Empirical relationships between Arias Intensity and peak ground acceleration for western China

Jia Mei Liu, Bin Zhang, Xuan Zhao
{"title":"Empirical relationships between Arias Intensity and peak ground acceleration for western China","authors":"Jia Mei Liu, Bin Zhang, Xuan Zhao","doi":"10.3389/feart.2024.1434194","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is little available attenuation relationship for Arias Intensity (AI) in China. Empirical relationships between AI and peak ground acceleration (PGA) provide another option for predicting AI. We establish empirical relationships for AI and PGA for western China, utilizing 3,169 horizontal and 979 vertical strong motion records with PGA ≥0.01 g from 274 earthquakes (MS 4.0–8.0), originating in eight provinces in southwest (Yunnan, Sichuan) and northwest China (Gansu, Shaanxi, Ningxia, Qinghai, Inner Mongolia, and Xinjiang). The influences of MS epicenter distance, and site conditions indicators VS30, generic site classes (i.e., rock and soil) are explored. The results show that the logarithm of AI increases linearly with the increase of the logarithm of PGA and MS, and decreases with the logarithm of VS30. However, the influence of site conditions on AI-PAG relationships can't be recognized by the simple generic rock and soil site classes. The epicenter distance has little effect on the AI-PAG relationships. Empirical relationships are developed to estimate horizontal or vertical AI as a function of PGA (basic model), PGA and MS (model 2) for southwest, northwest, and western China, using all the records. Empirical relationships for AI as a function of PGA, MS, and VS30 (model 1) are established using the 2,248 horizontal (70.9% of the total) and 670 vertical (68.4% of the total) records with VS30 between 148 and 841m/s. The notable disparity between model 1 of the southwest and northwest regions is chiefly attributed to local site conditions, indicating that the AI-PGA correlation is region-dependent. These findings enable one way of estimating AI for western China and will contribute to a better understanding of AI attenuation.","PeriodicalId":505744,"journal":{"name":"Frontiers in Earth Science","volume":"24 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Frontiers in Earth Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2024.1434194","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

There is little available attenuation relationship for Arias Intensity (AI) in China. Empirical relationships between AI and peak ground acceleration (PGA) provide another option for predicting AI. We establish empirical relationships for AI and PGA for western China, utilizing 3,169 horizontal and 979 vertical strong motion records with PGA ≥0.01 g from 274 earthquakes (MS 4.0–8.0), originating in eight provinces in southwest (Yunnan, Sichuan) and northwest China (Gansu, Shaanxi, Ningxia, Qinghai, Inner Mongolia, and Xinjiang). The influences of MS epicenter distance, and site conditions indicators VS30, generic site classes (i.e., rock and soil) are explored. The results show that the logarithm of AI increases linearly with the increase of the logarithm of PGA and MS, and decreases with the logarithm of VS30. However, the influence of site conditions on AI-PAG relationships can't be recognized by the simple generic rock and soil site classes. The epicenter distance has little effect on the AI-PAG relationships. Empirical relationships are developed to estimate horizontal or vertical AI as a function of PGA (basic model), PGA and MS (model 2) for southwest, northwest, and western China, using all the records. Empirical relationships for AI as a function of PGA, MS, and VS30 (model 1) are established using the 2,248 horizontal (70.9% of the total) and 670 vertical (68.4% of the total) records with VS30 between 148 and 841m/s. The notable disparity between model 1 of the southwest and northwest regions is chiefly attributed to local site conditions, indicating that the AI-PGA correlation is region-dependent. These findings enable one way of estimating AI for western China and will contribute to a better understanding of AI attenuation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国西部阿里亚斯强度与峰值地面加速度之间的经验关系
在中国,几乎没有可用的阿里亚斯强度(AI)衰减关系。阿里亚斯强度与峰值地面加速度(PGA)之间的经验关系为预测阿里亚斯强度提供了另一种选择。我们利用中国西南(云南、四川)和西北(甘肃、陕西、宁夏、青海、内蒙古和新疆)八省区 274 次地震(MS 4.0-8.0)中 PGA ≥0.01 g 的 3,169 条水平强震记录和 979 条垂直强震记录,建立了中国西部地区阿里亚斯强度与 PGA 的经验关系。探讨了 MS 震中距、场地条件指标 VS30、场地类别(即岩石和土壤)的影响。结果表明,AI 的对数随 PGA 和 MS 对数的增加而线性增加,随 VS30 对数的增加而减小。然而,场地条件对 AI-PAG 关系的影响并不能通过简单的通用岩土场地等级来识别。震中距对 AI-PAG 关系的影响很小。利用所有记录,建立了经验关系来估算中国西南、西北和西部的水平或垂直 AI 与 PGA(基本模型)、PGA 和 MS(模型 2)的函数关系。利用 VS30 在 148 至 841m/s 之间的 2,248 条水平记录(占总数的 70.9%)和 670 条垂直记录(占总数的 68.4%),建立了 AI 与 PGA、MS 和 VS30 的函数关系(模式 1)。西南地区和西北地区模型 1 之间的显著差异主要归因于当地的场地条件,表明 AI-PGA 相关性取决于地区。这些发现为估算中国西部的人工影响提供了一种方法,有助于更好地理解人工影响衰减。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Slope reliability assessment using an innovative critical failure path approach Editorial: Women in science: geohazards and georisks 2022 Editorial: Citizen science and climate services in cities: current state, new approaches and future avenues for enhancing urban climate resilience Construction and preliminary analysis of landslide database triggered by heavy storm in the parallel range-valley area of western Chongqing, China, on 8 June 2017 Monitoring the Hunga Volcano (Kingdom of Tonga) starting from the unrests of 2014/2015 to the 2021/2022 explosion with the Sentinel 1-2 and Landsat 8-9 satellites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1