Metabolomics and network pharmacology exploration of the effects of bile acids on carotid atherosclerosis and potential underlying mechanisms

Xing Cheng, Ruijing Zhang, Xiaotong Qi, Heng Wang, Tingting Gao, Lin Zheng, Maolin Qiao, Yaling Li, Siqi Gao, Jinshan Chen, Runze Chang, Guoping Zheng, Honglin Dong
{"title":"Metabolomics and network pharmacology exploration of the effects of bile acids on carotid atherosclerosis and potential underlying mechanisms","authors":"Xing Cheng, Ruijing Zhang, Xiaotong Qi, Heng Wang, Tingting Gao, Lin Zheng, Maolin Qiao, Yaling Li, Siqi Gao, Jinshan Chen, Runze Chang, Guoping Zheng, Honglin Dong","doi":"10.3389/fendo.2024.1430720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Bile acids (BAs), products of gut microbiota metabolism, have long been implicated in atherosclerotic disease pathogenesis. Characterizing the serum bile acid profile and exploring its potential role in carotid atherosclerosis (CAS) development are crucial tasks.In this study, we recruited 73 patients with CAS as the disease group and 77 healthy individuals as the control group. We systematically measured the serum concentrations of 15 bile acids using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Multivariate logistic regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were applied to analyze the impact of bile acids on the disease and select the key BAs. The possible molecular mechanism was elucidated by network pharmacology.(1) The BA profile of patients with CAS significantly differed. (2) Multifactorial logistic regression analysis identified elevated levels of GCDCA (OR: 1.01, P < 0.001), DCA (OR: 1.01, P = 0.005), and TDCA (OR: 1.05, P = 0.002) as independent risk factors for CAS development. Conversely, GCA (OR: 0.99, P = 0.020), LCA (OR: 0.83, P = 0.002), and GUDCA (OR: 0.99, P = 0.003) were associated with protective effects against the disease. GCA, DCA, LCA, and TDCA were identified as the four key BAs. (3) TNF, FXR, GPBAR1, ESR1 and ACE were predicted to be targets of BAs against AS. These four BAs potentially impact AS progression by triggering signaling pathways, including cAMP, PPAR, and PI3K-AKT pathways, via their targets.This study offers valuable insights into potential therapeutic strategies for atherosclerosis that target bile acids.","PeriodicalId":505784,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Endocrinology","volume":"16 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/fendo.2024.1430720","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Bile acids (BAs), products of gut microbiota metabolism, have long been implicated in atherosclerotic disease pathogenesis. Characterizing the serum bile acid profile and exploring its potential role in carotid atherosclerosis (CAS) development are crucial tasks.In this study, we recruited 73 patients with CAS as the disease group and 77 healthy individuals as the control group. We systematically measured the serum concentrations of 15 bile acids using ultrahigh-performance liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS). Multivariate logistic regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression were applied to analyze the impact of bile acids on the disease and select the key BAs. The possible molecular mechanism was elucidated by network pharmacology.(1) The BA profile of patients with CAS significantly differed. (2) Multifactorial logistic regression analysis identified elevated levels of GCDCA (OR: 1.01, P < 0.001), DCA (OR: 1.01, P = 0.005), and TDCA (OR: 1.05, P = 0.002) as independent risk factors for CAS development. Conversely, GCA (OR: 0.99, P = 0.020), LCA (OR: 0.83, P = 0.002), and GUDCA (OR: 0.99, P = 0.003) were associated with protective effects against the disease. GCA, DCA, LCA, and TDCA were identified as the four key BAs. (3) TNF, FXR, GPBAR1, ESR1 and ACE were predicted to be targets of BAs against AS. These four BAs potentially impact AS progression by triggering signaling pathways, including cAMP, PPAR, and PI3K-AKT pathways, via their targets.This study offers valuable insights into potential therapeutic strategies for atherosclerosis that target bile acids.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
胆汁酸对颈动脉粥样硬化的影响及潜在内在机制的代谢组学和网络药理学探索
胆汁酸(BA)是肠道微生物群代谢的产物,长期以来一直被认为与动脉粥样硬化疾病的发病机制有关。在这项研究中,我们招募了 73 名 CAS 患者作为疾病组,77 名健康人作为对照组。我们采用超高效液相色谱-质谱法(UPLC-MS/MS)系统地测定了血清中 15 种胆汁酸的浓度。应用多元逻辑回归和最小绝对收缩与选择算子(LASSO)回归分析胆汁酸对疾病的影响,并筛选出关键的胆汁酸。网络药理学阐明了可能的分子机制。(2)多因素逻辑回归分析发现,GCDCA(OR:1.01,P < 0.001)、DCA(OR:1.01,P = 0.005)和TDCA(OR:1.05,P = 0.002)水平升高是CAS发病的独立危险因素。相反,GCA(OR:0.99,P = 0.020)、LCA(OR:0.83,P = 0.002)和 GUDCA(OR:0.99,P = 0.003)则具有保护作用。GCA、DCA、LCA 和 TDCA 被确定为四个关键 BA。(3) TNF、FXR、GPBAR1、ESR1 和 ACE 被认为是抗 AS 的 BAs 靶点。这四种胆汁酸通过其靶点触发信号通路,包括 cAMP、PPAR 和 PI3K-AKT 通路,从而对 AS 的进展产生潜在影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
T1 mapping combined with arterial spin labeling MRI to identify renal injury in patients with liver cirrhosis Adjunctive benefits of low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation for obesity frequent chronic conditions: a systematic review Cadmium activation of wild-type and constitutively active estrogen receptor alpha Editorial: Preventing cardiovascular complications of type 2 diabetes The causal relationship between antihypertensive drugs and depression: a Mendelian randomization study of drug targets
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1