Análise do perfil de devoluções de quimioterapias endovenosas em um hospital filantrópico de Salvador-BA

Mariana Saraiva dos Santos, Luana Santana Bacelar, Soane Da Silva Félix, Patrícia Lima de Araújo, Regina Maria da Hora dos Santos Azevedo, M. T. Bendicho, R. Xavier
{"title":"Análise do perfil de devoluções de quimioterapias endovenosas em um hospital filantrópico de Salvador-BA","authors":"Mariana Saraiva dos Santos, Luana Santana Bacelar, Soane Da Silva Félix, Patrícia Lima de Araújo, Regina Maria da Hora dos Santos Azevedo, M. T. Bendicho, R. Xavier","doi":"10.22239/2317-269x.02054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: The increase in the costs of cancer treatments is configured as a relevant problem for health services linked to the constant incorporation of new drugs for cancer treatment. This growth in expenses reflects the challenge of managing resources to meet the needs of the oncologic area. It is necessary to optimize resources in view of the growing demand and associated costs. In the scenario where patients receive personalized treatments, changes in therapy are possible, causing some returns of antineoplastic drugsand increasing costs in health services. Objective: To analyze the profile of returns of chemotherapy drugs handled by the Pharmacy sector and the relationship with costs in a philanthropic hospital in Salvador. Method: This was a cross-sectional, retrospective, and analytical study conducted between August 2019 and August 2020. Data were collected through forms obtained after the return of chemotherapy. Information such as the drug name, dose, reuse status, and reason for return were evaluated. Data were tabulated using SPSS software. Results: 171 chemotherapy bags were returned involving 19 active ingredients. The clinical factor accounted for 59.1% of the returns. Cisplatin accounted for 14.6% of the returns. Carboplatin was the most discarded drug, representing 16.9% of the lost bags, whereas Cisplatin had the highest rate of reuse. In pharmacoeconomics, the returns represented the value of R$ 13,887.87. The hospital lost R$ 7,475.61 with the discarded products but saved R$ 6,412.21 through reuse. Conclusions: Oncology needs to be linked to pharmacoeconomics and to minimize discards, strategies should be adopted.","PeriodicalId":515818,"journal":{"name":"Vigilância Sanitária em Debate","volume":"28 14","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vigilância Sanitária em Debate","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22239/2317-269x.02054","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The increase in the costs of cancer treatments is configured as a relevant problem for health services linked to the constant incorporation of new drugs for cancer treatment. This growth in expenses reflects the challenge of managing resources to meet the needs of the oncologic area. It is necessary to optimize resources in view of the growing demand and associated costs. In the scenario where patients receive personalized treatments, changes in therapy are possible, causing some returns of antineoplastic drugsand increasing costs in health services. Objective: To analyze the profile of returns of chemotherapy drugs handled by the Pharmacy sector and the relationship with costs in a philanthropic hospital in Salvador. Method: This was a cross-sectional, retrospective, and analytical study conducted between August 2019 and August 2020. Data were collected through forms obtained after the return of chemotherapy. Information such as the drug name, dose, reuse status, and reason for return were evaluated. Data were tabulated using SPSS software. Results: 171 chemotherapy bags were returned involving 19 active ingredients. The clinical factor accounted for 59.1% of the returns. Cisplatin accounted for 14.6% of the returns. Carboplatin was the most discarded drug, representing 16.9% of the lost bags, whereas Cisplatin had the highest rate of reuse. In pharmacoeconomics, the returns represented the value of R$ 13,887.87. The hospital lost R$ 7,475.61 with the discarded products but saved R$ 6,412.21 through reuse. Conclusions: Oncology needs to be linked to pharmacoeconomics and to minimize discards, strategies should be adopted.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
萨尔瓦多一家慈善医院静脉化疗回访情况分析(阿拉伯联合酋长国
导言:随着治疗癌症的新药物不断问世,癌症治疗费用的增长已被视为医疗服务的一个相关问题。费用的增长反映了管理资源以满足肿瘤领域需求的挑战。考虑到不断增长的需求和相关费用,有必要优化资源。在患者接受个性化治疗的情况下,治疗方法有可能发生变化,从而导致抗肿瘤药物的部分回流和医疗服务成本的增加。目的分析萨尔瓦多一家慈善医院药房部门处理的化疗药物退货情况及其与成本之间的关系。方法:这是一项横断面回顾性研究:这是一项横断面、回顾性和分析性研究,于 2019 年 8 月至 2020 年 8 月间进行。数据通过化疗结束后获得的表格收集。对药物名称、剂量、重复使用情况和退药原因等信息进行了评估。数据使用 SPSS 软件制表。结果共退回 171 袋化疗药物,涉及 19 种有效成分。临床因素占退货的 59.1%。顺铂占退货的 14.6%。卡铂是被丢弃最多的药物,占丢失药袋的 16.9%,而顺铂的重复利用率最高。从药物经济学角度看,退回的药物价值为 13,887.87 雷亚尔。医院因废弃产品损失了 7,475.61 雷亚尔,但通过重复使用节省了 6,412.21 雷亚尔。结论肿瘤学需要与药物经济学挂钩,并应采取相应策略,尽量减少废弃物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Lesão pulmonar induzida pelo uso excessivo de cigarros eletrônicos: toxicantes envolvidos e mecanismos fisiopatológicos Avaliação da qualidade das farmácias comunitárias: uma revisão de escopo Perfil das prescrições de fitoterápicos anabolizantes comercializados por uma farmácia magistral no Rio de Janeiro Produção artesanal de alimentos lácteos em Goiás: análise de normativas e cenário do Selo Arte Análise do perfil de devoluções de quimioterapias endovenosas em um hospital filantrópico de Salvador-BA
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1