.2024.1352196
A. Iossa, Giovanni Traumueller Tamagnini, Francesco De Angelis, Alessandra Micalizzi, Giulio Lelli, Giuseppe Cavallaro
{"title":"TEP or TAPP: who, when, and how?","authors":"A. Iossa, Giovanni Traumueller Tamagnini, Francesco De Angelis, Alessandra Micalizzi, Giulio Lelli, Giuseppe Cavallaro","doi":"10.3389/fsurg.2024.1352196","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Groin hernia repair is the most common procedure performed by general surgeons. The open mesh technique generally represents the main technique for an inguinal repair, but a different approach is often required. Laparoscopy was found to be the answer to minimizing the impact of the preperitoneal open techniques described by Nyhus and Stoppa. The introduction of the totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) in the early 1990s started a new chapter in groin hernia surgery. The minimally invasive techniques vs. open mesh, and then one against the other, soon became a hot topic among abdominal wall surgeons. With time, the number of procedures and indications increased and are still increasing. This review aims to provide an overview of the two main laparoscopic techniques for groin hernia repair, answering the following questions: Who should perform them? What is the learning curve required to minimize complications and optimize operative time? When is a minimally invasive approach indicated, and which one (both in elective and in emergency setting)? How are they performed? The standard techniques have been described in detail, and personal observations from an abdominal wall surgery referral center were added. The main reviews from the early 2000s up to date, which compared the techniques, were analyzed, and the results reported, confirming the comparable safety and efficacy of both these techniques.","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":"12 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fsurg.2024.1352196","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Groin hernia repair is the most common procedure performed by general surgeons. The open mesh technique generally represents the main technique for an inguinal repair, but a different approach is often required. Laparoscopy was found to be the answer to minimizing the impact of the preperitoneal open techniques described by Nyhus and Stoppa. The introduction of the totally extraperitoneal hernia repair (TEP) and transabdominal preperitoneal repair (TAPP) in the early 1990s started a new chapter in groin hernia surgery. The minimally invasive techniques vs. open mesh, and then one against the other, soon became a hot topic among abdominal wall surgeons. With time, the number of procedures and indications increased and are still increasing. This review aims to provide an overview of the two main laparoscopic techniques for groin hernia repair, answering the following questions: Who should perform them? What is the learning curve required to minimize complications and optimize operative time? When is a minimally invasive approach indicated, and which one (both in elective and in emergency setting)? How are they performed? The standard techniques have been described in detail, and personal observations from an abdominal wall surgery referral center were added. The main reviews from the early 2000s up to date, which compared the techniques, were analyzed, and the results reported, confirming the comparable safety and efficacy of both these techniques.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
TEP 或 TAPP:谁、何时、如何?
腹股沟疝修补术是普外科最常见的手术。开放式网片技术通常是腹股沟疝修补术的主要技术,但通常需要采用不同的方法。Nyhus 和 Stoppa 所描述的腹膜前开放技术可将腹腔镜手术的影响降至最低。20 世纪 90 年代初,腹膜外疝修补术(TEP)和经腹膜前疝修补术(TAPP)的问世为腹股沟疝手术揭开了新的篇章。微创技术与开放式网片的对比,以及两者之间的对比很快成为腹壁外科医生的热门话题。随着时间的推移,手术的数量和适应症不断增加,目前仍在不断增加。本综述旨在概述腹股沟疝修补术的两种主要腹腔镜技术,回答以下问题:由谁来实施?最大限度减少并发症和优化手术时间所需的学习曲线是什么?什么情况下适合采用微创方法,以及哪种方法(包括择期手术和急诊手术)?如何进行微创手术?对标准技术进行了详细描述,并加入了来自腹壁外科转诊中心的个人观察。分析了从 2000 年代初至今对这两种技术进行比较的主要综述,并报告了结果,证实这两种技术的安全性和有效性相当。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
Tetrapyrrole Complexes with Unusual Geometries: a Main Group Element Perspective Bioinspired Nanofluidic Temperate Synthesis Diiron(I) Bis(cyclopentadienyl) Complexes with Bridging Iminium Ligands: From Foundational Organometallic Chemistry to Unique Reactivity and Biological Potential. Catalysis over Isolated and Nested Lewis Acid Centers and Noble Metal Centers Anchored by Nested Lewis Acid Centers in Zeolites Structure and Dynamics of Membrane Proteins in Native Cellular Membranes Revealed by In Situ Solid-State NMR.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1