Conor Shaw, Flávia de Andrade Pereira, Karim Farghaly, Cathal Hoare, Timo Hartmann, James O'Donnell
{"title":"Life cycle cost analysis at scale: a reference architecture-based approach","authors":"Conor Shaw, Flávia de Andrade Pereira, Karim Farghaly, Cathal Hoare, Timo Hartmann, James O'Donnell","doi":"10.1108/bepam-07-2023-0132","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis research demonstrates the theoretical merit of a reference architecture-based approach to life cycle cost (LCC) analysis system provision in the built environment. LCC insight is considered fundamental to sustainable decision making by asset managers; however, the current capabilities in practice do not align with the political ambition and the scale of competencies required to realise sectoral emissions–reduction targets.Design/methodology/approachIn pursuing practical outcomes, the study employs a custom design science research-inspired methodology. Domain requirements are gathered via literature research as an initial top-down software reference architecture which is refined, bottom-up, through testing and implementation in a representative case study. A prototype IT system and reference architecture artefact are developed and used to evaluate the concept qualitatively through broad practitioner focus groups.FindingsSentiment analysis of the expert opinions is broadly positive and helps to substantiate the proposal’s theoretical suitability in addressing the scalability challenge. Additionally, constructive feedback provides guidance towards this trajectory, highlighting the importance of aligning with existing communities and standards, broadening future research scope to consider further scenarios and prioritisation of efforts to build trust around contracts and data quality.Originality/valueThe novelty of the work is the provision of the reusable LCC reference architecture development methodology.Practical implicationsThe concept has the potential to provide LCC capabilities to industry at scale while the artefacts developed herein can be appended to existing LCC standards as implementation guidance to support IT system developers. Furthermore, the developed methodology can be employed in harmonisation efforts between policy and practice.","PeriodicalId":505703,"journal":{"name":"Built Environment Project and Asset Management","volume":"74 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Built Environment Project and Asset Management","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/bepam-07-2023-0132","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
PurposeThis research demonstrates the theoretical merit of a reference architecture-based approach to life cycle cost (LCC) analysis system provision in the built environment. LCC insight is considered fundamental to sustainable decision making by asset managers; however, the current capabilities in practice do not align with the political ambition and the scale of competencies required to realise sectoral emissions–reduction targets.Design/methodology/approachIn pursuing practical outcomes, the study employs a custom design science research-inspired methodology. Domain requirements are gathered via literature research as an initial top-down software reference architecture which is refined, bottom-up, through testing and implementation in a representative case study. A prototype IT system and reference architecture artefact are developed and used to evaluate the concept qualitatively through broad practitioner focus groups.FindingsSentiment analysis of the expert opinions is broadly positive and helps to substantiate the proposal’s theoretical suitability in addressing the scalability challenge. Additionally, constructive feedback provides guidance towards this trajectory, highlighting the importance of aligning with existing communities and standards, broadening future research scope to consider further scenarios and prioritisation of efforts to build trust around contracts and data quality.Originality/valueThe novelty of the work is the provision of the reusable LCC reference architecture development methodology.Practical implicationsThe concept has the potential to provide LCC capabilities to industry at scale while the artefacts developed herein can be appended to existing LCC standards as implementation guidance to support IT system developers. Furthermore, the developed methodology can be employed in harmonisation efforts between policy and practice.
目的 本研究展示了基于参考架构的方法在建筑环境中提供生命周期成本(LCC)分析系统的理论价值。生命周期成本洞察力被认为是资产管理者进行可持续决策的基础;然而,当前的实际能力与实现部门减排目标所需的政治抱负和能力规模并不相符。通过文献研究收集领域需求,作为最初的自上而下的软件参考架构,并通过在代表性案例研究中的测试和实施进行自下而上的完善。开发了一个原型 IT 系统和参考架构工件,并通过广泛的从业人员焦点小组对该概念进行定性评估。研究结果对专家意见的情感分析具有广泛的积极意义,有助于证实该提案在应对可扩展性挑战方面的理论适用性。此外,建设性的反馈意见为实现这一目标提供了指导,强调了与现有社区和标准保持一致的重要性,拓宽了未来的研究范围,以考虑更多的方案,并优先考虑围绕合同和数据质量建立信任的工作。此外,所开发的方法可用于政策与实践之间的协调工作。