Conceptualising a model for provider-employer collaborations in quantity surveying degree apprenticeship programmes

L. Obi
{"title":"Conceptualising a model for provider-employer collaborations in quantity surveying degree apprenticeship programmes","authors":"L. Obi","doi":"10.1108/heswbl-11-2023-0324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeWith increasing demand to enhance collaborative practices in Degree Apprenticeship (DA) programmes like Quantity Surveying Degree Apprenticeships (QSDA), there is a notable lack of models supporting employer engagement, particularly in curriculum design and delivery. This study aims to fill this gap.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative research approach was employed, utilising semi-structured interviews, focus groups and questionnaires to gather stakeholder perspectives involved in QSDA programmes in England. This process aimed to identify key practice areas, collaboration process and enablers needed to conceptualise a collaborative model for employer engagement in QSDA curriculum design and delivery.FindingsThe model highlights four collaborative stages, four practice areas, fourteen focus actions, and twelve enablers essential for provider-employer collaborations in QSDA curriculum design and delivery.Originality/valueThis study introduces a novel curriculum design model emphasising the collaboration process and enablers for provider-employer engagement. It offers new insights for QSDA programme curriculum development and is the first to address this area, contributing to the literature on Degree Apprenticeships in built environment education.","PeriodicalId":502760,"journal":{"name":"Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning","volume":"38 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/heswbl-11-2023-0324","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeWith increasing demand to enhance collaborative practices in Degree Apprenticeship (DA) programmes like Quantity Surveying Degree Apprenticeships (QSDA), there is a notable lack of models supporting employer engagement, particularly in curriculum design and delivery. This study aims to fill this gap.Design/methodology/approachA qualitative research approach was employed, utilising semi-structured interviews, focus groups and questionnaires to gather stakeholder perspectives involved in QSDA programmes in England. This process aimed to identify key practice areas, collaboration process and enablers needed to conceptualise a collaborative model for employer engagement in QSDA curriculum design and delivery.FindingsThe model highlights four collaborative stages, four practice areas, fourteen focus actions, and twelve enablers essential for provider-employer collaborations in QSDA curriculum design and delivery.Originality/valueThis study introduces a novel curriculum design model emphasising the collaboration process and enablers for provider-employer engagement. It offers new insights for QSDA programme curriculum development and is the first to address this area, contributing to the literature on Degree Apprenticeships in built environment education.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
构思工料测量学位学徒课程中提供方与雇主合作的模式
目的随着工料测量学位学徒制(QSDA)等学位学徒制(DA)项目对加强合作实践的需求日益增长,支持雇主参与的模式明显缺乏,尤其是在课程设计和实施方面。本研究旨在填补这一空白。本研究采用了定性研究方法,利用半结构化访谈、焦点小组和问卷调查来收集英格兰参与 QSDA 项目的利益相关者的观点。研究结果该模型强调了四个合作阶段、四个实践领域、十四个重点行动和十二个促进因素,这些对于提供方和雇主在 QSDA 课程设计和实施中的合作至关重要。它为 QSDA 课程开发提供了新的见解,也是首次涉及这一领域的研究,为有关建筑环境教育学位学徒制的文献做出了贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Employability and long-term work life outcomes from studying at a Swedish university college: problematizing the notion of mismatch Investigating the mediating role of self-efficacy between digital leadership capability, intercultural competence, and employability among working undergraduates The use of problem-solving methodology to develop institutional and curricular change: work-integrated learning as a strategy of differentiation Students' reflections of quality (RoQ) in work-integrated learning (WIL): a systematic review and framework Employability and motivation: which motivational theories are most appropriate?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1