Is it necessary to stop glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists prior to endoscopic procedure? A retrospective study

IF 4.3 3区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY World Journal of Gastroenterology Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.3748/wjg.v30.i26.3221
Haider Ghazanfar, N. Javed, Abeer Qasim, Franklin Sosa, Faryal Altaf, Shazia Khan, Jaydeep Mahasamudram, Abhilasha Jyala, Sameer Kandhi, Dongmin Shin, Nikhitha Mantri, Haozhe Sun, S. Hanumanthu, H. Patel, Jasbir Makker, Bhavna Balar, Anil Dev, S. Chilimuri
{"title":"Is it necessary to stop glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists prior to endoscopic procedure? A retrospective study","authors":"Haider Ghazanfar, N. Javed, Abeer Qasim, Franklin Sosa, Faryal Altaf, Shazia Khan, Jaydeep Mahasamudram, Abhilasha Jyala, Sameer Kandhi, Dongmin Shin, Nikhitha Mantri, Haozhe Sun, S. Hanumanthu, H. Patel, Jasbir Makker, Bhavna Balar, Anil Dev, S. Chilimuri","doi":"10.3748/wjg.v30.i26.3221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) are effective in diabetes and obesity, reducing hyperglycemia by increasing insulin release and delaying gastric emptying. However, they can cause gastroparesis, raising concerns about aspiration during procedures. Recent guidelines advise discontinuing GLP-1 RA before surgery to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration.\n AIM\n To evaluate the effect of GLP-1 RAs on gastric residual contents during endoscopic procedures.\n METHODS\n A retrospective chart review at BronxCare Health System, New York, from January 2019 to October 2023, assessed gastric residue and aspiration in GLP-1 RA patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. Two groups were compared based on dietary status before the procedure. Data included demographics, symptoms of gastroparesis, opiate use, hemoglobin A1c, GLP-1 agonist indication, endoscopic details, and aspiration occurrence. IBM SPSS was used for analysis, calculating means, standard deviations, and applying Pearson’s chi-square and t-tests for associations, with P < 0.05 as being significant.\n RESULTS\n During the study, 306 patients were included, with 41.2% on a clear liquid/low residue diet and 58.8% on a regular diet before endoscopy. Most patients (63.1%) were male, with a mean age of 60 ± 12 years. The majority (85.6%) were on GLP-1 RAs for diabetes, and 10.1% reported digestive symptoms before endoscopy. Among those on a clear liquid diet, 1.5% had residual food at endoscopy compared to 10% on a regular diet, which was statistically significant (P = 0.03). Out of 31 patients with digestive symptoms, 13% had residual food, all from the regular diet group (P = 0.130). No complications were reported during or after the procedures.\n CONCLUSION\n The study reflects a significant rise in GLP-1 RA use for diabetes and obesity. A 24-hour liquid diet seems safe for endoscopic procedures without aspiration. Patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms might have a higher residual food risk, though not statistically significant. Further research is needed to assess risks based on diabetes duration, gastroparesis, and GLP-1 RA dosing, aiming to minimize interruptions in therapy during procedures.","PeriodicalId":23778,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Gastroenterology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v30.i26.3221","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

BACKGROUND Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) are effective in diabetes and obesity, reducing hyperglycemia by increasing insulin release and delaying gastric emptying. However, they can cause gastroparesis, raising concerns about aspiration during procedures. Recent guidelines advise discontinuing GLP-1 RA before surgery to reduce the risk of pulmonary aspiration. AIM To evaluate the effect of GLP-1 RAs on gastric residual contents during endoscopic procedures. METHODS A retrospective chart review at BronxCare Health System, New York, from January 2019 to October 2023, assessed gastric residue and aspiration in GLP-1 RA patients undergoing endoscopic procedures. Two groups were compared based on dietary status before the procedure. Data included demographics, symptoms of gastroparesis, opiate use, hemoglobin A1c, GLP-1 agonist indication, endoscopic details, and aspiration occurrence. IBM SPSS was used for analysis, calculating means, standard deviations, and applying Pearson’s chi-square and t-tests for associations, with P < 0.05 as being significant. RESULTS During the study, 306 patients were included, with 41.2% on a clear liquid/low residue diet and 58.8% on a regular diet before endoscopy. Most patients (63.1%) were male, with a mean age of 60 ± 12 years. The majority (85.6%) were on GLP-1 RAs for diabetes, and 10.1% reported digestive symptoms before endoscopy. Among those on a clear liquid diet, 1.5% had residual food at endoscopy compared to 10% on a regular diet, which was statistically significant (P = 0.03). Out of 31 patients with digestive symptoms, 13% had residual food, all from the regular diet group (P = 0.130). No complications were reported during or after the procedures. CONCLUSION The study reflects a significant rise in GLP-1 RA use for diabetes and obesity. A 24-hour liquid diet seems safe for endoscopic procedures without aspiration. Patients with upper gastrointestinal symptoms might have a higher residual food risk, though not statistically significant. Further research is needed to assess risks based on diabetes duration, gastroparesis, and GLP-1 RA dosing, aiming to minimize interruptions in therapy during procedures.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
内镜手术前是否需要停用胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂?回顾性研究
背景胰高血糖素样肽-1 受体激动剂(GLP-1 RA)对糖尿病和肥胖症有效,可通过增加胰岛素释放和延迟胃排空来降低高血糖。但是,它们可能会引起胃痉挛,从而引发手术过程中的吸入问题。最近的指南建议在手术前停用 GLP-1 RA,以降低肺吸入的风险。目的 评估 GLP-1 RA 对内镜手术期间胃残留物的影响。方法 2019 年 1 月至 2023 年 10 月在纽约布朗克斯医疗保健系统(BronxCare Health System)进行回顾性病历审查,评估接受内窥镜手术的 GLP-1 RA 患者的胃残留物和吸入情况。根据手术前的饮食状况对两组患者进行了比较。数据包括人口统计学、胃痉挛症状、阿片类药物使用情况、血红蛋白 A1c、GLP-1 受体激动剂适应症、内镜细节和吸入发生情况。使用 IBM SPSS 进行分析,计算平均值、标准差,并应用皮尔逊卡方检验和 t 检验进行关联检验,以 P < 0.05 为显著。结果 研究期间共纳入 306 名患者,其中 41.2% 的患者在内镜检查前食用清流食/低渣饮食,58.8% 的患者在内镜检查前食用常规饮食。大多数患者(63.1%)为男性,平均年龄(60 ± 12)岁。大多数患者(85.6%)服用GLP-1 RAs治疗糖尿病,10.1%的患者在内镜检查前报告有消化道症状。在服用清流食的患者中,1.5%的患者在内镜检查时有残留食物,而服用普通饮食的患者为10%,差异有统计学意义(P = 0.03)。在31名有消化道症状的患者中,13%有残留食物,全部来自普通饮食组(P = 0.130)。手术过程中和手术后均未见并发症。结论 该研究表明,GLP-1 RA 在糖尿病和肥胖症中的使用显著增加。24 小时流质饮食在内窥镜手术中似乎是安全的,不会发生吸入。有上消化道症状的患者可能会有较高的残留食物风险,但没有统计学意义。需要进一步开展研究,根据糖尿病病程、胃痉挛和 GLP-1 RA 剂量评估风险,以尽量减少手术期间的治疗中断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
World Journal of Gastroenterology
World Journal of Gastroenterology 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
7.80
自引率
4.70%
发文量
464
审稿时长
2.4 months
期刊介绍: The primary aims of the WJG are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in gastroenterology and hepatology.
期刊最新文献
Autophagy and its role in gastrointestinal diseases. Beyond bacteria: Role of non-bacterial gut microbiota species in inflammatory bowel disease and colorectal cancer progression. Computed tomography-based multi-organ radiomics nomogram model for predicting the risk of esophagogastric variceal bleeding in cirrhosis. Construction and validation of a pancreatic cancer prognostic model based on genes related to the hypoxic tumor microenvironment. Dual-targeted treatment for inflammatory bowel disease: Whether fecal microbiota transplantation can be an important part of it.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1