{"title":"Sharing is caring: Designing incentive rebate strategies for information‐sharing alliances","authors":"Yueran Zhuo, Senay Solak, Yi Zou, Bingyan Hu","doi":"10.1111/deci.12640","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Information security plays a crucial role in organizational governance and management, and information‐sharing alliances (ISAs) have emerged as effective platforms for the secure and controlled sharing of information security knowledge. Despite their potential, many ISAs face financial and operational challenges, including inadequate pricing policies and insufficient incentives for information sharing. This study addresses these challenges by proposing a modeling framework for the fee rebate strategies that ISAs can deploy to motivate effective information sharing. Taking into account the economic implications of both information sharing and information security technology investment, we propose two ISA‐based pricing rebate strategies for information sharing: the split‐return rebate strategy and the swap‐return rebate strategy. Analytical and numerical analyses are conducted to demonstrate the dynamics in different ISA settings under these pricing rebate strategies. The results suggest that in addition to firm size, the price for participating in sharing should be adjusted based on each participating firm's technology investment level, its information‐sharing level, and the marginal cost of information sharing. Also, by focusing on various information‐sharing environments, the study identifies specific conditions under which unfair sharing practices are likely to occur.","PeriodicalId":48256,"journal":{"name":"DECISION SCIENCES","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"DECISION SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/deci.12640","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Information security plays a crucial role in organizational governance and management, and information‐sharing alliances (ISAs) have emerged as effective platforms for the secure and controlled sharing of information security knowledge. Despite their potential, many ISAs face financial and operational challenges, including inadequate pricing policies and insufficient incentives for information sharing. This study addresses these challenges by proposing a modeling framework for the fee rebate strategies that ISAs can deploy to motivate effective information sharing. Taking into account the economic implications of both information sharing and information security technology investment, we propose two ISA‐based pricing rebate strategies for information sharing: the split‐return rebate strategy and the swap‐return rebate strategy. Analytical and numerical analyses are conducted to demonstrate the dynamics in different ISA settings under these pricing rebate strategies. The results suggest that in addition to firm size, the price for participating in sharing should be adjusted based on each participating firm's technology investment level, its information‐sharing level, and the marginal cost of information sharing. Also, by focusing on various information‐sharing environments, the study identifies specific conditions under which unfair sharing practices are likely to occur.
信息安全在组织治理和管理中发挥着至关重要的作用,信息共享联盟(ISA)已成为安全、可控地共享信息安全知识的有效平台。尽管具有潜力,但许多 ISA 面临着财务和运营方面的挑战,包括定价政策不当和信息共享激励不足。为应对这些挑战,本研究提出了一个收费回扣策略的建模框架,ISA 可利用该框架激励有效的信息共享。考虑到信息共享和信息安全技术投资的经济影响,我们提出了两种基于互联网服务提供商的信息共享定价回扣策略:分割回扣策略和交换回扣策略。我们进行了分析和数值分析,以展示在这些定价回扣策略下不同 ISA 环境下的动态变化。结果表明,除企业规模外,参与共享的价格还应根据各参与企业的技术投资水平、信息共享水平和信息共享的边际成本进行调整。此外,通过关注各种信息共享环境,本研究还确定了可能出现不公平共享行为的具体条件。
期刊介绍:
Decision Sciences, a premier journal of the Decision Sciences Institute, publishes scholarly research about decision making within the boundaries of an organization, as well as decisions involving inter-firm coordination. The journal promotes research advancing decision making at the interfaces of business functions and organizational boundaries. The journal also seeks articles extending established lines of work assuming the results of the research have the potential to substantially impact either decision making theory or industry practice. Ground-breaking research articles that enhance managerial understanding of decision making processes and stimulate further research in multi-disciplinary domains are particularly encouraged.